marine pollutant

Q&A: What do I do with a Marine Pollutant in a non-bulk packaging?

Q&A: What do I do with a Marine Pollutant in a non-bulk packaging?

Question1:

Good Afternoon Daniel,

Our company recently noticed some label changes on a product we use and sometimes ship to our customers. Recently, we’ve begun seeing a class 9 UN3077 label as well as a “marine pollutant” pictogram. I’m aware of the marine pollutant exception in 49CFR 171.4 (c) that states non bulk packages are unregulated unless offered for vessel transport (i.e. on land)

The product in question comes in 5 gallon pails, and weigh ~50 lbs. The product is defined as a “solid” by the manufacturer.

My question is, is the “non-bulk” receptacle weight of 882 lbs per “bucket” or gross weight of all buckets combined? Is there a limit of how many “non-bulk” containers we can ship without being regulated?

Hopefully this isn’t too confusing as I’m trying to make sense of this just to ask my questions.

Thanks,

Answer1:

Thank you for contacting me. You have the right idea. Please see below.

  • For transportation on the ground in the U.S. a non-bulk packaging is not subject to regulation as a marine pollutant.
  • The determination of a bulk or non-bulk packaging is based on the capacity of an individual packaging. It is not based on the gross weight of the package or the combined weight of the consignment.

So…

  • A 5-gallon pail weighing 50 lb – and therefore a non-bulk packaging – can not be a marine pollutant when transported on the ground in the U.S. It does not matter if there is one 5-gallon pail or 500 of them on the truck.
  • Read: What is a bulk packaging?
  • Read: What is a marine pollutant?

I hope this helps. Please contact me with any other questions.

Contact me with any questions you may have about the transportation of hazardous materials by air, highway, vessel, or rail

International and Domestic

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

Question2:

Thank you Daniel. Now that we have the marine pollutant question out of the way, I have another question. The product is also labeled as a UN3077 Class 9 hazmat. It is of my understanding that class 9 misc. hazmat is exempt from placarding, and all hazmat’s are exempt as long as you transport <1,001 lbs. The only requirements we’d have to comply with are marking the material correct? Would employees need hazmat training and would the shipment have to be shipped with a hazardous materials manifest?

Thank you,

Answer2:

You are partially correct. Please see below.

  • You are correct that it is not required to display the Class 9 Miscellaneous placard on a vehicle when operated in the U.S. regardless of the quantity or packaging of the Class 9 Miscellaneous.
  • You are not entirely correct that all HazMat is exempt from placarding below 1,001 lb.
    • Some HazMat must be placarded regardless of amount or packaging if they are included in Placard Table 1 (e.g., Dangerous When Wet).
    • Some HazMat must be placarded regardless of amount if in a bulk packaging (even one drop).
    • However, for HazMat in Placard Table 2 (most of ’em) and in a non-bulk packaging, the display of placards is not required if the aggregate gross weight is less than 454 kg (1,001 lb).
  • Though not required to display placards, all the remaining HazMat Regulations apply to the transportation of a Class 9 Miscellaneous (and any other HazMat that does not require the display of placards):
    • Package marks & labels.
    • HazMat shipping paper with emergency information.
    • HazMat Employee training for all personnel involved in its transportation. Also, Driver Training for operators of motor vehicles.

I can provide HazMat Employee training including Driver Training.

Please contact me with any other questions.

Conclusion:

Questions about marine pollutants are common. This is, in part, due to the fact that the classification of a Marine Pollutant per the HMR differs from its classification in the dangerous goods regulations of IATA & IMO.

No matter your HazMat / dangerous good or the mode of transport, I can provide the training you need to comply with both domestic and international regulations.

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

More Information:
  • The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration within the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT/PHMSA) creates and enforces the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) for the transportation of hazardous materials (HazMat) to, from, or through the U.S.
  • The Dangerous Goods Regulations of the International Air Transport Association (IATA) are produced in consultation with the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and are the guide recognized by the world’s commercial airlines for the transportation of dangerous goods by air.
  • The International Maritime Organization (IMO) is the source of the Dangerous Goods Code for the international transportation of dangerous goods by vessel.
Q&A: Is the marine pollutant label required for transport by ground?

Q&A: Is the marine pollutant label required for transport by ground?

(June 26, 2020) A question from a customer of mine:

hi Daniel

I am shipping two boxes of un3077 environmentally hazardous substances, solid., n.o.s. ( dibutyl phthalate), 9, III. This is going ground to Texas. my question is do we have to put the marine pollutant label if its going ground.

I know marine pollutant labels is required for some going ocean. I am also wondering do we have to apply this label if its going air with the class 9.
thanks for your help.

Contact me with any questions you may have about the transportation of hazardous materials by air, highway, vessel, or rail

International and Domestic

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

Marine pollutant mark on non-bulk packaging

A non-bulk packaging transported by ground in the U.S. is not subject to regulation as a marine pollutant.

My reply that same day:

Thank you for contacting me. Please see below.

  • A marine pollutant is classified by USDOT/PHMSA for transportation within the U.S. as follows:
    • It must be identified by name in Appendix B of the Hazardous Materials Table at 49 CFR 172.101 (the Marine Pollutant Table).
    • The named marine pollutant must be at a concentration in a solution or mixture of 10% or more for a marine pollutant or 1% or more for a severe marine pollutant.
    • The substance must be transported in any packaging (bulk or non-bulk) by vessel or in a bulk packaging by highway, rail, or aircraft.
  • Your email does not indicate if the two boxes are bulk packaging or non-bulk packaging. Based on my knowledge of your operations I will presume them to be a non-bulk packaging.
  • A non-bulk packaging transported by highway within the U.S. can not be a marine pollutant subject to the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) of the USDOT/PHMSA.
  • Also, dibutyl phthalate is not identified as a marine pollutant in the Marine Pollutant Table, so that’s strike three right there.
  • Unless subject to the HMR as a hazardous material for some other reason, this substance will not be regulated as a hazardous materials when offered for transport by highway within the U.S.
  • You are correct that the classification of a marine pollutant subject to the International Maritime Organization Dangerous Goods Code (IMDG Code) differs from that of USDOT/PHMSA. It is quite possible this substance is a marine pollutant subject to the IMDG Code. More information is necessary to make that classification. If a marine pollutant per the IMDG Code and it does not display any other hazards, e.g., flammability, corrosivity, it will be classified as a Class 9 Miscellaneous.
  • If to be transported by air, the Dangerous Goods Regulations of the International Air Transport Association (IATA) will apply. IATA classifies a marine pollutant in the same manner as the IMO, therefore, it is quite possible (more information is necessary to be certain) this substance is a marine pollutant – and therefore a Class 9 Miscellaneous as well – when transportation is by air.

I hope this helps. Please contact me with any other questions.

And that did it!

it does help thank you

Also…

Q&A: Is my product a marine pollutant? A limited quantity? A hazardous material?

A question June 16, 2020:

Good afternoon Daniel. I hope you are doing well.

I have a question for you that I hope you can help me to clear up.

We have this product available in 11 oz tubes (caulking), 1 gallon plastic containers and 5 gallon buckets. See below for SDS Transportation section…Section 14 of SDS for Marine Pollutant

My question is regarding whether or not this item is regulated and needs to be noted on a BOL or requires markings or labels for over the road shipments (DOT).

I noticed the Remarks below stating that labeling is not required when shipping non-bulk loads.

Are we able to ship this without any requirement for noting it on the BOL or any markings or labels needed?

Curious about what is required (if anything) on these:

  • 11 oz tubes
  • 1 gallon tub
  • 5 gallon bucket

Appreciate your help on this Daniel.

Thank you in advance.

My reply the same day:

I can assist you. Please see below.

  • Sections 12-15 of the SDS are not authorized for use within the U.S. I prefer to see the entire SDS.
  • Based on the information in section 14 (see bullet point above), this material is a marine pollutant per international and domestic regulations.
  • Per international and domestic regulations a marine pollutant in a single or combination packaging of 5 L / 5 kg or less is not subject to international or domestic regulation. Yours likely will be above these thresholds and therefore not eligible for the exception. Read: The Marine Pollutant Exception
  • Within the U.S. transport by highway, rail, or air (unlikely) of a marine pollutant is not subject to any regulation if it is in a non-bulk packaging i.e., ≤454 L (119 gal).

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

In sum:

  • If the material is indeed a marine pollutant (not certain, but we’ll assume it is) it is not subject to any USDOT/PHMSA regulations when transported in commerce within the U.S. by highway or rail in the packaging quantities you indicate.
  • If ever transported in a packaging with a capacity of more than 119 gallons, it may be subject to regulation as a Class 9 Miscellaneous, Marine Pollutant.

I hope this helps. Please contact me with any other questions.

Marine Pollutant Mark

Marine Pollutant mark

He still had questions, so the next day:

Thank you Daniel.

I have attached the complete SDS copies for both products.

Firstly, I don’t completely understand your first bullet point from your email yesterday. Why is Section 12-15 not authorized for use within the U.S.?

Secondly, I am confused where the SDS states in Section 14 – Environmental hazards – Marine pollutant: it says “No” but directly under this it says Yes (DOT). What do they mean here?

Then in the Transport/Additional information: it says “not regulated if under 5 L or less for liquids (that’s fine for the 11 oz and 1 gallon product but what about the 5 gallon bucket?

Then again lower, the DOT shows nothing but immediately below it has “Remarks” and it talks about transport labeling is not required for non-bulk package shipments by motor vehicle. Are they talking about just labeling (no fish symbol needed)? Does this mean we do not need to label the 5 gallon buckets? I’m so confused…

I guess I need help in understanding the sequence of the SDS and which requirement I am to follow.

Additionally, I need to determine if the product in 11 oz tubes and 1 gallon tubs are required to have a “Limited Quantity” Label on the package?

Perhaps when you shed more light on the entire subject pertaining to the two SDSs attached, I might be able to understand how you are arriving at what is required and I will be able to apply that to other materials we have.

Thank you again for all your help Daniel.

Looking forward to your response.

Like this article?

Subscribe to my Monthly Newsletter

No marketing emails!

I could sense he was struggling to understand it all. (I know how he feels).

I can provide some clarification. Please see below.

  • When the SDS was authorized for use by OSHA in the U.S., it did not include authorization for sections 12-15. Many other countries in the world authorize these sections but we don’t in the U.S. Therefore, I do not rely entirely on the information in sections 12-15 of the SDS. I have found incorrect information there.
  •  I’m not certain either what is meant by the “no” and “yes” in section 14. It appears to me (based solely on section 14) that the manufacturer has identified this as a marine pollutant.
  • As my article on the Marine Pollutant Exception indicates (see previous email) a marine pollutant in a packaging of less than 5 L / 5 kg is not subject to domestic or international regulations as a marine pollutant.
  • Separate from the above, solely within the U.S. a marine pollutant in a non-bulk packaging is not subject to any regulation (see my article). That means you can ship it as if it was water.
  • You are only required to display the limited quantity mark Limited Quantity in strong outer packagingif using the limited quantity exception. The LQ exception may only be used if you have a fully-regulated HazMat. Based on section 14 of the SDS, you do not have a fully-regulated HazMat. The LQ mark is not required.

Please let me know if I can be of any further assistance.

Just one more question:

One other quick question regarding the same products and SDS as we were dealing with earlier.

We sometimes put these on a barge from Seattle to Alaska.

Vessel or barge transporting HazMat

Do we need to fill out the shipping papers, add markings and apply the Misc 9 and fish labels?

I’m sorry this product is so confusing to me.

Thank you.

One more Answer:

Please see below.

  • Transport by vessel is subject to USDOT and international regulation unless the quantity in a single or combination packaging is less than 5 kg / 5 L.
  • Some of the packagings you indicated may be below that threshold, others (5 gallon) are not. Therefore, some will be subject to full regulation as a HazMat and some will not.
And that seemed to do it!

That’s awesome!

Thank you again Daniel.

Have a great week!

Contact me with any questions you may have about the transportation of hazardous materials by air, highway, vessel, or rail

International and Domestic

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

Conclusion:

The classification of a product offered for transportation to determine if it is a hazardous material, and if yes, what kind. Is the most important responsibility of a HazMat shipper. Only by doing this correctly can the shipper hope to pack, label, mark, prepare a shipping paper, offer placards, provide emergency information, and perform every other regulated function of a HazMat shipper.

I can help you by answering questions and by providing the training required for anyone with a direct affect on the safe transportation of hazardous materials.

Q&A: How do I classify a Class 3 Combustible Liquid for both international and domestic transport?

This e-mail was sent from a contact form on Daniels Training Services (https://danielstraining.com) on December 05, 2019

Hello,

I am trying to name a chemical for transport. It has a flashpoint of 81 C. It is not a US DOT marine pollutant, but it is an IMDG marine pollutant. We ship in both bulk and non-bulk packaging, both domestically and internationally. I believe the US DOT name would be NA1993, combustible liquids, n.o.s. (name), 3, III -is that correct?

I am having a hard time with the IATA and IMDG name. Would those still be the NA1993? I know that NA1993 isn’t recognized internationally, so I am little confused as how this should be named. Any help you can provide with the naming would be greatly appreciated!!

Like this article?

Subscribe to my Monthly Newsletter

No marketing emails!

My reply December 10th:

Thank you for contacting me.  I apologize for my delay. I will review and reply.  Please advise on the below.

  • What is the chemical? Do you have an SDS?
  • What makes it an IMDG marine pollutant?
  • What is the expected capacity of the packaging: <5 L / 5 kg? <119 gallons? >119 gallons?
  • Does transport begin or end in the U.S.?

Thank you and please advise.

Answer:

Hello Daniel,

Thanks for taking the time to help me with this!!

  • The product is a blend of basic epoxy resin (casRn 25085-99-8) and Oxirane, 2-(butoxymethyl)- (casRn 2426-08-6); flash point 81 °C
  • No, we do not have a SDS. We are trying to make one and the SDS author asked me to assist in the naming.
  • It is IMDG marine pollutant because it meets the UN model regulation criteria for classification as a Chronic Aquatic Toxicity Cat 2.
  • When we make a SDS, we include the names for each package type and mode of transport. We ship 1L to 20L/5 gallon samples, 55 gallon drums, and 275 gallon totes
    • 1L to 5 gallon samples ship by ground or air both domestically and internationally
    • 55 gallon drums and 275 gallon totes ship by ground domestically and by vessel internationally
  • Transport begins in the US

Thanks,

Interested in site specific training at your site that covers this topic, and more!

Ask me about my Onsite Training

It was after Christmas, (12.27.19) but I got him an answer:

I will try to answer you questions.  Please see below.

  • Based on the flash point it is a Class 3 Combustible Liquid per USDOT regulations.
  • A material with a flash point higher than 60 degrees C is not subject to international regulations (IATA or IMO).
  • Based on your information it is not a marine pollutant per USDOT regulation but is a marine pollutant per international regulations.
  • A combustible liquid is not subject to USDOT regulation if transported by highway or rail within the U.S. and in a non-bulk packaging (and other conditions).
  • A non-bulk packaging of this material is not subject to USDOT regulations within the U.S. In a bulk packaging it is a Class 3 Combustible Liquid.  NA1993, combustible liquids, n.o.s. (name), 3, III may be the proper shipping description if a more specific name is not available.  There may be other shipping names that are more descriptive of the HazMat.
  • The material is subject to international regulation as a marine pollutant unless subject to the marine pollutant exception (packaging of less than 5 L or 5 Kg).
  • USDOT regulations allow a non-HazMat to be classified as a marine pollutant within the U.S. if subject to international regulation as a marine pollutant.

Also:

  • Section 14 of the SDS is not required to be completed within the U.S.
My suggestion:
  • Classify as marine pollutant for all transport.
  • Classify as Class 3 Combustible Liquid only when in bulk packaging within the U.S.  All other transport is non-HazMat.

Contact me the next time your USDOT, IATA (air), or IMO (vessel) training is due to expire.

Read:

I hope this helps.  Please don’t hesitate to contact me with any other questions.

His reply December 30th:

Thanks Daniel! This was very useful!!

Q&A: Display of the Class 9 Miscellaneous Placard and the Marine Pollutant Mark

Question (April 09, 2018):
Hello. I work for an ltl carrier and was wondering if I need to placard for class 9 un 3082 marine pollutant. The tote has a placard, along with the fish sticker. Thanks for your timeMarine Pollutant in IBC
My reply the same day:

Thank you for contacting me.  I will answer your question below.

  • Display of the Class 9 Miscellaneous placard is not required within the U.S.
  • However, if transporting a bulk packaging the identification number (3082) must be displayed on all four sides of the vehicle unless the identification number displayed on the tote is visible during transport, e.g., the totes are loaded on a flat-bed trailer and the identification number is visible.
  • I assume the contents of the tote meets the definition of a marine pollutant.
  • Per 49 CFR 172.322(c) a vehicle that transports a packaging that is marked as a marine pollutant must display the marine pollutant mark (at the size of a placard) on all four sides.
  • However, the marine pollutant mark is not required to be displayed if some other placard is displayed.

Class 9 Miscellaneous placard on truckOptions:

  • Display Class 9 placard with ID number (3082) and marine pollutant mark.
  • Display Class 9 placard with ID number w/o marine pollutant mark.
  • Display marine pollutant mark with ID number w/o Class 9 placard.
Your best option may be to display the Class 9 placard with the identification number on all 4 sides of the vehicle.
I hope this helps.  Please contact me with any other questions.

Like this article?

Subscribe to my Monthly Newsletter

No marketing emails!

Conclusion:

The Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) of the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration within the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT/PHMSA) are especially tricky when the issues of marine pollutants and Class 9 Miscellaneous come up.  This question dealt with both!

Another issue not addressed in this exchange – though relevant to the questioner – is the difference between domestic and international regulations for the classification of marine pollutants and the display of the Class 9 Miscellaneous placard.  It is quite possible that a substance delivered to your site as a marine pollutant in a vehicle or freight container displaying the Class 9 placard may not be a HazMat at all when you offer it for transport (i.e., ship) it from your site.  This is because the rest of the world classifies a marine pollutant differently than we do here in the U.S. and the rest of the world requires the display of the Class 9 placard 

Complicated?  Yes.  But understandable when explained properly through training:

Contact me with any questions you may have about the transportation of hazardous materials by air, highway, vessel, or rail

International and Domestic

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

Q&A: Is this a marine pollutant?

A question.  December 5, 2017:

Good afternoon, I’m looking for some clarification on class 9 hazmat material.

One of our customers, their product is considered a class 9 Marine Pollutant, we have always been instructed that this only needed to be classified as a pollutant if going over international waters.  All I can find online is that it does not need to be placard, only marked and identified on the BOL.   My question is when getting quotes from or LTL carriers do we need to be getting this quoted as hazmat material, or can we quote as normal material since we do not cross any bodies of water, except rivers.

Reading through your sight has cleared a lot of things up, one question I do have is on the Bulk.  Our customers packaged: 1) plastic bag, then in a box. 2) in a box.  Most boxes are packaged at 25kg. then shipments are pallatized, boxes per pallet range from 5-40 boxes (100 kg to 1000 kg).  Since each form of the product is boxed in 25kg packages is this considered bulk even though it is not all “together”

Contact me with any questions you may have about the transportation of hazardous materials by air, highway, vessel, or rail

International and Domestic

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

My reply that same day:

Thank you for contacting me.  I will try to answer your question below.

  • Per USDOT regulations a marine pollutant must meet three criteria (read: What is a Marine Pollutant?):
    • ID’d by name in table of marine pollutants.  Found in Appendix B to the Hazardous Materials Table at 49 CFR 172.101.
    • Above concentration threshold:  10% or more for a marine pollutant, 1% or more for a severe marine pollutant.
    • Transported by vessel or in a bulk packaging.  Read:  Bulk Packaging for HazMat Explained!  Therefore, even if transported by highway or rail, it is possible to have a marine pollutant if it is in a bulk packaging.
  • If classified as a marine pollutant and it does not meet the criteria of any other hazard class it must be classified as a Class 9 Miscellaneous.  All other HazMat regulations apply but a Class 9 is not required to display the Class 9 Miscellaneous placard on the vehicle.  Read: Is the Class 9 Placard Required?
  • Since a Class 9 does not require the display of a placard, the driver of the motor vehicle transporting it does not require the HazMat endorsement on the CDL.  However, it is still regulated as a hazardous material which means the driver – and all others involved in its transportation – must have HazMat Employee training (I provide this training).
  • What you describe (“…1) plastic bag, then in a box. 2) in a box.”) is not a bulk packaging.  It is an overpack, which is subject to its own regulations.
I hope this helps.  Please don’t hesitate to contact me with any other questions.

Q&A: Is stoddard solvent a marine pollutant?

A question posted to pcjr101@yahoo.com [hazmat101] hazmat101@yahoogroups.com on November 1, 2017:

Is Stoddard Solvent a marine pollutant per DOT or IMDG Code? Under what scenarios? What about a mixture with it?  References to guidance documents are appreciated.

Stoddard Solvent is sometimes referred to a White Spirit or Turbine Substitute

49 CFR Appendix B to 172.101 (List of Marine Pollutants):Marine Pollutant Mark

  • Lists “White Spirit, low (15-20%) aromatic) as a Marine pollutant.
  • Lists “Turbine” (UN299) as a Marine Pollutant
  • Does not list “Turpentine Substitute” (UN1300) as a Marine Pollutant.

The IMDG  Code Index:

  • Lists “White Spirit, low (15-20%) aromatic) (UN1300) as a Marine pollutant.
  • Lists “White Spirit” (UN1300)  as a Marine pollutant.
  • Lists “Turpentine” (UN1299) as a Marine pollutant.
  • Lists “Turpentine Substitute” (UN1300) as a Marine pollutant.
IMDG Code 2018 Edition

2018 Edition of the IMDG Code

The IMDG Code Dangerous Goods List:

  • Lists UN1299 (Turpentine) as a marine pollutant
  • Does not list UN1300 (Turpentine Substitute) as a marine Pollutant.

Thanks in advance.

Contact me with any questions you may have about the transportation of hazardous materials by air, highway, vessel, or rail

International and Domestic

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

Note: this group allows its members to post questions like this one and then hope for answers from others within the group.  What follows are some of those answers with mine at the end.

First to answer…

Stoddard Solvent is Mineral Spirits. UN 1268, PETROLEUM DISTILLATES , N.O.S. (Naphtha solvent), 3, PG III, combustible liquid

And…

Check the SDS for that product

And then me:

I will try to answer your question.  Please see below.

General information:

  • White spirit or mineral spirits, also known as mineral turpentine, turpentine substitute, petroleum spirits, solvent naphtha, Varsol, Stoddard solvent, or, generically, “paint thinner”.

USDOT/PHMSA:

  • To be a marine pollutant per USDOT/PHMSA regulations it must be each of the following:
    • Identified by name as a marine pollutants (appendix B to Hazardous Materials Table at 49 CFR 172.101).
    • 10% or more in solution if marine pollutant.  1% or more in solution if a severe marine pollutant (identified by ‘PP’ in column 1 of list).
    • Transported in any size packaging by vessel or transported in a bulk packaging by highway, rail, or air.
  • White Spirit, low (15-20%) aromatic is identified by name as a marine pollutant.
  • Turpentine is identified by name as a marine pollutant.
  • Read:  What is a Marine Pollutant?

It is impossible to determine if your product is a marine pollutant per USDOT/PHMSA regulations without first identifying exactly what it is and its concentration, packaging, and mode of transport.

IMO:
  • To be a marine pollutant per the IMO dangerous goods code (IMDG), it must be one of the following:
    • Display a ‘P’ in the ‘MP’ column for its entry in the Index.
    • Display a ‘P’ in column 4 of the Dangerous Goods List (DGL) for its entry.
    • Meet the criteria of the UN Recommendations (2.9.3) for an Environmentally Hazardous Substance (aquatic environment).
  • If identified as a marine pollutant in either the Index or the DGL it is not subject to regulation as a marine pollutant if it does not meet the UN criteria.
  • If not identified as a marine pollutant in either the Index or the DGL it is subject to regulation as a marine pollutant if it is proven to meet the UN criteria.
  • White Spirit, low (15-20%) aromatic, white spirit, & TURPENTINE are all identified as a marine pollutant in the Index.

Unless the shipper has data to indicate it does not meet the criteria for an environmentally hazardous substance (aquatic environment), then the above identified substances must be shipped as a marine pollutant when subject to the IMDG Code.

And…
  • 49 CFR 172.101, Appendix B (4):  if not listed as a marine pollutant but meets criteria for marine pollutant per IMDG, then may be transported as marine pollutant within U.S.
  • 49 CFR 172.101, Appendix B (5):  if listed as a marine pollutant but does not meet criteria for marine pollutant per IMDG, then may be excepted from transport as marine pollutant within U.S. with approval from PHMSA/USDOT.
  • The International Air Transport Association (IATA) uses the same UN criteria as the IMO for classifying a marine pollutant.
More information:

I hope this helps.

Please contact me with any other questions.

If you like this article, please share it using any of the social media platforms identified at the bottom of this article.

You’ll look real smart recommending my articles!

Conclusion:

The classification of a marine pollutant is complicated.  It is made more so by the fact that the classification of a marine pollutant of USDOT/PHMSA within the U.S. differs from the international regulations of IATA & IMO. That means the requirements for transport of a HazMat within the U.S. may differ from those outside of the U.S.  Make certain you determine the applicable regulations and them comply with them.

Q&A: The Marine Pollutant Exception

This is a question from a customer of mine.  I had provided them with HazMat Employee Training (to meet USDOT regulations), training for the shippers and packers of dangerous goods by air as required by the International Air Transport Association (IATA) and also training for shore-based personnel for dangerous goods by vessel per the International Maritime Organization (IMO).  Afterwards, they had some questions for me about specific shipping challenges.  Like all of my customers, I happily answered their questions at no cost.  For this particular question the customer had already sent me a Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for the product they wished to ship.  We had had a brief telephone conversation where I informed them the product was a marine pollutant and was subject to an exception.

Marine Pollutant MarkThe question (01.09.17):

Daniel –

During our conversation, you said that the IMO and IATA laid out an exception for the product I sent you the SDS for, where as long as it’s in an inner packaging ≤ 5L, it isn’t regulated per IATA.
A) Did I understand you correctly (is that true)?
B) Where did you see that? I’m just looking over the SDS and can’t find anything that would have tipped you off to that information, and I would like to read that exception myself.
C) Is that exception (if it is as I understand it) for the raw material itself, or for the UN 3082 entirely?
Also, did that exception also remove the Ltd. Qty. ‘G’ limitation?
Thanks for your help.
My reply the same day:
Please see below:
  • USDOT, IMO, & IATA have an exception from regulation specific to Marine Pollutants if they are below 5 kg/5 L per package.
  • The exception is not referenced in the SDS.  It can be found as follows:
    • 49 CFR 171.4 of the USDOT HMR.
    • Special Provision A197 of the IATA DGR, referenced from 7.1.5.3.
    • 2.10.2.7 of the IMO Dangerous Goods Code.
  • The exception would apply to any substance that meets the criteria for a marine pollutant.  The exception only applies to it as a a marine pollutant and does not except it from any other regulations.  For example, if a marine pollutant is also a Class 3 Flammable Liquid, it may be subject to the above marine pollutant exception but would remain regulated as a Class 3 Flammable Liquid.
  • The marine pollutant exception has nothing to do with the limited quantity exception.  The ‘G’ in the Dangerous Goods List only applies if you are shipping the HazMat as a limited quantity.
I hope that helps.
Please don’t hesitate to contact me with any other questions.
Some follow-up from the customer:

Daniel –

Thank you so much for your thorough response.
Correct me if I’m wrong, but wouldn’t the Special Provision A197 supersede the Limited Quantity exception in regard to relief of shipping limitations? Basically, as long as we are following the Special Provision, and not shipping it Ltd. Qty., my understanding is that the special provision allows us to ship the product un-regulated, therefore not being subject to any gross weight limitations as long as it’s being shipped below 5kg/L. Is that true?
I just want to make sure that I’m interpreting all of this accurately before I make my case to UPS HazMat. 🙂
Thanks again for your patience with us on this.
My reply:

You are correct.  Sequence is:

  1. Classify to determine if HazMat/dangerous good.
  2. If yes, determine if exception applies.  In this case, both the marine pollutant exception and the limited quantity exception apply.
  3. Choose exception to use or ship as fully regulated HazMat.
  4. If shipping per marine pollutant exception, then material is not regulated (i.e. not HazMat/dangerous good) as long as you comply with the requirements of the exception.
  5. The gross package weight limits of the limited quantity exception only apply if you choose to use that exception.  You are not doing that in this case.
Please don’t hesitate to contact me with any other questions.

Contact me with any questions you may have about the transportation of hazardous materials by air, highway, vessel, or rail

International and Domestic

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

Conclusion:
This exchange represents a common challenge of complying with the Hazardous Materials Regulations: that of taking things step-by-step in an orderly process.  As my last email to the customer details, there is a process to compliance.  An action taken out of sequence – even if a correct action – could lead to a non-compliance.  One thing I strive for in my training is not to simply tell trainees what to do but to show them how it is done, and more importantly, to have them perform the actions themselves.  Identifying hazardous materials by their proper shipping name in the hazardous materials table, determining the proper packaging including what – if any – packaging exception is available, applying the four hazard communication methods (labels, marks, shipping papers, and placards)…it all must be done in the proper sequence.

When the Marine Pollutant Mark is not Required

The purpose of this article is not to identify and explain a marine pollutant as regulated by the Hazardous Material Regulations of the PHMSA/USDOT; you can read all about that here:  What is a Marine Pollutant?  But, a brief summary will help; a marine pollutant is…

  • Defined at 49 CFR 171.8.
  • Listed by name in appendix B to the Hazardous Materials Table at §172.101.
  • If in a mixture or solution of one or more substances is at or above the following threshold concentrations:
    • 10% by weight for a regular marine pollutant
    • 1% by weight for a severe marine pollutant (identified with “PP”).

And…

  • Not excepted from regulation as a marine pollutant at §171.4(c).

The purpose of this article is also not to identify and explain all of the situations where the marine pollutant marking is not required on a packaging containing a regulated marine pollutant.  Those can be found at §172.322(d) and will have to wait to a later article.

Note:  To be quite frank, I find the exceptions from the marine pollutant mark detailed at §172.322(d)(1) and (2) to be contradictory and confusing.

The purpose of this article is to identify and explain just one of the four situations – found at §172.322(d)(3) – where the marine pollutant mark is not required on a bulk packaging, freight container or transport vehicle that already bears a HazMat label or placard.

(more…)

Q&A: Using the Marine Pollutant Marking by Land and Water

Here’s a question someone posted to Hazmat101, a Yahoogroup on December 1, 2015:

To  compare notes.

  1. Are marine pollutant placards required on a truck that contains non-bulk packages on its way to the port per 49 CFR? What if the truck has placards for Flammable packages?
  2. Are marine pollutant placards required on a freight  container with non-bulk packages shipped by water from the continental  U.S. to Hawaii  under 49 CFR (not the IMDG code)? What if the freight containers has placards for Flammable packages?
  3. Are marine pollutant placards required on a freight  container with non-bulk packages shipped by water under  the IMDG code? What if the freight container has placards for Flammable packages?

Citations appreciated.

Thanks in advance.

My reply that day (I must have been in the office!):
  • Just a point of clarification, the Marine Pollutant marking is not a label nor a placard even if it is the size of one or the other.  It is a marking (49 CFR 172.322).
  • Marine Pollutant MarkingThe marine pollutant marking is not required on a vehicle that is transporting non-bulk packagings by highway since per 49 CFR 171.4 the hazardous material regulations do not apply to a Marine Pollutant transported by highway (or rail or air) in a non-bulk packaging.  It might be OK to display the Marine Pollutant marking on the vehicle even if it is not required, but I am not certain.  The presence of the Flammable Liquid placard does not impact display of the Marine Pollutant marking.
  • A non-bulk packaging of a Marine Pollutant shipped by vessel is subject to the hazardous material regulations and therefore the non-bulk packaging and the freight container must bear the Marine Pollutant marking.  Marine Pollutant marking is not required on some non-bulk packagings of less than or equal to 5 L or 5 Kg (172.322(d)), however, a freight container of non-bulk packagings that do not have the Marine Pollutant marking due to 49 CFR 172.322(d) will still need to be marked with a placard-sized Marine Pollutant marking on all four sides (172.322(c)).The presence of the Flammable Liquid placard does Marine Pollutant Marking and Class 3 Placardnot impact display of the Marine Pollutant marking.
  • IMDG code requirements are the same as USDOT/PHMSA.  Non-bulk packaging of 5 liters or less or 5 Kg or less need not display the Marine Pollutant marking (5.2.1.6).  However, the freight container they are packed in must display the Marine Pollutant marking (5.3.2.3).  The presence of the Flammable Liquid placard does not impact display of the Marine Pollutant marking.
I hope this helps.  Please don’t hesitate to contact me with any other questions.
Daniel Stoehr
Daniels Training Services

Interested in a Webinar that covers this topic, and more!

My Webinar Training Schedule

Cargo tank truck with Class 9 placards and the Marine Pollutant markingAnd a post from someone else in the group that same day as well:
PC:
-The 49CFR never calls it a placard but in 49CFR 172.322(c) it talks about a truck being labeled with the marine pollutant mark.-49CFR 171.4 As long as you are on the road and not the water marine pollutants in non-bulk packaging don’t have to follow the rules for marine pollutants.-49CFR 172.322 has rules for Marine Pollutants.

Contact me with any questions you may have about the transportation of hazardous materials by air, highway, vessel, or rail

International and Domestic

Daniels Training Services

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/