Q&A: Must a Shipper Provide a Copy of the Special Permit to the Carrier When Applicable?
A question received through my website (Contact me) on March 16, 2016:
In addition to the DOT-SP number being listed on the hazmat shipping paper, are you also required to send a copy of the DOT-SP with the hazmat shipment? We are primarily shipping 2.2 compressed gas with the DOT-SP stamped on the bottle. Thanks
My reply that same day:
The requirement to provide a copy of the special permit with the shipment will be indicated on the special permit.
In its general conditions the special permit will also require that everyone who must comply with its conditions must have a copy available. Therefore, if the conditions of the special permit require any awareness of them by the carrier or the receiving facility, then you must provide a copy of it for them. However, there are many special conditions that can function without the participation of the carrier or the receiving facility – and sometimes – the shipper.
That being said, it doesn’t hurt to provide a copy of the special permit with the shipping papers and instruct persons who may come in contact with it of their use.
I hope this helps. Please don’t hesitate to contact me with any other questions.
Q&A: Hazardous Waste (Aerosol Cans) in an Office Environment
First contact March 15, 2016:
Daniel,
Do empty aerosol cans that are generated in an office environment have to be treated the same as if they were generated in a manufacturing environment? We generate empty aerosol cans in our manufacturing plant and treat them as hazardous waste. We accumulate them in a metal 55 gallon drum and when filled we pay someone to generate a manifest and pick them up for disposal. How are empty aerosol cans disposed of in an office building? Can they just be tossed in the trash?
I would appreciate any input on this that you can provide. We are located in St. Louis, MO.
My snap reply that same day:
Management of waste aerosol cans, and indeed all waste, is subject to the same federal and state regulations if it comes from a business.
And, a more thorough answer also on March 15th:
The question of whether or not aerosol cans are a hazardous waste is tricky. Please note below:
If they meet the definition of RCRA Empty they may be disposed of in the trash. Be careful with this since some landfills and state agencies don’t like to see unpunctured aerosol cans in the trash.
If destined for recycling as scrap metal they don’t have to be RCRA Empty. Be careful with this since some recyclers don’t like to see unpunctured aerosol cans in their scrap.
If destined for recycling you may puncture the cans in a device designed for that purpose (follow all worker safety regulations). This is not considered to be treatment of a hazardous waste if the punctured cans are to be recycled.
Many aerosol cans are a D001 Ignitable or D002 Corrosive hazardous waste due to their contents. I believe that an aerosol can retaining any pressure will be a D003 Reactive hazardous waste no matter its contents. Not everyone agrees with that.
I hope this helps. Please don’t hesitate to contact me with any other questions.
Below are some articles I’ve written in the past that will assist in understanding the conclusions of this Q&A:
12 Ways for Hazardous Waste Generators to Avoid Compliance Problems and Minimize Liability
OK, full disclosure: The following list borrows heavily from The Hazardous Waste Generator’s Handbook created by the Kansas Department of Health and Environment (KDHE). I highly recommend it to any Kansas business that requires an introduction to the state regulations for generators of hazardous waste, universal waste, and used oil. What I have appropriated for my own use below are some very good guiding principals that can be used by any business anywhere to ensure compliance with the Federal and state – whatever state you’re in – regulations and to minimize the liability associated with generating a waste.
Minimize the amount of hazardous waste generated. This can be done in several ways including a formal Waste Management System or a simple review of what is used at the facility and a look at alternatives to see if less toxic substitutes can be found. Another waste minimization method is to change to different processes that utilize less product and/or produce less waste. Most waste minimization projects pay for themselves within a couple of years through reduced product purchases and reduced waste disposal costs.
Determine what is the primary environmental regulatory enforcement agency in your state. The USEPA allows all states, territories, and tribes to operate their own hazardous waste program within their jurisdiction if the program meets USEPA requirements and is thereby “authorized”. Does your state/territory/tribe have its own authorized hazardous waste program? Or is it subject to Federal regulations? Read this article to find out: State Authorization Under RCRA.
Good housekeeping, by removing old, unused products, empty containers, old parts, etc. to create space and reduce potential regulatory issues and complaints. Proceed carefully through any clean-up of old or unused product. The act of “cleaning-up” could be interpreted as disposal which results in the generation of a waste. It is quite possible that one result of your clean-up may be the generation of enough hazardous waste to change your hazardous waste generator status.
Locate and deal with reputable transportation, treatment, and disposal firms. If a price quote is substantially less than the competition, there is probably a reason why. It is also a good idea to conduct audits of your hazardous waste disposal sites and the transporters who deliver it.
Have backup transporters and disposal sites selected in case your primary providers have problems.
Recognize when you lack the expertise to handle a particular problem and seek help from a person with experience in hazardous waste management. I’ll answer all of your questions for free!
Contact me with any questions you may have about the generation, identification, management, and disposal of hazardous waste
Follow up on all hazardous waste shipments to ensure they reach their intended destination and are treated or disposed. Remember: depending on your hazardous waste generator status (see the survey above) you may be required to submit an Exception Report to your state or the USEPA if you do not receive a signed copy of the Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest within a specified time-frame.
Do not mix hazardous wastes with nonhazardous wastes unless you are familiar with all regulations that may apply. The resultant mixture may be a hazardous waste and may be more difficult or costly to dispose than the original waste.
Maintain all records regarding the hazardous waste program (test results, contingency plan, manifests, exception reports, annual reports, training documents) in one location.
Designate at least one employee with an appropriate background to be responsible for hazardous waste management. Give that employee the authority and resources to do the job, and then hold him or her accountable.
Training for Hazardous Waste Personnel can increase knowledge of the regulations
Provide high-quality training for any employee whose job responsibilities require knowledge of hazardous waste regulations. Depending on your hazardous waste generator status (see the survey above) you may be required to provide applicable employees with specific training at a regular frequency. In many cases the training must be documented and records kept to demonstrate compliance. Read more about USEPA training for Hazardous Waste Personnel. Even if training isn’t required – as is the case for a Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator of hazardous waste – it’s always a good idea to increase the awareness of the regulations at your facility.
Conduct inspections of your facility and its operations. Do so with an open mind and no preconceived notions of the way things ought to be. Depending on your hazardous waste generator status and the requirements of your state, weekly inspections may be required of all areas where hazardous waste accumulates.
Use these guidelines to stay in compliance with both Federal and State regulations and to minimize – and perhaps eliminate – the cradle-to-grave responsibility your company has for the waste it generates. And don’t hesitate to contact me if you have any questions about the generation or management of waste.
The Specification Packaging Marking Requirements of 49 CFR 178.3
Most packagings intended for the transportation in commerce of a hazardous material must be designed, manufactured, and tested to meet either a DOT specification or a UN standard, which is then known as a specification packaging (Don’t confuse “specification packaging” with “DOT specification”, not all “specification packaging” is a “DOT specification” packaging, some may meet a UN standard). A specification packaging must display a specification marking that meets the requirements of both of the following found in Title 49 of the Code of Federal Regulations:
The applicable regulations for the type of packaging; e.g. cylinders, portable tanks, non-bulk, intermediate bulk containers (IBCs), large packagings, and more throughout part 178.
The general specification marking requirements for all packagings found at §178.3
In this article I will identify and describe the requirements of 49 CFR 178.3 – specifically, those of §178.3(a) – for the display of the specification marking – either a DOT specification or a UN standard – on a specification packaging.
What’s Wrong with this Picture? Marking on a Hazardous Waste Container per 40 CFR 262.32(b)
It’s quite simple, really. USEPA regulations at 40 CFR 262, subpart C require the generator of a hazardous waste to prepare it for off-site transportation according to both USEPA and USDOT/PHMSA regulations.
Note: 40 CFR 262, subpart C – indeed, all of part 262 – applies to large quantity generators of hazardous waste and small quantity generators of hazardous waste. A conditionally exempt small quantity generator of hazardous waste is not subject to the part or the requirements described in this article.
To summarize the regulations briefly, USEPA – check with your state for any additional requirements – mandates the generator of a hazardous waste to select and use the packaging (called a container in USEPA regulations) and to apply HazMat labels and markings it in accordance with the Hazardous Material Regulations of USDOT/PHMSA. However, in §263.32(b) USEPA deviates from the HMR and requires the hazardous waste generator to apply the following markings – in addition to those required by USDOT/PHMSA – to a container of 119 gallons or less:
HAZARDOUS WASTE—Federal Law Prohibits Improper Disposal. If found, contact the nearest police or public safety authority or the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.
Generator’s Name and Address _____.
Generator’s EPA Identification Number_____.
Manifest Tracking Number _____.
Note: The Manifest Tracking Number can only be obtained from the Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest. It is unique to each manifest.
But wait! This article is supposed to be about something done wrong. Where’s the mistake?
Here:
The markings contained on the yellow hazardous waste label in this picture are not required on a container of this size.
So, what’s wrong with this picture?
The yellow label contains information that is not required on a packaging of this size (>119 gallons). Though, admittedly, it is not a violation for it to be present.
The Class 9 Miscellaneous HazMat label to the right should not be displayed on a packaging of this size (18 cubic meters or more) either. A packaging of this size should display placards on all four sides if placards are required, which they are not, since, Class 9 placards are not required to be displayed for transportation within the U.S.
I doubt very much – though I can’t prove it – that the packaging contains hazardous waste at all. I suspect this is a case of an overly cautious person who has only a tentative grasp of the regulations just trying to do their best.
Do you need to know more about the regulations of the USEPA for Hazardous Waste Personnel and those of the USDOT/PHMSA for HazMat Employees? If so, please contact me to schedule training (either Onsite or Webinar) or just to answer any questions you may have.
Q&A: Display of Placard on the Headache Rack of a Truck
I found your website on Google. I have a question that I couldn’t find an answer to. I know hazmat placards must be visible from all 4 directions (with a few exceptions). But my question is this…specifically…
I have a 1-ton truck with a headache rack. Can I mount the front placard on the top of the headache rack so that it is 100% visible from the front? I would have the other 3 in the normal places. I read where it has to be mounted on both sides, front, & rear. It would not be actually “mounted” on the front, but it would be clearly visible. If it is acceptable, can you please tell me where it says it so that I can keep proof in the truck? Thank you for your time.
I replied the next day (6.16.16) and didn’t pretend to understand everything she was talking about:
Thank you for your question. I will reply later today or tomorrow.
Question: What is a headache rack?
The customer helped me out:
It is a metal guard that goes across the back of the truck to protect the driver & the rear windshield from any part of the load entering the cab.
The headache rack on this truck is circled in red.
With that information, I was ready to get to work (6.17.16):
OK. I’ll work on getting you an answer.
A few days later (6.21.16):
I apologize for my delay in responding. I have an answer for you.
49 CFR 172.504(a) requires placards to be displayed on each side and each end of a transport vehicle such as your 1-ton truck. 49 CFR 172.516(a) requires a placard to be clearly visible from the direction it faces, except for the direction of another transport vehicle (i.e. a tractor trailer combination where the placard on the front of the cargo trailer or tank is blocked from view by the tractor). There is no mention in the regulations of your specific situation. However, a letter of interpretation by the USDOT (LOI 09-0055) does address your issue. it reads, “Generally, placards on the sides and ends of the cargo-carrying portion of a vehicle’s cargo body satisfy requirements for placarding the sides and ends, even if they are not located at the outer perimeter of the vehicle, as long as they are readily visible and not obscured by appurtenances in the direction they face.”
A combination of the above-cited regulations and the LOI should suffice as proof that the method of mounting the placard as you propose is compliant with USDOT regulations.
I hope this helps.
Thank you and please contact me with any other questions.
And, once again, another question answered for someone that I may never hear from again (6.21.16).
Thank you for your help.
When the Marine Pollutant Mark is not Required
The purpose of this article is not to identify and explain a marine pollutant as regulated by the Hazardous Material Regulations of the PHMSA/USDOT; you can read all about that here: What is a Marine Pollutant? But, a brief summary will help; a marine pollutant is…
Defined at 49 CFR 171.8.
Listed by name in appendix B to the Hazardous Materials Table at §172.101.
If in a mixture or solution of one or more substances is at or above the following threshold concentrations:
10% by weight for a regular marine pollutant
1% by weight for a severe marine pollutant (identified with “PP”).
And…
Not excepted from regulation as a marine pollutant at §171.4(c).
The purpose of this article is also not to identify and explain all of the situations where the marine pollutant marking is not required on a packaging containing a regulated marine pollutant. Those can be found at §172.322(d) and will have to wait to a later article.
Note: To be quite frank, I find the exceptions from the marine pollutant mark detailed at §172.322(d)(1) and (2) to be contradictory and confusing.
The purpose of this article is to identify and explain just one of the four situations – found at §172.322(d)(3) – where the marine pollutant mark is not required on a bulk packaging, freight container or transport vehicle that already bears a HazMat label or placard.
Q&A: Transporting Lead Acid Batteries for Reclamation as a Material of Trade
A former coworker contacted me with a question on January 29, 2016:
I have a quick question for you Dan. If a facility has 5 – 6 consumer (car type) lead-acid batteries that they want to take to a salvage yard for recycling, is there a DOT exemption or something that keeps them from being classified as a hazardous substance. I think they need to transport with shipping papers and be properly labeled. Let me know if you have any experience with this.
Thanks,
I had time to fire off a reply that day:
Please note below:
When discarded by recycling a liquid lead acid battery will be a hazardous waste per USEPA regulations.
Liquid lead acid batteries sent for reclamation are excluded from regulation as a hazardous waste per 40 CFR 266.80.
A liquid lead acid battery is a hazardous material per USDOT regulations.
The following is required under the Materials of Trade exception:
Secure batteries in vehicle.
Label batteries.
Likely batteries contain a Reportable Quantity (RQ) for lead, so this must be marked on the side.
Inform driver of Materials of Trade exception and some basic worker safety.
No more than 66 lbs/battery & no more than 440 lbs of HazMat in the vehicle.
FYI: Even though this situation does not require HazMat Employee training, the fact that they receive hazardous materials makes them subject to the training requirements. They may also need RCRA training.
Note from Daniels Training Services:
My reply does not take into account the exception from regulation available to shippers of batteries found at 49 CFR 173.159(e).
Questions like this come into me all the time. Sometimes they can be answered simply. Sometimes more time and research is required. Either way, I’m happy to answer any questions you may have about the transportation of hazardous materials or the generation and management of hazardous waste.
Q&A: Transporting an Infectious Substance (Division 6.2) in a Personal or Company Vehicle
I received this email January 25th from a customer who had attended one of my Training Seminars in the past:
Dan,
How have you been? You said to contact you if we have any questions. I was asked a question and I would like you to please review my answer. Can you help me out?
Question:
Can a 6.2 category B infectious substance be shipped in a personal or company vehicle?
Answer:
Yes, a company vehicle can be used to transport a 6.2 category B substance, if the following exemptions are met.
49 CFR 173.134 (b)(10) allows an exception to using a certified hazmat transporter to transport a category B substance for a patient sample (not a culture) and the private or contract carrier would have
Used hypodermic needles may be a category B, Infectious Substance
to be used exclusively to transport such materials. The vehicle couldn’t be a private vehicle but could be a company fleet vehicle. The vehicle could not be used for transporting anything else during that individual trip. The vehicle couldn’t be a general delivery vehicle making several stops. DOT training would be required and a Shipping document and DOT packaging would be needed.
49 CFR 173.6 Materials of Trade allows an exemption for small quantities of biological product, human or animal samples for research, diagnosis, disease treatment or prevention etc. The packaging would have to be securely closed and protect against damage and leaking. The driver would have to know what they are shipping and if a reportable quantity is present and the material of trade regulations. Does not require training or a shipping document.
Thanks,
My reply later that day:
Your answer may be correct. Give me a day or two to review and reply.
Contact me with any questions you may have about the transportation of hazardous materials by air, highway, vessel, or rail
Thanks for contacting me. I’ll do my best to answer your questions below.
Transportation by a private motor carrier of a Division 6.2 Category B Infectious Substance:
You are mostly correct about the exception at 49 CFR 173.134(b)(10). Please see below for a breakdown of that paragraph:
Paragraph §173.134(b) identifies sixteen (16) materials not subject to the HMR as a Division 6.2. If they are a HazMat for some other reason (e.g., a Class 3 Flammable Liquid), they are then subject to the HMR. Read my article: Exceptions to Division 6.2 Infectious Substances.
§173.134(b)(10) is an exception for samples or biological products that meet the following conditions:
It is not a Category A infectious substance. Category A infectious substance as defined at §173.134(a)(1)(i) can cause permanent disability, life-threatening, or fatal disease in an otherwise healthy person.
It is one of the following:
Contained in a patient sample and transported for research, diagnosis, investigational activities, or disease treatment or prevention.
Or…
A biological product.
Transported in a motor vehicle (by highway) used exclusively to transport such materials (patient sample or biological product).
Transported by one of following:
Private motor carrier (carrier owns material it transports).
Or…
Contract carrier (under contract for specific job).
The following are OK to transport with sample or biological product if properly packaged and secured against exposure:
Medical or clinical equipment and lab products.
If sample or biological product is regulated medical waste per §173.134(a)(5), it must be transported as such. This may require compliance with §173.134(c).
Where I believe you to be in error:
“The vehicle couldn’t be a private vehicle…” A private vehicle may be used as long as it is a private or contract carrier.
“The vehicle could not be used for transporting anything else during that individual trip.” Some other materials are allowed if packaged and secured properly.
“DOT training would be required and a Shipping document and DOT packaging would be needed.” Per §173.134(b), those materials subject to the exception are not subject to the HMR as a Division 6.2 Infectious Substance.
Thanks Dan for your response. I look forward to attending future training sessions with you.
This customer did his own research before contacting me but you don’t have to! If you have a question about the transportation of hazardous materials or the management of waste – hazardous, universal, used oil, even non-hazardous – don’t hesitate to contact me.
The exception at 49 CFR 173.134(b)(10) removes the requirement for HazMat Employee training; but you may still benefit from the training I can provide!
Conditional Exclusion at 40 CFR 261.4(a)(20) for Zinc-Bearing Hazardous Secondary Materials Used to Make Zinc Fertilizer
Though a small part of overall fertilizer production in the U.S., the reclamation of zinc from what would otherwise be discarded as a solid waste – if done correctly – can result in a substantial benefit to the environment. Below is a presentation (also on my SlideShare account) that describes the conditions of 40 CFR 261.4(a)(20).
Contact me with any questions you may have about the generation, identification, management, and disposal of hazardous waste