A Large Quantity Generator of hazardous waste (LQG) and a Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility for hazardous waste (TSDF) are both subject to the USEPA regulations at 40 CFR 265, Subpart D and are required to have a contingency plan

This article is the third in a series to address the requirements of 40 CFR 265, Subpart D – Contingency Plan and Emergency Procedures as it applies to a large quantity generator of hazardous waste (LQG).  Each article will explain the requirements

An update to this web-based tool provides increased functionality The I-WASTE Tool was developed by USEPA's Homeland Security Research Program to assist responsible parties with clean-up in the aftermath of a terrorist attack, natural disaster, or chemical, biological, or radiological

BOSTON - The Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection (MassDEP) has assessed a $6,440 penalty against Radant Technologies, Inc. of Stow for violations of state Hazardous Waste regulations. The company manufactures composite radomes and reflectors at its 255 Hudson Road facility.

BOSTON — A waste hauling firm based in Essex will pay more than $93,000 to settle claims that it illegally dumped multiple loads of construction and demolition waste at an unpermitted site in Methuen, Attorney General Martha Coakley announced today. According

By this Order I find Heritage-Crystal Clean, LLC committed two (2) violations of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR), 49 C.F.R. Parts 171-180. Accordingly, I assess Respondent a $4,680 civil penalty for the violations. I. Summary Respondent: Heritage-Crystal Clean, LLC 950

By this Order, I find that D & M Propane (Respondent) committed two (2) violations of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR), 49 CFR Parts 171-180, and I assess Respondent a $6,000 civil penalty. On July 29, 2013, the Office of

By this Order, I find that Hennepin County Medical Center (Respondent) committed four (4) violations of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR), 49 CFR Parts 171-180, and I assess Respondent a $8,795 civil penalty. On September 10,2013, the Office of Chief

By this Order, I find that Flow Chem Technologies, LLC (Respondent) committed five (5) violations of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR), 49 CFR Parts 171-180, and I assess Respondent a $7,775 civil penalty. On July 16, 2013, the Office of

By this Order, I find that Interstate Chemical Company, Inc. (Respondent) committed one (1) violation of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR), 49 CFR Parts 171-180, and I assess Respondent a $2,531 civil penalty. On September 3, 2013, the Office of Chief Counsel