Closure of Hazardous Waste Accumulation Unit at Large Quantity Generator

Closure of Hazardous Waste Accumulation Unit at Large Quantity Generator

A large quantity generator of hazardous waste (LQG) is subject to the RCRA regulations of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) for the cradle-to-grave management of its waste.  If the LQG will cease the accumulation of hazardous waste at a particular accumulation unit within its facility – even temporarily – then it is necessary to comply with the closure regulations of 40 CFR 262.17(a)(8).  The purpose of this article is to explain the regulatory responsibility of a large quantity generator of hazardous waste for the closure of a hazardous waste accumulation unit (specifically, a central accumulation area for containers of hazardous waste) under new regulations codified by the Generator Improvements Rule.

Before we begin…

Regulations already in affect prior to May 30, 2017 required an LQG to take specific actions when closing certain hazardous waste accumulation units (tanks, drip pads, and containment buildings but not hazardous waste in containers) at its facility.  Those regulations – originally found at §262.34(a)(1)(iv)(B) and now at §262.17(a)(8) – were clarified and strengthened as part of the Generator Improvements Rule.  The most significant change was the addition of hazardous waste containers in a central accumulation area (CAA) to the existing closure requirements for tanks, drip pads, and containment buildings.

The Generator Improvements Rule has not – as of this writing – been adopted in all states.  This particular requirement of the rule must eventually be adopted by all states since it is more strict than existing regulations.  However, states have until July 1 of 2019 to adopt these more strict regulations.  Read: What is the status of the Generator Improvements Rule in my state?

Scope:

The requirements of §262.17(a)(8) are applicable to…

  • A LQG.  Neither a small quantity generator (SQG) nor very small quantity generator (VSQG) of hazardous waste are subject to these regulations. The minimal closure regulations applicable to a SQG that accumulates hazardous waste in a tank are found at §262.16(b)(3)(vi).  There are no closure requirements for a VSQG.  A treatment, storage, and disposal facility (TSDF) has its own closure regulations found in parts 264/265 of Title 40.

Not sure of your hazardous waste generator status?

Take this short survey

  • The accumulation of hazardous waste.  Wastes that are non-hazardous, hazardous but excluded or exempt by regulation, managed by the generator under an option other than hazardous waste (e.g. universal waste, used oil), or those regulated as a hazardous waste by state regulations but not Federal are not subject to these USEPA closure regulations
  • The accumulation of hazardous waste in a central accumulation area (CAA), not a satellite accumulation area (SAA). §262.17(a)(8)(v) states this clearly.
  • The closure of an accumulation unit at a facility and/or the closure of the facility.  Note: this article will address solely the requirements for closure of an accumulation unit.  If interested in the requirements for closure of a facility, read:  Large Quantity Generator of Hazardous Waste Facility Closure.  The closure of an accumulation unit means hazardous waste accumulation will cease – even temporarily – at that precise location though it may continue
  • elsewhere within the facility.  To further clarify: moving a 55-gallon hazardous waste drum from one area of the facility to another is considered to be closure of an accumulation unit.
  • The accumulation of hazardous waste in any of the four (4) hazardous waste accumulation units: containers, tanks, containment buildings, and drip pads.  Read more about the four hazardous waste accumulation units.  Note: this article will focus solely on the closure requirement for hazardous waste accumulated in containers.

Contact me with any questions you may have about the generation, identification, management, and disposal of hazardous waste

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

The Purpose:

USEPA’s purpose with these new regulations (part of the Generator Improvements Rule) is to ensure LQGs accumulating hazardous waste in containers meet the same closure requirements as LQGs accumulating hazardous waste in tanks, drip pads, and containment buildings.  USEPA has determined that a significant number of site clean-up operations undertaken by Superfund have been caused by improper closure of hazardous waste accumulation units that are containers of hazardous waste in a CAA.

80 FR 57955 USEPA provided a list of Superfund clean-ups caused by LQGs who abandoned sites without proper closure of hazardous waste container CAAs.

Requirements for Closure of a Hazardous Waste Accumulation Unit (Container(s) in CAA):

Drum of corrosive hazardous waste

An example of a hazardous waste accumulation unit

If a large quantity generator of hazardous waste intends to permanently or temporarily halt the accumulation of hazardous in containers at a central accumulation area at its facility it must perform one of the following.

  1. Place a notice in the facility’s operating record within 30 days after closure of the hazardous waste accumulation unit.  Notice must identify the location of the unit within the facility.  If the waste accumulation unit is subsequently reopened, the generator may remove the notice from the operating record.

Or…

2.  Submit the notifications and meet the closure performance standards in the same manner as for closure of a facility (see below).

Notification:

  • LQG must notify EPA – or its state – no later than 30 days prior to closing the hazardous waste accumulation unit.  The notification must be made using the Federal 8700-12 Form unless your state has its own form for this purpose.
  • LQG must also notify EPA – or its state – within 90 days after closing the hazardous waste accumulation unit.  The notification must be made using the Federal 8700-12 Form unless your state has its own form for this purpose.  This notification must indicate whether the facility has complied with the closure performance standards (i.e. “clean close”, more on that later) or is unable to meet the closure performance standards and therefore must close under the regulations applicable to a landfill (more on that later too).
  •  LQG may be granted additional time to clean close if it does the following:
    • Notify EPA – or state- within 75 days of the submittal of the initial notification.
    • Notification must be made on EPA 8700-12 Form or the state equivalent.
    • Notification must include an explanation as to why the additional time is required.

Performance Standards for Clean Close:

Note: the information below is a summarized version of the regulations at §262.17(a)(8)(iii).  I attempted to capture the intent of the performance standard while avoiding the excessive descriptions found in the regulations.  Please read the regulations for a full description of the closure performance standards.

  • LQG must close each hazardous waste accumulation area at the facility to prevent the future release of any hazardous waste to the environment.
  • LQG must also remove or decontaminate all contaminated equipment, structures, soil, and any remaining hazardous waste.
  • Manage any hazardous waste generated during closure according to the regulations applicable to an LQG.

An LQG performing a clean close is not required to have a closure plan or financial assurance. (RO 14321)

Like this article?

Subscribe to my Monthly Newsletter

No marketing emails!

drum of hazardous waste in gas station parking lot

Another example of a hazardous waste accumulation unit

If Unable to Perform Clean Close:

If the LQG is unable to meet the closure performance standards (i.e. clean close) and can demonstrate that the contaminated soils and wastes cannot be practicably removed or decontaminated from any accumulation unit(s) the LQG must close the waste accumulation unit(s) and perform post-closure care per the regulations applicable to a landfill at §265.310 and subparts G and H of part 265.  Requirements for closure as a landfill include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Installing groundwater monitoring wells upgradient and downgradient from the container area.
  • Installing monitoring wells for 30 years or longer during a post-closure care groundwater monitoring program.

If you like this article, please share it using any of the social media platforms identified at the bottom of this article.

You’ll look real smart recommending my articles!

Conclusion:

In this order:

Q&A: How do I ship a Class 3 Flammable Liquid between the U.S. and Canada?

A recent customer of my Onsite HazMat Employee training followed-up with a question (08.15.17):

Hello Daniel,

Thank you again for your training last week. It was very informative.

We have a question regarding shipping between US and Canada, along with questions of how the customer would ship this material once in Canada. The safety data sheets (SDSs) are different between the US and Canada. This is making the Canadian distributor hold our shipment before receiving. Do we need to mark these shipments in accordance to the Canada SDS or the US SDS? Also, if we mark them according to the US SDS, does the distributor have to change the markings in order to ship within Canada? Thank you in advance for your assistance.

Best Regards,

SEVERAL SAFETY DATA SHEETS (SDS) WERE ATTACHED TO THE EMAIL

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

I held him off for a little bit:

I will be able to reply later this evening.

And I did reply that night after reviewing the SDS he had provided (08.15.17):

I will try to answer your questions below.

  • I cannot answer questions about the SDS with great confidence as it is a requirement of OSHA regulations with which I am not experienced.
  • However, under the new OSHA HazCom Standard as revised by OSHA’s adoption of the Global Harmonization System (GHS) an SDS should be the same throughout the world.  I have no explanation why section 2 of the SDS for Part A differs between the U.S. version and the Canadian.  It must be an error as it should be the same in both.
  • Section 14 appears to be incomplete in all four SDS.  It does not include a basic description for the HazMat under IATA or IMDG.
  • As addressed in my training, the U.S. and Canada have a reciprocal agreement for the transport of HazMat / Dangerous Goods between the two countries by highway or rail.  Read: The Transport of HazMat Between the U.S. and Canada.
  • Based on the information provided it appears that all of the materials are a Class 3 Flammable Liquid and the best shipping description is:  UN1133, Adhesives, 3, Packing Group II (or PG I. It depends on the initial boiling point and that data isn’t available on the SDS.)
  • The above shipping description should suffice in both U.S. and Canada.

I hope this helps.  Please don’t hesitate to contact me with any questions.

Contact me with any questions you may have about the transportation of hazardous materials by air, highway, vessel, or rail

International and Domestic

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

The next day he had another question:

Hello Daniel,

They are also claiming that, due to the flash point, we can’t ship limited Limited Quantity in strong outer packagingquantity. In your opinion is this the case?

And I had a quick answer ready for him:

They are incorrect. A Class 3 Flammable Liquid adhesive can be shipped as a limited quantity no matter the flash point. There are limits on the net quantity of the HazMat in the package based on the Packing Group which is determined, in part, on the HazMat’s flash point.  The limited quantity exception also has a limit on the gross weight of the package for all HazMat no matter the Packing Group.

Conclusion:

Here is a perfect example of a shipper relying on information provided by someone else to comply with the USDOT/PHMSA Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) for the transport in commerce of hazardous materials.  As the shipper of HazMat you must do everything you can to ensure the HazMat is transported safely.  One way to do this is training:  USDOT HazMat Employee, IATA for shippers and packers of dangerous goods by air, and IMO for shore-based personnel shipping dangerous goods by vessel.

Q&A: Is a UOM required as part of the shipping description on a hazardous material shipping paper?

A question from within the regulated community, August 8, 2017.  Sent from a contact form on my website:

I have a rather easy question but I would like some clarification.  Our company transports HM for a customer and I noticed something that looks a little off on their pre-printed HM BOL’s.  They list no Unit of Measure (e.g., 1 Tanker) however they list a volume in gallons before the HM description, for example: # of gallons – UN1170, Ethyl Alcohol, 3, PGII.

Per CFR §172.202(a)(5) it appears their BOL is printed incorrectly as it does no have a UOM.  Can this method be used and still remain in compliance with regulation?

My training tells me it should listed in this manner: 1 Tanker – UN1170 Ethyl Alcohol 3 PGII. # of gallons. Am I correct?

Regards,

My reply that same day:

Thank you for contacting me.  I will try to answer your question.  Please see below.

  • Per 49 CFR 172.202(a)(5) the total quantity of HazMat on a shipping paper (e.g. bill of lading) must be indicated by mass or volume and must include an indication of the unit of measure.
  • Per §172.202(a)(5)(iii) the following are excepted from the above requirement:  Bulk packages, provided some indication of the total quantity is shown.  e.g. “1 cargo tank” or “2 IBCs”.  In other words, the total quantity and UOM of a HazMat is not required for a tanker (aka: cargo tank).
  • Per §172.202(c)(1) the total quantity of the material must appear before or after, or both before and after the basic description.  Abbreviations may be used for UOM.
In sum:
  • The total quantity in gallons is not required on a shipping paper for a bulk packaging such as a tanker truck.  An indication of the total quantity e.g. “1 cargo tank” will suffice.
  • If a total quantity is displayed then a unit of measure must be displayed as well.  It is a violation to display the quantity in gallons and not have the unit of measure.

The safest thing to to is to remove the total quantity and unit of measure and go with just the indication of total quantity: “1 cargo tank” either before or after the basic description.

I hope this helps.

Please don’t hesitate to contact me with any other questions.

Like this article?

Subscribe to my Monthly Newsletter

No marketing emails!

But he still had some questions for me (08.08.17):

Relating your explanation below to my customers pre-printed HM BoL’s, it appears since they use a UOM in gallons on their pre-printed BoL’s they will need to hand write the total quantity (1 Tanker) after the basic description.  Will this meet compliance if done this way?

And I had a reply (08.08.17):

Please see below:

  • The total quantity in gallons is not required for a tanker.  Simply “1 tanker” will suffice for both the total quantity and the number and type of packaging.
  • If a total quantity in gallons is used it must also include the UOM.
  • If the BoL already displays the total quantity in gallons and the UOM then all that is required is the number and type of packaging.  In that case “1 tanker” will suffice.  The number and type of packaging can be displayed before or after the basic description.

I hope that answers your question?  If still unclear perhaps I will understand better if you email me a scanned copy of the BoL with the relevant information.

Interested in site specific training at your site that covers this topic, and more!

Ask me about my Onsite Training

Questioner did just what I requested and sent me a copy of the bill of lading:

I really appreciate your assistance.  I have attached a copy of the information in question.

Having the BoL in question in front of me was very helpful.  I now had a final answer ready:

I understand better now.  Unless I am missing something, the BoL does indicate the total quantity with the UOM.  The placement before the basic description is acceptable.  It is, however, lacking the number and type of packages required by §172.202(a)(7).  As you indicated earlier, this can be added after the basic description as “1 cargo tank”.

I hope THAT answers your question.

That was the answer he needed (08.09.17):

Daniel,

Thank you for your assistance, your guidance has helped.

Contact me with any questions you may have about the transportation of hazardous materials by air, highway, vessel, or rail

International and Domestic

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

FAQ: Whom do I contact if I have questions about the e-Manifest System?

FAQ: Whom do I contact if I have questions about the e-Manifest System?

If you’re confused about the use of the USEPA’s new e-Manifest System (launched on June 30, 2018), you’re not alone.  Despite a valiant effort to inform the regulated community of the new system and to work out the kinks, many problems remain and will likely persist well after 06.30.18.  The contact information below is provided by the USEPA to help answer the questions of people like you.

Questions about using the system?

e-Manifest Helpdesk for Industry Users
8:00 am ET – 6:00 pm ET
Toll Free: (833) 501-6826
Direct Line: (970) 494-5508
Email Helpdesk for Industry Users (helpdesk@epacdx.net)

e-Manifest Helpdesk for State Users
Contact EPA Regional contacts
Email Helpdesk for State Users (eManifest@epa.gov)

Contact me with any questions you may have about the generation, identification, management, and disposal of hazardous waste

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

If you have a question for me about the e-Manifest System, I’ll likely call these numbers and then reply.  This system is so new – and untried – that I don’t think anyone can consider themselves an expert.  Yet.  However, if you are affected by the e-Manifest System you may also be a generator of hazardous waste.  If you are, then you will require some form of Hazardous Waste Personnel training.

FAQ: Can USEPA provide additional time for receiving facilities to submit manifests and ease the burden of transitioning to the new e-Manifest System?

Yes. EPA recently decided to grant extra time for receiving facilities to submit paper manifests during the initial months after system launch (scheduled for June 30, 2018). Under EPA’s regulations, receiving facilities must submit paper manifests to EPA within 30 days of receipt. However, EPA will allow receiving facilities to submit paper manifests they receive between June 30, 2018, and September 1, 2018, by September 30, 2018. This effectively provides receiving facilities up to 60 additional days, over the existing 30 days provided in the regulations, to submit paper manifests to EPA.

This does not change the requirement for receiving facilities to send manifests initiated on and after June 30, 2018, to EPA and for EPA to then charge a user fee for each manifest it receives. Rather, it simply extends the deadline for when paper manifests would be due to EPA. There are three ways for receiving facilities to submit a paper manifest: (1) through the U.S. mail; (2) upload of a scanned image of the manifest; and (3) sending a data file plus a scanned image of the manifest. Once the paper manifest is received by EPA, EPA will charge a user fee for each manifest based on how the manifest was submitted and the corresponding costs to EPA to process the data. EPA charges the highest user fee for paper manifests mailed to the Agency, a lower fee for uploads of scanned images, and a lower fee still for manifests submitted as data files plus scanned images.

Contact me with any questions you may have about the generation, identification, management, and disposal of hazardous waste

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

(Receiving facilities, of course, can use electronic manifests/hybrid manifests, but as these manifests are signed electronically in EPA’s e-Manifest system and are submitted to the Agency instantaneously, the extra time to submit paper manifests is not applicable for these manifests. EPA charges the lowest user fee for electronic manifests.)

EPA believes that this additional time will allow receiving facilities to complete any steps necessary to modify their software systems and integrate them with e-Manifest so that they are in a better position to take advantage of the lower user fees for paper manifests submitted as “data plus image” uploads. Thus, this flexibility reduces costs to industry as well as reduces processing burden for EPA and sets up an important framework for entities to expedite their transition to fully electronic manifesting.Hazardous Waste TSDF

EPA encourages receiving facilities to submit paper manifests as soon as possible, rather than waiting until September 30, 2018. This will help both the receiving facility and EPA best manage, process, and bill for any manifests accumulated during this period.

Beginning on September 1, 2018, receiving facilities must submit all paper manifests to EPA within 30 days of receipt by the receiving facility, as required by the regulations.

Banned from Landfill in Illinois

The following information is derived from a document entitled: Summary of Illinois’ Solid Waste Legislation – dated April 18, 2013.  Be sure to check for updates!

Illinois does not have an omnibus law that deals with solid waste management issues; many separate pieces of legislation focus on waste reduction and recycling. The three major laws that impact and guide the programs and functions of the Division of Recycling and Waste Reduction, Illinois Energy Office, Illinois Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity’s (DCEO) are the following:

  • Illinois Solid Waste Management Act
  • Illinois Solid Waste Planning and Recycling Act
  • Illinois Environmental Protection Act (EPAct)

Contact me with any questions you may have about the generation, identification, management, and disposal of hazardous waste

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

The EPAct contains Illinois’ environmental regulations including provisions that prohibit a variety of items from being disposed of in Illinois’ landfills.
The following items are banned from Illinois’ landfills:

  • Yardwaste: Public Act 85-1430 banned landscape waste (grass, leaves and brush) from being landfilled effective July 1, 1990.
  • Lead-Acid Batteries (Car Batteries): Public Act 86-723 banned the landfilling of lead-acid batteries effective September 1, 1990.Liquid lead acid battery
  • Waste Tires: Public Act 86-452 (1989) banned whole used or waste tires from sanitary landfills effective July 1, 1994. (Pubic Act 93-839 eliminated DCEO’s share of the Used Tire Management.)
  • White Goods: Public Act 87-858 banned white goods (large appliances) from being landfilled effective July 1, 1994, unless the “white good components have been removed.” White goods include “all discarded refrigerators, ranges, water heaters, freezers, air conditioners, humidifiers and other similar domestic and commercial large appliance.” White good components include: “any chlorofluorocarbons refrigerant gas; any electrical switch containing mercury; and any device that contains or may contain PCBs in a closed system, such as a dielectric fluid for a capacitor, ballast or other component.” Additionally, landfills cannot accept “clean” white goods for disposal unless they participate in the Industrial Materials Exchange Service by communicating the availability of white goods.
  • Used oil in IBCUsed Oil: Public Act 87-1213 prohibited, beginning July 1, 1996, persons from knowingly mixing liquid used oil with any municipal waste that is intended for collection and disposal at a landfill. The law further stipulates that no owner or operator of a sanitary landfill shall accept liquid used oil for final disposal beginning July 1, 1996. For the purpose of this act “liquid used oil” shall not include used oil filters, rags, absorbent material used to collect spilled oil, or empty containers which previously contained virgin oil, re-refined oil or used oil.
  • Electronic Products: While not covered by the EPA Act, the Electronic Products Recycling and Reuse Act (415 ILCS 150/1 et seq.) bans many electronic products from being landfilled, This more recent law, signed and effective September 17, 2008 as amended in 2011, advances a producer responsibility model for dealing with end-of-life electronics generated in Illinois. Among other things, this legislation bans covered electronic devices from being landfilled in Illinois starting January 1, 2012. Covered electronic devices include computers, monitors, televisions and printers.

Mercury Thermostat Collection Act (415 ILCS 98/1 et seq.)  This law includes a prohibition on the disposal of out-of-service mercury-switch thermostats in a sanitary landfill, in addition to prohibiting the mixing of out-of-service mercury-switch thermostats with any other solid waste that is intended for disposal at a sanitary landfill (Section 50). This provision is similar to the landfill bans that apply to car batteries, waste tires and other end-of-life products.  This law also contains product stewardship provisions, similar to the Electronic Products Recycling and Reuse
Act. The key provisions include:

  • Requires heating, ventilation and cooling (HVAC) contractors or service technicians to recycle mercury switch thermostats that are taken out of service, beginning July 1, 2011.
  • Requires thermostat wholesalers (typically heating, plumbing and electrical supply businesses) to act as a collection point for out-of-service mercury thermostats, beginning July 1, 2011. Thermostat wholesalers not participating in the program are prohibited from selling or distributing thermostats.
  • Requires thermostat manufacturers to make collection containers available to all thermostat wholesalers and qualified HVAC contractors.  Retailers and qualified local government authorities may also request a collection container. Requires thermostat manufacturers to pay for the transportation of the collected mercury-switch thermostats to an appropriate recycling facility.
  • Requires thermostat manufacturers to develop and distribute educational materials to help make wholesalers and HVAC contractors aware of the requirements of the law.
  • Establishes goals for the collection of mercury-switch thermostats in the first four years of the program. Provides IEPA with authority for setting the collection goals for 2015 to 2020, and requires updates to the collection programs if the goals are not achieved. The law sunsets on January 1, 2021.

Both homeowners and businesses in Illinois need to be aware of the regulations banning certain wastes from landfill disposal.  It is the additional responsibility of businesses – and government agencies – to comply with the state and Federal regulations for the ‘cradle-to-grave’ management of the waste it generates on-site.  Keeping certain wastes out of the landfills is only one part of a waste generator’s responsibilities.

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

Shell Oil Refinery to pay Civil Penalty and Make Improvements to Facility Because of its Violations of RCRA Regulations

The Bullet:

USEPA issued a civil penalty of $142,664 and other costs to a Shell Oil Company refinery in Martinez, CA.  USEPA took action against the company after its inspections identified multiple violations of the hazardous waste regulations.  As part of the settlement reached the refinery must also spend $220,300 to make improvements to its facility to further reduce its potential to pollute the environment and it must provide $38,000 to the county to support its emergency response efforts.

Who:

  • U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA), Pacific Southwest Region (Region 9).
  • Shell Oil Products, a subsidiary of Shell Oil Company is the owner of a refinery in Martinez, CA.  The facility processes about 165,000 barrels of crude oil per day. It also makes asphalt, diesel, jet turbine fuel, petroleum coke, propane, residential fuel oils, and sulfur.

What:

USEPA has reached a settlement with Shell Oil Products over hazardous waste and risk management plan compliance at its crude oil refinery in Martinez, CA.  The settlement requires Shell Oil Products to take the following actions:

  • Pay a $142,664 civil penalty.
  • Under the terms of the settlement, Shell Oil will spend an estimated $220,300 to upgrade the area where heat exchanger equipment is cleaned to ensure that resulting hazardous materials are properly managed. Shell Oil will also develop and implement a plan for sampling stormwater to ensure the water is managed appropriately. Finally, Shell Oil will analyze materials generated from its laboratory activities to ensure that they are managed correctly.
  • Shell Oil has also agreed to spend about $38,000 to provide the Contra Costa Health Services Hazardous Materials Programs with equipment to stop leaks from sulfur dioxide containers, personal protective equipment, and handheld particulate meters (including backup batteries and chargers), which are used to monitor air quality.

Where:

The Shell Martinez Refinery, located on Pacheco Boulevard about 2 miles east of downtown Martinez, CA and south of the Carquinez Strait.  It is located in Contra Costa County.

When:

  • USEPA news release is dated June 4, 2018.
  • USEPA inspected the refinery in November 2014, March 2015, and again in November 2016.

Contact me with any questions you may have about the generation, identification, management, and disposal of hazardous waste

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

Why:

Violations found during the inspections include:

  • Failure to immediately notify the appropriate federal, state, and local emergency planning and response agencies immediately after an accidental release in December 2013.
  • Failure to determine if waste generated at the refinery was hazardous.  Read: What is the hazardous waste determination?
  • Failure to follow proper procedures for managing hazardous waste.
  • Failure to comply with Spill Prevention, Control, and Countermeasure rule requirements, such as using proper containers for fuel storage.
  • Failure to comply with Risk Management Plan Rule requirements, such as accurately reporting an accidental release worst-case scenario. When properly implemented, risk management plans and their associated program elements help prevent and control chemical releases at facilities that store large amounts of hazardous substances or flammable chemicals. These plans are also used by EPA and other emergency responders to assess chemical risks to nearby communities and prepare for emergency responses.

This action by USEPA and Shell Oil Products will prevent an estimated 64 tons of hazardous waste from being released to the environment every year and reduce the risk of diesel fuel spills to San Francisco Bay.

“Today’s order requires Shell Oil to make necessary enhancements to comply with federal laws and protect public health and our natural resources,” said EPA Pacific Southwest Regional Administrator Mike Stoker.

How:

California has its own authorized hazardous waste program administered by the Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) within the California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal EPA).  In this case, however, the USEPA was the lead agency in conducting the inspection and assessing the penalties.  Though a state may have an authorized hazardous waste program, the Federal government may still exercise its authority within that state.

Conclusion:

Another example of how a big company, one with enough resources to be able to research the regulations and to comply with them, has failed to do so.  Don’t let your company make the same mistakes and pay similar fines.  My high quality Hazardous Waste Personnel Training, whether delivered Onsite or as a Webinar, will instruct you and your employees on what they need to know to comply with these regulations.  The cost of training is cheap compared to the cost of non-compliance.

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

More Information:

Large Quantity Generator of Hazardous Waste Facility Closure

Large Quantity Generator of Hazardous Waste Facility Closure

A large quantity generator of hazardous waste (LQG) is subject to the RCRA regulations of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) for the cradle-to-grave management of its waste.  If the generator will cease the accumulation of hazardous waste at the site then it is necessary to comply with the closure regulations of 40 CFR 262.17(a)(8).  The specific generator closure provisions depend on the status of the generator and the types of accumulation units the facility used to store or treat hazardous waste.  The purpose of this article is to explain the regulatory responsibility of a large quantity generator of hazardous waste for the closure of its facility under new regulations codified by the Generator Improvements Rule.

Before we begin…

Regulations already in affect prior to May 30, 2017 required an LQG to take certain actions when closing its facility.  These regulations – originally found at §262.34(a)(1)(iv)(B) and now at §262.17(a)(8) – were clarified and strengthened as part of the Generator Improvements Rule.  The most significant change was the inclusion of container accumulation areas with the pre-existing closure regulations.

The Generator Improvements Rule has not – as of this writing – been adopted in all states.  This particular requirement of the rule must eventually be adopted by all states since it is more strict than existing regulations.  However, states have until July 1 of 2019 to adopt these more strict regulations.  Read: What is the status of the Generator Improvements Rule in my state?

Scope:

The requirements of §262.17(a)(8) are applicable to…

  • A LQG.  Neither a small quantity generator (SQG) nor very small quantity generator (VSQG) of hazardous waste are subject to these regulations. The minimal closure regulations applicable to a SQG that accumulates hazardous waste in a tank are found at §262.16(b)(3)(vi).  There are no closure requirements for a VSQG.  A treatment, storage, and disposal facility (TSDF) has its own closure regulations found in parts 264/265 of Title 40.

Not sure of your hazardous waste generator status?  Take this short survey

  • The accumulation of hazardous waste.  Wastes that are non-hazardous, hazardous but excluded or exempt by regulation, managed by the generator under an option other than hazardous waste (e.g. universal waste and used oil), or those regulated as a hazardous waste solely by a state are not subject to these USEPA closure regulations
  • The accumulation of hazardous waste in a central accumulation area (CAA), not a satellite accumulation area (SAA). §262.17(a)(8)(v) states this clearly.
  • The accumulation of hazardous waste in any of the four (4) hazardous waste accumulation units: containers, tanks, containment buildings, and drip pads.  Note: this article will focus solely on the closure requirement for hazardous waste accumulated in containers.
  • The closure of an accumulation unit and/or the closure of the facility.  Note: this article will address the requirements for closure of the facility.  If interested in the closure requirements for an accumulation unit read:  Large Quantity Generator Responsibilities for the Closure of a Hazardous Waste Container Accumulation Area.
    • The closure of an accumulation unit means hazardous waste accumulation will cease – even temporarily – at that location.  To further clarify: closure of a hazardous waste accumulation unit could be as simple as moving a 55-gallon drum used for the accumulation of a hazardous waste from one area of the facility to another.
    • The closure of a facility means hazardous waste accumulation will cease at that facility.

Contact me with any questions you may have about the generation, identification, management, and disposal of hazardous waste

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

The Purpose:

From RO14321:

These standards require the minimization of the need for further maintenance of the site, and the minimization or elimination of post-closure escape of hazardous waste or constituents into the environment.  These regulations also provide for the decontamination or removal of all contaminated equipment, structures, and soils.Old Hazardous Waste Container

The new closure regulations now subject LQGs accumulating hazardous waste in containers to the same closure regulations that apply to the other hazardous waste accumulation units: tanks, containment buildings, and drip pads.  Read more about the four hazardous waste accumulation units.

Requirements for Closure of a Facility:

If a large quantity generator of hazardous waste intends to permanently cease the accumulation of hazardous at its site it must make specific notifications and meet certain performance standards.

Notification:

  • LQG must notify EPA – or its state – no later than 30 days prior to closing the facility.  The notification must be made using the Federal 8700-12 Form unless your state has its own form for this purpose.
  • LQG must also notify EPA – or its state – within 90 days after closing the facility.  The notification must be made using the Federal 8700-12 Form unless your state has its own form for this purpose.  This notification must indicate whether the facility has complied with the closure performance standards (i.e. “clean close”, more on that later) or is unable to meet the closure performance standards and therefore must close under the regulations applicable to a landfill.
  •  LQG may be granted additional time to clean close if it does the following:
    • Notify EPA – or state- within 75 days of the submittal of the initial notification to close the facility.
    • Notification must be made on EPA 8700-12 Form or the state equivalent.
    • Notification must include an explanation as to why the additional time is required.

Performance Standards for Clean Close:

Note: the information below is a summarized version of the regulations at §262.17(a)(8)(iii).  I attempted to capture the intent of the performance standard while avoiding the excessive descriptions found in the regulations.  Please read the regulations for a full description of the closure performance standards.

  • LQG must close each hazardous waste container accumulation area – i.e. CAA – at the facility to prevent the future release of any hazardous waste to the environment.
  • LQG must also remove or decontaminate all contaminated equipment, structures, soil, and any remaining hazardous waste.
  • Any hazardous waste generated during closure must be managed as a hazardous waste by the LQG.

Sound like a lot?  Well, USEPA thinks it should be easy as long as you complied with the regulations during operations at the site (November 28, 2016 / 81 FR 85772):

Generally, if a LQG has been managing its hazardous waste in accordance with the LQG provisions including proper accumulation standards and spill clean-up, then clean closure will consist of removing the containers from the accumulation area.

The good news is that a LQG performing a clean close of its facility is not required to have a closure plan or financial assurance. (RO 14321)

And one more thing, if you are accumulating hazardous waste on a drip pad – unique to those within the wood preserving industry – there are closure performance standards specific to that accumulation unit at §262.17(a)(8)(iv).

Like this article?

Subscribe to my Monthly Newsletter

No marketing emails!

If Unable to Perform Clean Close:

If the LQG is unable to meet the closure performance standards (i.e. clean close) and can demonstrate that the contaminated soils and wastes cannot be practicably removed or decontaminated from any accumulation unit(s), then the waste accumulation unit(s) is considered to be a landfill and the LQG must close the waste accumulation unit(s) and perform post-closure care per the regulations applicable to a landfill at §265.310 and subparts G and H of part 265.  Requirements for closure as a landfill include, but are not limited to, the following:

  • Installing groundwater monitoring wells upgradient and downgradient from the container area.
  • Installing monitoring wells for 30 years or longer during a post-closure care groundwater monitoring program.

Conclusion:

Correct Management of Hazardous Waste Containers

Manage hazardous waste containers like this and facility closure should be easy!

If compliance with the regulations of §262.17 – Conditions for exemption for a large quantity generator that accumulates hazardous waste has been a practice at your facility, then its closure in compliance with §262.17(a)(8) should be nothing more than submitting notifications and removing any remaining hazardous waste.  If you are a LQG that doesn’t intend to close its facility, please contact me to arrange for your initial (within 90 days) and annual review of Hazardous Waste Personnel training for you and your employees.

Q&A: How do I dispose of hazardous waste generated by a household?

Q&A: How do I dispose of hazardous waste generated by a household?

Here’s a question I received from a distressed person with a problem back on August 2nd of 2017:

Hey Daniel,

Sorry for the unsolicited email but I’m not sure where to turn. I am cleaning out my dad’s house in <<City>> in Illinois and trying to figure out how to dispose of some normal household waste such as used oil, old gas, solvents, etc. No one can seem to tell me of a disposal site and the unspoken thread seems to be ‘don’t worry about it just drop it in the dumpster.’ Hmm, that’s not really responsible. Do you know of any collections events or sites?

I could sympathize with his distress having been in the same situation years before.  I was able to reply the same day:

Thank you for contacting me.  You are doing the right thing in trying to dispose of your waste properly.

Please refer to this link from the IEPA about HHW collection programs in IL.  Some highlights from the website:
  • 1 day collection programs are held throughout the state in the Spring and Fall.
  • You can request a program to be held in your city.
  • There is a permanent collection site in Rockford, IL open on the weekends.
  • Used oil can be brought to registered collection centers (e.g. oil change shops).
  • Latex paint can be solidified and disposed of in trash.
  • There are options for rechargeable batteries as well.
I hope this helps.
Please don’t hesitate to contact me with any other questions.

Like this article?

Subscribe to my Monthly Newsletter

No marketing emails!

I think I was able to help him where others didn’t because his reply was quick and exuberant:

Awesome! I’ll give this a shot:  Household Hazardous Waste Disposal / Permanent Site / 3333 Kishwaukee / Rockford, IL

Thanks,

Conclusion:

It is unfortunate that a private citizen had so much trouble trying to do the right thing.  Of course, the easiest thing to do would have been to dump the waste down the drain or set it out with the trash, but that is not what is best for the environment.  You may be asking yourself, “Why isn’t this person subject to the hazardous waste regulations when a business – generating the same waste – must comply?”  The answer is that at the beginning of the hazardous waste program created by RCRA the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) decided that its regulations would apply to businesses, government agencies, and commercial enterprises – i.e. a person – but not to a private citizen as a homeowner or other businesses similar to a residence such as a hotel.  The regulations codified this decision in the Household Hazardous Waste Exclusion found at 40 CFR 261.4(b)(1).

While the caller never became a customer, they did help me by reviewing my services and posting it for all to see.  You can do this too!  If you like this article or I have ever been of service to you, please take just one minute to tell the world about it!
FAQ: What does USDOT mean by a “contract carrier”?

FAQ: What does USDOT mean by a “contract carrier”?

USDOT/PHMSA regulations at 49 CFR 173.29(c) for transport of empty packagings refer to a “contract carrier” but the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) do not define this term.  (Neither does it define “common carrier” or “private carrier”, other terms used in the same section of the regulations.)  What then is a “contract carrier” as the term is used by USDOT/PHMSA?

The first place to look for the definition of a word or term used by the HMR is 171.8 – Definitions.  But you won’t find any mention of “contract carrier” there.

Contact me with any questions you may have about the transportation of hazardous materials by air, highway, vessel, or rail

International and Domestic

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

Sometimes a term used only by a specific section of the HMR will be defined in that section.  But no luck finding the definition of “contract carrier” in §173.29 either.

Perhaps it can be found in the regulations of the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (a sister administration to PHMSA within the USDOT), since it is the one that regulates commercial motor vehicles?  However, “Since January 1, 2007 FMCSA has been required by law not to distinguish between common and contract carriers, as they were previously defined.”  Due to a loop-hole in the regulations this did not go into affect until January 17, 2017.  Read about it on the FMCSA website.Cargo Tank Truck of Compressed Gas

An indication of what USDOT/PHMSA means by the term “contract carrier” can be found in this letter of interpretation from July 25, 2003 (02-0259):

The term “contract carrier” is used in the HMR in the same manner as in the former Interstate Commerce Act (“the Act, “now repealed) to mean a person who transports by motor vehicle, for compensation, passengers or property in commerce “under continuing contracts with one person or a limited number of persons either (a) for the furnishing of transportation services through the assignment of motor vehicles for a continuing period of time to the exclusive use of such person served or (b) for the furnishing of transportation services designed to meet the distinct need of each individual customer.”

And further…

A contract carrier provides “specialized service” to its customers…”

So, in my words, a contract carrier operates under a contract to provide specific transportation services – by motor vehicle over a public roadway – to a single person or limited number of persons.