US EPA

Significant Hazardous Waste Penalties and Fines for Another Company

PHILADELPHIA (March 8, 2012) — Ellwood Quality Steels Company has agreed to pay a $150,000 penalty to settle alleged violations of hazardous waste regulations at its manufacturing facility in New Castle, Pa., the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced today.”  Based on the information contained in the full US EPA news release, let’s determine the cost for Ellwood Quality Steels Company to comply with the regulations and avoid this fine.

 

  1. 1.       “…a variety of hazardous waste including electric and ladle arc furnace dust, which was contained in two tractor trailers without being marked as hazardous waste;” – Since no mention is made to the contrary, I’ll assume the two tractor trailers meet the US EPA definition of a container found at 40 CFR 260.10Container means any portable device in which a material is stored, transported, treated, disposed of, or otherwise handled.  A roll of 500 labels bearing the words “Hazardous Waste” = $65.  Add the date of accumulation, ie. the date hazardous waste first was placed in the container, and your back in compliance.
  2. 2.       “…improperly disposing of mercury-containing universal waste lamps in its arc furnace without a hazardous waste permit.” – Cost for disposing of 500 x 4’ fluorescent lamps with Lamptracker = $450.
  3. 3.       “… stored hazardous waste for more than 90 days without a storage permit;” – This one’s a wash since it doesn’t cost anything extra to ship hazardous waste off-site prior to 90 days.  There are some instances when a Large Quantity Generator of hazardous waste may legally exceed the 90 day on-site accumulation limit without a permit, read more about it here.  Compliance with the regulations, in this case however, is free.
  4. 4.       “failed to keep hazardous waste containers closed;”  – Hazardous waste containers must be kept closed except when adding or removing waste, read more hereNew Pig Latching Drum Lid = $275.
  5. 5.       “failed to minimize the possibility of releases of hazardous wastes;” – I’m unsure what is meant by this, but since Pennsylvania is one of the few States that requires a containment system for the storage area of a hazardous waste generator [the others are: AL, CA, CT, MA, MN, SC (if LQG), WA, & MO (if >1,000 kg)], I’ll assume they didn’t provide proper containment.  I’m no contractor, so let’s assume the total cost to construct a storage area with containment = $25,000.
  6. 6.       “failed to conduct weekly inspections;” – Large and Small Quantity Generators of hazardous waste must weekly inspect their hazardous waste accumulation and storage areas, read more here.  The inspections can be completed by any employee trained sufficiently to perform their duties in compliance with the regulations.  Cost in lost time spent performing the inspection = $50/week = $2,600/year.
  7. 7.       “failed to provide hazardous waste training;” – I provide on-site training that meets the requirements of the US EPA for Hazardous Waste Personnel and the US DOT for HazMat Employees for $1,749.
  8. 8.       “failed to prepare and maintain hazardous training records;” – I provide these records as part of my on-site training; cost = $0.
  9. 9.       “failed to properly fill out hazardous waste manifests;” – I address the proper completion of the Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest at my on-site training and at my open-enrollment training at no additional cost.
  10. 10.   “and failed to comply with universal waste labeling/marking requirements.” – Though provided relief from full regulation under RCRA, universal waste still has specific labeling and marking requirements.  Learn how to comply with the regulations at one of my training events.  Purchase 100 universal waste labels from Labelmaster for $44.

Total cost to comply with regulations = $27,583 + $2,600/year for inspections.  Consider that the cost of the fines doesn’t begin to cover the total costs to the company in lost time, headaches, lawyer and consultant fees, etc.  No matter what math you use, it’s always less expensive to comply with the regulations than it is to pay the fines.

Please contact me for a free consultation; I can help you decide if you’d be better attending one of my open enrollment training events or having me conduct on-site training at your facility.

D002 Corrosive Hazardous Waste Determination

The characteristic of corrosivity is one step of the hazardous waste determination process that you must complete for every waste stream that you generate.

Your waste is a corrosive hazardous waste, with waste code D002, if a representative sample has either of two properties:

  1. It is aqueous and has a pH less than or equal to 2 or greater than or equal to 12.5, or
  2. It is a liquid and corrodes steel of a specified grade at a specified rate.

For the first property determination aqueous means, “Of or containing water, typically as a solvent or medium”.  The regulation doesn’t specify how much water must be present in the sample, however the only approved test method (Method 9040C) requires the sample to contain at least 20% water.   If your waste does not meet this requirement, then you cannot use this method for determination of corrosivity and must proceed to the second property determination.

The second property determination is one much less known by the regulated industry.  It must be used to determine corrosivity in two circumstances:

  1. The waste contains <20% water and therefore is not suitable for the first determination.
  2. The waste passes the first determination with a pH of >2 or < 12.5.

40 CFR 261.22(a)(2) specifies Method 1110A for determining if a liquid sample is able to corrode  steel (SAE 1020) at a rate greater than 6.35 mm (0.250 inch) per year at a test temperature of 55 °C (130 °F).  The key word here is:  liquid.  If you don’t have a liquid waste, then you may not use this test method to determine corrosivity.

If it is not clear from the above, the US EPA does not recognize a solid material as having the characteristic of corrosivity; a D002 waste code may not be applied to a solid.  This may differ for your state however as some have included solids in the characteristic of corrosivity or have revised the test methods to encompass solids.

The US EPA description of the characteristic of corrosivity  is explained at 40 CFR 261.22.  A careful reading of this regulation is necessary to ensure your hazardous waste determination is accurate and complete.  Good training will help illuminate other areas of the regulations and how they impact your operations.

The Hazardous Waste Determination for Spent Organic Solvents as an F-Listed Hazardous Waste

The US EPA has identified two different categories of hazardous waste:  characteristic and listed.  Characteristic hazardous waste must exhibit specific characteristic as defined at 40 CFR 261, Subpart C.  Usually lab analysis by a US EPA-approved test method plays an important part in characteristic hazardous waste determination, though not necessarily the only part.  Characteristic hazardous waste includes the following:

A listed hazardous waste must meet the defined use or status as listed at 40 CFR 261, Subpart D.  Analysis usually plays a minor role in determining if a waste is listed; safety data sheets (SDS) and generator knowledge are much more important in making this determination.  Listed wastes include the following:

  • F-listed waste from non-specific sources of a manufacturing process –waste codes F001 to F039.
  • K-listed waste from specific sources of a manufacturing process – waste codes K001 to K181.
  • P & U-listed waste from discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill clean-up materials – waste codes P001 to P205 and U001 to U411.

The F-listed hazardous wastes can be further broken down into the following groups:

  • Spent solvent wastes (F001 – F005).
  • Wastes from electroplating and other metal finishing operations (F006 – F012, F019).
  • Dioxin-bearing wastes (F020 – F023 and F026 – F028).
  • Wastes from the production of certain chlorinated aliphatic hydrocarbons (F024, F025).
  • Wastes from wood preserving (F032, F034, and F035).
  • Petroleum refinery wastewater treatment sludges (F037 and F038).
  • Multi-source leachate (F039).

Like this article?

Subscribe to my Monthly Newsletter

No marketing emails!

Spent solvent wastes are the most commonly generated listed hazardous wastes because of their frequent use in manufacturing processes such as painting, degreasing, and cleaning.  Just because you utilize a process similar to these or use a solvent in some other way, does not necessarily mean you must apply an F-code, instead the correct application of an F-code depends on how the solvent is used, the percentage of its constituents before use, and – for F003 only – whether or not the characteristic of Ignitability is present.

Keep in mind that more than one waste code (listed and characteristic) may apply to any waste.  A D001 for Ignitability is common in many solvents.  Depending on how it was used, a solvent may contain metals above the regulatory threshold and require a D-code for Toxicity.

Also, as I’ll note later, some of these determinations can be very tricky and the states have taken slightly different interpretations than the US EPA; be sure to check with your state environmental agency to assist you in your waste determination.

The first criteria in your waste determination is if the solvent in question is listed.  The list of thirty solvents (40 CFR 261.31) includes many common ones such as:  xylene, toluene, acetone, methylene chloride (aka: dichloromethane), and many others.  It doesn’t include common solvents such as:  mineral spirits or Stoddard solvent.  If its technical name does not appear on the list, than that F-code would not apply, though other waste codes may.

The F-listed solvents are:

Hazardous Waste CodeHazardous Waste
(Solvent Name)
Hazard Code
F001Tetrachloroethylene(T)
Trichloroethylene(T)
Methylene chloride(T)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane(T)
Carbon tetrachloride(T)
Chlorinated fluorocarbons(T)
F002Tetrachloroethylene(T)
Methylene chloride(T)
Trichloroethylene(T)
1,1,1-Trichloroethane(T)
Chlorobenzene(T)
1,1,2-Trichloro-1,2,2-trifluoroethane(T)
Ortho-dichlorobenzene(T)
Trichlorofluoromethane(T)
1,1,2-Trichloroethane(T)
F003Xylene(T)
Acetone(T)
Ethyl acetate(T)
Ethyl benzene(T)
Ethyl ether(T)
Methyl isobutyl ketone(T)
n-butyl alcohol(T)
Cyclohexanone(T)
Methanol(T)
F004Cresols & cresylic acid(T)
Nitrobenzene(T)
F005Toluene(T)
Methyl ethyl ketone(T)
Carbon disulfide(T)
Isobutanol(T)
Pyridine(T)
Benzene(T)
2-Ethoxyethanol(T)
2-Nitropropane(T)

Interested in site specific training at your site that covers this topic, and more!

Ask me about my Onsite Training

Second, the waste must have been used as a solvent for its solvent properties, that is, to solubilize (dissolve) or mobilize other constituents.  This includes:  degreasing, cleaning, fabric scouring, extractions, reactions, and synthesis media.  “Used as a solvent” does not include solvents used as ingredients in the formulation of a product.  The best example of this is a solvent used to thin paint; solvent used in this manner, even if listed and spent, would not be an F-listed hazardous waste.

Next, the solvent must be spent.  If it is virgin material, than an F-code would not apply, however it may have the characteristic of Ignitability (D001) and/or may be a U-listed waste (eg. acetone – U002, Benzene – U019, Toluene – U220).  A solvent is considered “spent” when it has been used and is no longer fit for use without being regenerated, reclaimed, or otherwise reprocessed (see 50 FR 53316, 12/31/85).

If being reclaimed by distillation or some other method, the solvent would not be spent and the F-code would not apply.  A material may be treated and reused in this manner until such time it is no longer useful to you and is therefore spent.  Note however, that the byproducts of the distillation process (still bottoms, pancakes, pugs, solids) are a listed hazardous waste if the above criteria are met.

A spent solvent that appears on the F-list still must meet some specific criteria before you can determine which waste code(s) – if any – will apply.

Contact me with any questions you may have about the generation, identification, management, and disposal of hazardous waste

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

F001, F002, F004, & F005:

First, note the absence of F003, more on it later.  If a spent solvent mixture contains 10% or more of any one solvent listed in F001, F002, F004, & F005 or a combination of any of them at an aggregate of 10% or more, than all appropriate F-codes would apply.  The determination of the concentration must be made before use of the solvent, not once it has become spent and therefore requires the use of a MSDS.

F001:

The F001 waste code is only applied to a spent solvent “used in degreasing” which means a “large-scale industrial degreasing operation”.  The F001 waste code would not apply to a solvent used for some purpose other than degreasing.  Some – but not all – solvents are listed in both F001 & F002 (e.g. methylene chloride).  If listed in both you must determine which of the two waste codes to apply, you will not use both (RO 13469).

F003:

This one is really tricky.  There are two ways that a spent solvent may be F003 listed:

  1. The solvent mixture contains only an F003 listed solvent.  A technical grade concentration with small impurities is acceptable as well (RO 13675).  Or…
  2. The solvent mixture contains any F003 listed solvent at any concentration and any combination of other F-listed solvents (F001, F002, F004, F005) at a concentration of 10% or greater.

A final requirement for the application of the F003 waste code hinges on the spent solvent’s characteristic of Ignitability at the point of generation.  The F003 waste code is listed solely because of its characteristic of Ignitability, thus the ‘I’ in the “Hazard Code” column of the F-list table in 40 CFR 261.31.  What this means is that even if one of the two above criteria are met but the spent solvent does not have a flash point of <60 °C (140 ˚F) – and is therefore not a D001 ignitable hazardous waste – then the F003 waste code would not apply.  In other words, no D001…no F003.  Read: What are ICR-Only Listed Hazardous Waste?

Where the application of the F003 code gets even trickier is if you throw F003 solvent contaminated shop towels into the argument.  This will have to be a topic for a later article.  Also problematic is the determination of the flash point of the solvent at the point of generation.  In some cases, a waste may be an ignitable D001 hazardous waste at the point of generation but later lose this characteristic.  In that case, the D001 waste code may no longer apply but the land disposal restrictions of 40 CFR 268 might.  Also, some states don’t accept the whole, “the D001 used to apply, but now it doesn’t”.  Be sure to check with your state environmental agency to see how their interpretation of these regulations applies to your operations.

If you like this article, please share it using any of the social media platforms identified at the bottom of this article.

You’ll look real smart recommending my articles!

The above is only one small part of the hazardous waste determination process, which is something you must do and document for every waste you generate.  The determination is only the first step in determining your hazardous waste generator status and then the applicable requirements.  Contact me if you have any questions about F-Listed solvents, hazardous waste, the hazardous waste determination or any of the USEPA (and state) regulations for the cradle-to-grave management of hazardous waste.

Working Relationship Between OSHA & EPA

Some companies, some industries, some locations just seem to be of greater interest to  one or more of the regulatory agencies:  the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) of the US Department of Labor, the Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA), or the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) of the US Department of Transportation.  It may be that one of these agencies is a common visitor to your property, but others you see less frequent or not at all.  While being inspected by one agency – let’s say OSHA – you may think you need not worry about compliance with the hazardous waste regulations enforced by the US EPA;  this is not so.  In this US EPA press release, the owner of a New Hampshire foundry faces criminal charges for the storage of hazardous waste for greater than 90 days without a permit.  There is nothing significant about the violation or the charge, what is significant is the fact that the chain of events was started when the violation was noted during OSHA inspections in April and August of 2009.  This is no accident, since 1991 the US EPA and OSHA have assisted each other in identifying and reporting potential violations of their respective regulations under a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU).

The purpose of the MOU is to establish and improve the working relationship between the US EPA & OSHA in order to improve their ability to detect potential violations and enforce their respective regulations.  The agencies agree to the fullest possible coordination between them at all levels which includes “referrals of alleged violations, and related matters concerning compliance and law enforcement…”  To do this US EPA and OSHA will exchange names and phone numbers of appropriate offices and personnel and keep such information up to date.  They will also conduct periodic training programs for each other’s personnel on the requirements of their respective regulations.  In short, US EPA will train OSHA personnel on what potential environmental violations they should look for when inspecting your company.  OSHA will do the same for US EPA personnel.

Under the MOU, an OSHA inspector must inform the US EPA if a potential environmental violation comes to their attention.  In turn, the US EPA must respond to such referrals:  “EPA shall respond to referrals from OSHA, and OSHA shall respond to referrals from EPA…” The agencies will have periodic meetings to track the progress of actions taken on these referrals.  You can expect US EPA to follow-up if OSHA informs them of a potential violation.

The MOU goes on to indicate that US EPA and OSHA may conduct joint inspections or separate.  If an alleged violation is found during a separate inspection, a referral shall be made.  Inspections may be part of an annual workplan developed by the agencies or ad hoc following an accident, injury, or reported violation.

No one wants a regulatory violation found during an inspection.  Even less do we want an unsafe or unwise situation to result in someone getting hurt or damaging the environment.  Better to know the regulations, comply with them, and keep everyone safe and the grass green.  My open enrollment training events will help you to do just that.  If you prefer, I can come to your site and train all of your employees in one day for a flat fee of $1,749.  Please contact me to discuss your training options further.

What is the US EPA Program WasteWise?

(Boston, Mass. – Dec. 14, 2011) – Three WasteWise partners in New England were recognized by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for outstanding achievements as 2011 WasteWise award winners. Nationally, there were 29 winners, with awards in categories including business, government, and educational sectors.  You can read the full news release here, but I think I’d be remiss if I didn’t send a shout-out to those three New England companies:

  • Raytheon Company, Mass.
  • Cannon Grange #152 Inc., Conn.
  • Genzyme Corporation (Mass.)

So just what exactly is WasteWise?  You can learn much more about it from its website, or check out this factsheet, but WasteWise – founded in 1994 and with more than 2,700 members – is a US EPA program that encourages a variety of different organizations and businesses to voluntarily commit to waste reduction and recycling goals.  By becoming a member of WasteWise, you obtain access to a variety of tools to help you reach those waste goals and to promote your efforts to your customers, your community, and the world.

Organizations may join WasteWise as either a Partner or an Endorser.  A Partner commits to reduce their own waste production whereas an Endorser is a branch of government or other organization that uses the tools available through WasteWise to convince its members of the benefits of waste reduction and recycling.  Eligible members include but are not limited to all sizes of:  US businesses, State & local governments, non-profit organizations, and trade associations.

As a member, you have access to all of the following:

It’s the third bullet point of the above that you see on display at the top of this article, and on the US EPA website of the 2011 WasteWise Award Winners.  As a member, you have the opportunity to promote your company – and be promoted – as a company that cares about the environment and is doing something about it; this alone might be reason enough to join up.  An additional incentive is having access to the WasteWise Re-TRAC System.  This new data management and reporting system allows you to collect, organize, analyze, and report your waste reduction activities and to generate reports such as the WasteWise Climate Profile report.

If you are considering becoming a member, but don’t know if WasteWise has the resources to assist your specific interests, check out their Targeted Initiatives and see if there is a Challenge or Campaign that directly addresses your waste generation.  And why not involve the office personnel as well?  WasteWise has a tool for determining the carbon footprint of office operations including:  company-owned vehicle transportation; purchased electricity; waste disposal; and leased assets, franchises, and outsourced activities.

Take a look at the information available, determine if WasteWise is a good fit for your operations, and then take it to management and see what they think.  Let me know how it works for you, I’ve never been able to convince a company to voluntarily commit to any US EPA program.  Perhaps you’ll have better luck.

USEPA Regulations for the Management of Medical Waste

USEPA Regulations for the Management of Medical Waste:

It was the summer between my freshman and sophomore years of college at the University of Wisconsin – Stevens Point when news broke in July of 1988 about needles and other medical waste washing up on public beaches on the eastern seaboard.  The national media performed admirably as a source of un-sensationalized and thoughtful information about this public health calamity (Note: irony).  By 1991 it became clear that the panic was overblown, as it was later reported that “At the end of the summer, the medical-type waste found on Long Island’s beaches would have barely filled a picnic basket.”Sharps Container

That didn’t stop the U.S. Congress from enacting the Medical Waste Tracking Act (MWTA) of 1988 to amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act (SWDA).  The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) regulations for the act went into effect on June 24, 1989 and expired on June 21, 1991.  In that time they were effective in four states only: New York, New Jersey, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and Puerto Rico.  There were several purposes for this two year program:

  • Gather information related to medical waste management.
  • Focus attention on the medical waste issue.
  • Examine various treatment technologies for medical waste.
  • Provide a model for states and other federal agencies to develop their own medical waste programs.

USEPA concluded from the MWTA that the disease-causing potential of medical waste decreases naturally from its point of generation as it moves toward its final destination.  USEPA has not renewed the MWTA and has left regulation to the individual states or to other federal agencies.

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

State Regulations for the Management of Medical Waste:

Most states have since further developed their own programs resulting in each state program differing significantly from each other.  One key difference between state regulations and the Federal MWTA is their application to industrial and commercial facilities and not just to medical facilities and hospitals.  Therefore, any medical waste generated at an industrial or commercial facility – even if generated by employees and not part of the business – cannot go to landfill, but must meet strict state requirements for on-site handling and off-site disposal.

Another difference is how the waste is named.  While identified as “Medical Waste” by the Federal act and regulations, it may go by several different names under state regulations:

Check with your state to determine your responsibility for management of Medical Waste

Like this article?

Subscribe to my Monthly Newsletter

No marketing emails!

Other Federal Agencies Management of Medical Waste:

The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration within the U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT/PHMSA) regulates the transportation of medical waste as a Division 6.2 Infectious Substance.  The definition of an infectious substance at 49 CFR 173.134(a)(6) reads:

Sharps means any object contaminated with a pathogen or that may become contaminated with a pathogen through handling or during transportation and also capable of cutting or penetrating skin or a packaging material. Sharps includes needles, syringes, scalpels, broken glass, culture slides, culture dishes, broken capillary tubes, broken rigid plastic, and exposed ends of dental wires.”

Regardless of Federal and state regulations, USDOT/PHMSA Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR) will apply to the off-site transportation of a medical waste as a Division 6.2 Infectious Substance.

The Occupational Safety and Health Administration’s (OSHA) Bloodborne Pathogen Standard can be found at 29 CFR 1910.1030.  While aimed primarily at healthcare workers and others who deal with blood and body fluids on a regular basis, it also covers maintenance, custodial, laundry, and waste handlers that may be called upon to clean up body fluids after an accident.  OSHA website.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) has guidance for persons working with infectious pathogens.  CDC website.

State regulations, whether for Medical Waste, Hazardous Waste, Universal Waste, Non-Hazardous Waste, or Used Oil present an additional level of regulations for any industrial, commercial, or government facility.  Please contact me with any questions you may have about the management of waste under Federal or State regulations.

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/