lab pack

Q&A: Does the new identification number package mark height requirement apply to hazardous waste lab packs?

A question from the regulated community (01.26.17):

Hello,
Do the new labeling requirements impact lab packs?
Are they considered ‘non-bulk’ and thus must conform to the new UN size?
Thanks,Hazardous waste lab pack drums

My reply, buying time:

That’s a good question! Let me research and get back to you.

Final answer that same day:

I believe I have an answer to your question.  I assume it is related to the new size requirement for the identification number on a non-bulk packaging.  Please see below:

  • The new size requirement for the identification number applies to the marking on a non-bulk packaging.
  • Though possible, it is unlikely that a lab pack for hazardous waste will be shipped in anything other than a non-bulk packaging.
  • There is no exception to the new size requirement for lab packs that I can find in 49 CFR 173.12.
Therefore, if a lab pack of hazardous waste meets the definition of a hazardous material (the hazardous waste from a CESQG does not) then it must be shipped according to the regulations of the USDOT.  Since January 1, 2017, those regulations have mandated the minimum height of the identification number marking (just the identification number, nothing else) on a non-bulk packaging.
I hope this helps.
Please don’t hesitate to contact me with any other questions.

Q&A: Lab Packs and Satellite Accumulation Areas for Hazardous Waste

(12.12.16) From a customer who had just completed one of my RCRA Training Webinars:

Hi Daniel,

Thanks for the training today. I am working on completing the evaluation and will get that to you soon.

I have a couple of follow up questions. We are an SQG (Small Quantity Generator of hazardous waste).

Not sure of your hazardous waste generator status?

Take this short survey

  • Outdoor storage of hazardous waste containersIf you have a Lab-Pack with F and U codes, could you send those offsite in the same drum if they are going to be treated the same?
  • Do you have any guidance on how frequently Lab-Packs should be sent out?
  • Do you have any additional guidance on satellite accumulation and having it be in line of site? We have some satellite accumulation in the lab’s walk in closet in a flammable cabinet rather than out in the general work space. It is generated in the lab.

Thank you.

Contact me with any questions you may have about the generation, identification, management, and disposal of hazardous waste

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

My reply that same day:

Thank you for contacting me. Please see below:

  • EPA regulations do not address the off-site transportation of hazardous waste other than to reference USDOT regulations.  Editor’s note:  This isn’t entirely correct as the USEPA does have pre-transportation requirements for the off-site transportation of hazardous waste (read: USEPA Requirements for off-site Transportation of Hazardous Waste Containers and read how the regulations for marking hazardous waste containers have changed under the new Generator Improvements Rule.  And, of course, USEPA regulations apply to a hazardous waste from ‘cradle-to-grave’ which includes its transportation.
  • USDOT regulations at 49 CFR 173.12(b)(2)(i) regarding the shipment of hazardous waste lab packs reads in part: “Each outer packaging may contain only one class of waste material.” So, the waste codes don’t matter. Nor does the ultimate treatment method. What matters is the USDOT hazard class of the hazard waste. It is quite possible that both an F-code and U-code hazardous waste are in the same USDOT hazard class, i.e. both are Class 3 Flammable Liquids and can therefore be packaged in the same container.  Other requirements for 49 CFR 173.12(b) must be met for the shipment of hazardous waste lab packs.
  • I am not aware of any guidance on how frequently lab packs must be sent off-site for disposal. However, as an SQG you must not accumulate hazardous waste on-site beyond 180 days or 270 days if the TSDF you must use is >200 miles away. 30 day extensions are available in extreme circumstances. Also, you must not accumulate >6,000 kg of hazardous waste on-site at one time.
  • ‘Line of sight’ is only one way to comply with the second of two requirements for a satellite accumulation container. The goal is to have the container ‘under the control of the operator’. Two acceptable methods to accomplish this are: 1. ‘Line of sight’ & 2. Container is secured in some manner where access is limited to operator(s). This second method could be accomplished by keeping it in a secure cabinet in a work area that is restricted to those who generate the waste, e.g. lab personnel. Based on your description, it sounds like your satellite accumulation container is ‘under the control of the operator’.

I hope this helps.

Please don’t hesitate to contact me with any other questions.

And that was it!

Whether you need training, a consultation, or just have a question about the management of waste or the transportation of hazardous materials, please don’t hesitate to contact me.

Exception to the Segregation Restrictions of 49 CFR 177.848 for Lab Packs of Hazardous Waste

49 CFR 173.12 contains many exceptions to full regulation for shipments of hazardous waste in a lab pack.  In an earlier blog post I discussed the exception in 173.12(d)that removes the need to include the technical name of a hazardous material when shipping lab packs of hazardous waste with a generic shipping name such as:  Waste Flammable Liquid, n.o.s.  This article will focus on the relief from the requirements to segregate HazMat -including hazardous waste – in transportation, found in 173.12(e).

If the requirements of this section are met – more on that below – then lab packs of hazardous waste are not subject to the segregation requirements of…

  • 49 CFR 174.81(d) for shipments by rail,
  • 49 CFR 176.83(b) for shipments by vessel, or;
  • 49 CFR 177.848(d) for shipments by highway,

The purpose of the segregation restrictions is to prevent the transportation, or storage in transportation, of hazardous materials that may be incompatible and thus pose an unreasonable risk to life, property, or the environment.  However, PHMSA has determined that if packaged properly, the small volumes of hazardous waste in a lab pack can be transported safely without these restrictions.

Note that this exception to the segregation requirements does not apply to shipments by air.  In that case, the requirements of the International Air Transport Association (IATA) must be complied with in addition to and separate from the regulations of the PHMSA/US DOT.

To be subject to the exception, the hazardous waste must be packaged as a lab pack.  The PHMSA doesn’t define a lab pack, instead it refers you to the Appendix C Glossary of the RCRA Compliance Manual 2011 which defines a lab pack as “Drums filled with many small containers packed in non-biodegradable absorbent materials.”   This type of packaging is most commonly used when a hazardous waste generator – not necessarily a “lab” – has many small containers of hazardous waste for disposal.

To use the exception, the lab pack must meet the requirements of 49 CFR 173.12(b) which first specifically identifies the hazardous wastes that may not take advantage of this exception or any other found in this section, they are:

  1. A material poisonous-by-inhalation
  2. A Division 6.1, Packing Group I material
  3. Chloric Acid
  4. Oleum (fuming sulfuric acid)

173.12(b) goes on to identify the Class and Division of lab packed hazardous waste that are authorized to use this exception as long as they are packaged in combination packagings as required by this section (see below) and are shipped for disposal by highway, rail, or cargo vessel; they are:

  • Class 3 Flammable or Combustible Liquid
  • Division 4.1 Flammable Solid
  • Division 4.2 Spontaneously Combustible
  • Division 4.3 Dangerous When Wet
  • Division 5.1 Oxidizer
  • Division 5.2 Organic Peroxide
  • Division 6.1 Poison
  • Class 8 Corrosive
  • Class 9 Miscellaneous

What are the combination packaging requirements of this section that must be used if the hazardous waste lab packs are to utilize the exception?  Well, briefly…

The inner packaging must either be glass of ≤4 L (1 gal) rated capacity or metal or plastic of ≤20 L (5.3 gal) rated capacity.  Inner packagings of liquids must be surrounded by a chemically compatible absorbent material sufficient to absorb the liquid contents.

The outer packaging may contain only one Class of waste material, may not contain incompatibles (ie. acid and base, some organic and inorganic, etc.), and it must be a type of packaging listed in 49 CFR 173.12(b)(2)(ii).  Note that the US EPA land disposal restrictions at 40 CFR 268.42(c) limit the packaging/container you may use if the entire lab pack is going straight to landfill or incineration.  By and large a open-top steel drum of at least packing group III condition will be OK.  Also The gross weight of the combined packaging (inner & outer packaging, absorbents and contents) may not exceed 205 KG (452 lb).

So, before you prepare a lab pack of hazardous waste for off-site shipment, ask yourself, “Is it…

  • not a prohibited material?
  • an authorized Class or Division?
  • to be shipped by highway, rail, or cargo vessel?
  • packaged in compliance with combination packaging requirements of 49 CFR 173.12(b)(2)(ii)?

If you answered ‘yes’ to all of the above, then lab pack shipments of the hazardous waste are not subject to the transportation segregation restrictions if they also are blocked and braced so that they are separated from incompatible materials by at least 4 feet horizontally and maintained at least 4 inches off the floor of the vehicle.

I suggest you read 173.12(e) as necessary for a full description of additional requirements for shipments of the following incompatible materials.

  1. The vehicle may not contain Class 1 explosives, Class 7 radioactive, or uncontainerized hazardous waste.
  2. Waste cyanides and waste acids must be packaged as specified in 173.12(e)(2).
  3. Waste Division 4.2 Spontaneously Combustible and Class 8 Corrosive Liquids must be packaged as specified in 173.12(e)(3).
  4. Waste Division 6.1, PG I, Hazard Zone A Poison Inhalation Hazards and Class 3, Class 8 liquids, or Division 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 5.1, and 5.2 materials must be packaged as specified in 173.12(3)(4).
In the scope of a blog post like this, and with so many variable possible, I can only hope to outline the regulations and point you in the right direction to find the answer for yourself.  If you ship lab packs of hazardous waste, you should make you and your HazMat Employees very familiar with 49 CFR 173.12.

 

The Exception From use of the Technical Name for Lab Pack Shipments of Hazardous Waste

Sometimes when shipping hazardous materials the proper shipping name does not adequately describe the contents of the shipment.  An example of this, found in the Hazardous Materials Table (HMT) at 49 CFR 172.101 is the proper shipping name of:  Flammable Liquids, n.o.s. This entry and others like it contain the letter ‘G’ in column 1 of the HMT.  The ‘G’ stands for generic and indicates that one or more technical names must be included with the proper shipping name on the shipping paper and on the package.

An earlier article I wrote addressed the requirement to use the technical name when shipping HazMat, you may read it here.  In this article I will address one of the exceptions for the shipment of hazardous waste in lab packs found in49 CFR 173.12.  The exception provides relief from the requirement to use technical names when shipping lab packs of hazardous waste.

The PHMSA doesn’t define a lab pack, instead it refers you to the Appendix C Glossary of the RCRA Compliance Manual 2011 which defines a lab pack as “Drums filled with many small containers packed in non-biodegradable absorbent materials.”   This type of packaging is most commonly used when a hazardous waste generator – not necessarily a “lab” – has many small containers of hazardous waste for disposal.

49 CFR 173.12(b) first specifically identifies the hazardous wastes that may not take advantage of this exception or any other found in this section, they are:

  1. A material poisonous-by-inhalation
  2. A Division 6.1, Packing Group I material
  3. Chloric Acid
  4. Oleum (fuming sulfuric acid)

It goes on to identify the Class and Division of lab packed hazardous waste that are excepted as long as they are packaged in combination packagings as required by this section (see below) and are shipped for disposal by highway, rail, or cargo vessel, they are:

  • Class 3 Flammable or Combustible Liquid
  • Division 4.1 Flammable Solid
  • Division 4.2 Spontaneously Combustible
  • Division 4.3 Dangerous When Wet
  • Division 5.1 Oxidizer
  • Division 5.2 Organic Peroxide
  • Division 6.1 Poison
  • Class 8 Corrosive
  • Class 9 Miscellaneous

What are the combination packaging requirements of this section that must be used if the hazardous waste lab packs are to utilize the exception?  Well, briefly…

The inner packaging must either be glass of ≤4 L (1 gal) rated capacity or metal or plastic of ≤20 L (5.3 gal) rated capacity.  Inner packagings of liquids must be surrounded by a chemically compatible absorbent material sufficient to absorb the liquid contents.

The outer packaging may contain only one Class of waste material, may not contain incompatibles (ie. acid and base, some organic and inorganic, etc.), and it must be a type of packaging listed in 49 CFR 173.12(b)(2)(ii).  Note that the US EPA land disposal restrictions at 40 CFR 268.42(c) limit the packaging/container you may use if the entire lab pack is going straight to landfill or incineration.  Also The gross weight of the combined packaging (inner & outer packaging, absorbents and contents) may not exceed 205 KG (452 lb).

So, before you prepare a lab pack of hazardous waste for off-site shipment, ask yourself, “Is it…

  • not a prohibited material?
  • an authorized Class or Division?
  • to be shipped by highway, rail, or cargo vessel?
  • packaged in compliance with combination packaging requirements of 49 CFR 173.12(b)(2)(ii)?

If you answered yes to all of the above, then you may take advantage of the following exceptions:

  1. A generic description from the Hazardous Materials Table may be used in place of specific chemical names, when two or more chemically compatible waste materials in the same hazard class are packaged in the same outside packaging.  This means that a combination packaging containing several containers of sulfuric, nitric, and hydrochloric acid can utilize the proper shipping name of:  Waste Corrosive Liquids, n.o.s.  Read here for an explanation of when to use the word “waste” with a proper shipping name.
  2. You need not include the technical name(s) on the shipping paper or on the package even if there is a ‘G’ in column 1 of the HMT for that proper shipping name.

But, as Columbo used to say, “Just one more thing…”  If the hazardous waste is also a hazardous substance(defined at 49 CFR 171.8), then it must be described as required in 49 CFR 172.203(c).  Which means you need to make sure the name of the hazardous substance and the letters ‘RQ’ are included with the proper shipping name on the shipping paper and the package.

To learn more about shipping hazardous waste, hazardous substances, hazardous materials, and all the requirements of a HazMat Employee, attend one of my training events.  My training also covers the US EPA training requirements for generators of hazardous waste.  You can complete both of these training requirements in one day.

Contact me to schedule on-site training!

Review my open enrollment training schedule and register now!

Subscribe to my monthly newsletter to receive articles like this every month.  No marketing emails at all, I promise.