hazardous waste

Significant Hazardous Waste Penalties and Fines for Another Company

“PHILADELPHIA (March 8, 2012) — Ellwood Quality Steels Company has agreed to pay a $150,000 penalty to settle alleged violations of hazardous waste regulations at its manufacturing facility in New Castle, Pa., the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced today.”  Based on the information contained in the full US EPA news release, let’s determine the cost for Ellwood Quality Steels Company to comply with the regulations and avoid this fine.

 

  1. 1.       “…a variety of hazardous waste including electric and ladle arc furnace dust, which was contained in two tractor trailers without being marked as hazardous waste;” – Since no mention is made to the contrary, I’ll assume the two tractor trailers meet the US EPA definition of a container found at 40 CFR 260.10:  Container means any portable device in which a material is stored, transported, treated, disposed of, or otherwise handled.  A roll of 500 labels bearing the words “Hazardous Waste” = $65.  Add the date of accumulation, ie. the date hazardous waste first was placed in the container, and your back in compliance.
  2. 2.       “…improperly disposing of mercury-containing universal waste lamps in its arc furnace without a hazardous waste permit.” – Cost for disposing of 500 x 4’ fluorescent lamps with Lamptracker = $450.
  3. 3.       “… stored hazardous waste for more than 90 days without a storage permit;” – This one’s a wash since it doesn’t cost anything extra to ship hazardous waste off-site prior to 90 days.  There are some instances when a Large Quantity Generator of hazardous waste may legally exceed the 90 day on-site accumulation limit without a permit, read more about it here.  Compliance with the regulations, in this case however, is free.
  4. 4.       “failed to keep hazardous waste containers closed;”  – Hazardous waste containers must be kept closed except when adding or removing waste, read more here.  New Pig Latching Drum Lid = $275.
  5. 5.       “failed to minimize the possibility of releases of hazardous wastes;” – I’m unsure what is meant by this, but since Pennsylvania is one of the few States that requires a containment system for the storage area of a hazardous waste generator [the others are: AL, CA, CT, MA, MN, SC (if LQG), WA, & MO (if >1,000 kg)], I’ll assume they didn’t provide proper containment.  I’m no contractor, so let’s assume the total cost to construct a storage area with containment = $25,000.
  6. 6.       “failed to conduct weekly inspections;” – Large and Small Quantity Generators of hazardous waste must weekly inspect their hazardous waste accumulation and storage areas, read more here.  The inspections can be completed by any employee trained sufficiently to perform their duties in compliance with the regulations.  Cost in lost time spent performing the inspection = $50/week = $2,600/year.
  7. 7.       “failed to provide hazardous waste training;” – I provide on-site training that meets the requirements of the US EPA for Hazardous Waste Personnel and the US DOT for HazMat Employees for $1,749.
  8. 8.       “failed to prepare and maintain hazardous training records;” – I provide these records as part of my on-site training; cost = $0.
  9. 9.       “failed to properly fill out hazardous waste manifests;” – I address the proper completion of the Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest at my on-site training and at my open-enrollment training at no additional cost.
  10. 10.   “and failed to comply with universal waste labeling/marking requirements.” – Though provided relief from full regulation under RCRA, universal waste still has specific labeling and marking requirements.  Learn how to comply with the regulations at one of my training events.  Purchase 100 universal waste labels from Labelmaster for $44.

Total cost to comply with regulations = $27,583 + $2,600/year for inspections.  Consider that the cost of the fines doesn’t begin to cover the total costs to the company in lost time, headaches, lawyer and consultant fees, etc.  No matter what math you use, it’s always less expensive to comply with the regulations than it is to pay the fines.

Please contact me for a free consultation; I can help you decide if you’d be better attending one of my open enrollment training events or having me conduct on-site training at your facility.

Notification of Regulated Waste Activity Form for Hazardous Waste Generators

The US EPA requires you to submit a Notification of Regulated Waste Activity (8700-12) Form for certain activities involving wastes subject to the regulations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).  A Notification is required if you handle a regulated waste or hazardous secondary material and may be required under the following circumstances:

  • You are a Large Quantity Generator (LQG) or Small Quantity Generator (SQG) of hazardous waste.  A Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator of hazardous waste (CESQG) is not required to notify.
  • You are a Large Quantity Handler of universal waste (accumulate >5,000 Kg of universal waste).
  • You recycle hazardous waste.
  • You transport, process, or re-refine used oil; burn off-spec used oil for energy recovery; or market used oil.  The generation, storage, and off-site transportation of used oil is not subject to notification.
  • You are an eligible academic entity opting into 40 CFR 262, Subpart K.
  • You are managing a hazardous secondary material.

Upon receipt of an initial notification form, your site will be issued a unique EPA ID number by the US EPA.  This number is specific to the geographic location of your site and does not change if you sell the property or expire if you go out of business.

If you already have an EPA ID number, you must submit a subsequent notification for changes in any of the following:

The Notification of Regulated Waste Activity Form is the method the US EPA or your state environmental agency (see below) relies on to track your regulated waste activities.  It is your responsibility to ensure the information they have is up-to-date, accurate, and complete. The US EPA recently updated its Notification of Regulated Waste Activity Instructions and Form Booklet in December 2011 and it contains very helpful information.

Many states with authorized hazardous waste programs have their own procedures and requirements for submittal of the initial and subsequent notification forms.  State-specific regulations may include:

  • A state-specific notification form in lieu of the federal form.
  • Time lines for submittal of the initial and subsequent notifications.
  • If using the US EPA form, a state mailing address for submittal.
  • Fees to accompany the notification.

It is very important that you check with your state to ensure your submittal meets their requirements.  

My training services cover the hazardous waste regulations of the US EPA and the HazMat Employee regulations of the US DOT.  I provide open enrollment training events nationwide and year round (my schedule) and on-site training to meet your exact needs.  Please contact me to arrange for the exact training services you require.

When Does the Date of Accumulation Begin for Waste Submitted for Analysis?

It’s not too hard to imagine a situation where a container of an unknown material for disposal is brought to your attention during a facility clean-out.  In this situation, disposal as a waste is certain, what isn’t certain are the presence, and type, of hazards in the unknown waste.  If a sample is collected and submitted for analysis, how must you manage the unknown waste while you await results?

The answer is simple and answered directly in this US EPA interpretation (RO11424):  any unknown waste must be managed as a hazardous waste until such time as generator knowledge or analysis proves it is not a hazardous waste.

The moment a decision is made to discard a material, it becomes a waste.  This is its “Point of Generation (POG).  At the POG you are required per 40 CFR 262.11 to determine if the waste is exempt from regulation (40 CFR 261.4 or other), is a de-regulated hazardous waste (Used Oil, Universal Waste), or is a listed or characteristic hazardous waste.  Any delay in conducting the hazardous waste determination – say, waiting for lab results – does not exempt the waste from regulation.  The requirements for hazardous waste generators (labeling, on-site accumulation time limit, inspections, training, etc.) apply at the POG or when the waste is removed from a Satellite Accumulation Area (SAA)

Suggested handling for unknown waste during a hazardous waste determination:

  1. Store in your Central Accumulation Area (CAA) or SAA.
  2. Label:  “Hazardous Waste – Pending Analysis”  <<DATE OF ACCUMULATION>>.
  3. Manage the same as all other non-exempt (ie. CESQG) hazardous waste.
  4. Request the lab to “Rush” results.  Note, your lab may charge an additional fee for rush service.
  5. Immediately upon receipt of results, compare them to hazardous waste characteristics (40 CFR 261, Subpart C).  Determination of listed hazardous waste (40 CFR 261, Subpart D) does not require analysis as it relies upon your knowledge of the source of the waste.
  6. If waste is hazardous, remove “Pending Analysis” from the label and continue on-site management as hazardous waste.  Arrange for off-site disposal.
  7. If waste is non-hazardous, remove hazardous identification and manage as non-hazardous waste.

Read this blog post for more information about exceptions to the US EPA and US DOT regulations for the storage and transportation of waste determination samples.

Being a generator of hazardous waste is not easy.  Frequently what seems like common-sense (waiting for a lab report before handling a waste as hazardous) is actually a serious violation of the RCRA regulations.  Attendance at one of my open enrollment training events is a good way to ensure you are prepared for situations like these when the arise.

Cradle to Grave Under RCRA and CERCLA

RCRA – the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act – was passed in 1976 to amend the Solid Waste Disposal Act of 1965 and to address a growing national concern over the improper management and disposal of both hazardous and non-hazardous waste.  Subtitle C of RCRA established a system to manage by regulation a hazardous waste from its moment of generation through transportation to its treatment, storage, and finally, disposal.  The name for this comprehensive management system is:  Cradle to Grave.

  • Point of Generation = “Cradle”
  • Transportation to Treatment, Storage, or Disposal = “to”
  • Treatment, Storage, and Final Disposal = “Grave”

While RCRA regulates the generation, transportation, and disposal of hazardous waste, it also has the authority to clean up hazardous waste from active facilities.  RCRA does not, however, have the authority to address the problem of hazardous waste at inactive or abandoned sites or those resulting from emergency response to spills.  Enter CERCLA.

CERCLA – the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980 – aka:  Superfund, was created to address the problem of hazardous waste and hazardous substances at inactive or abandoned sites or those resulting from emergency response to spills.  It was amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act (SARA) of 1986.  Upon a site becoming subject to its regulations (ie. a Superfund Site), CERCLA imposes liability on parties responsible for, in whole or in part, the presence of hazardous substances at a site.  In other words, if you had anything to do with a hazardous substance ending up at a Superfund Site, either by transporting it their yourself or by contracting with others to do it for you, you have the potential to be identified as a Potentially Responsible Party (PRP) and be held responsible for the entire cost of cleaning up the site.  CERCLA’s authority in these matters is broad and has been upheld by the courts.

A generator of hazardous waste must know about CERCLA/SARA as well as RCRA because CERCLA has the authority to force a generator to clean-up a polluted site or scene of an emergency response spill if that generator ever sent any of its hazardous waste to that site.  But it goes further.  CERCLA regulates hazardous substances, not just hazardous waste.  The definition of a hazardous substance includes a hazardous waste, but it also includes 800 other hazardous substances listed in 40 CFR 302.4.  Many non-hazardous wastes, recycled materials, and de-regulated hazardous wastes (Universal Waste, Used Oil, etc.) contain hazardous substances, which includes:

  • Copper and Copper Compounds
  • Lead and Lead Compounds
  • Mercury and Mercury Compounds
  • Zinc and Zinc Compounds
  • And many more

So, every time you arrange for disposal of a hazardous waste by recycling, treatment, or disposal, you are opening up the potential for clean-up of a site under CERCLA or RCRA.  Every time you dispose of a non-hazardous or de-regulated hazardous waste – even scrap metal for recycling – you are opening up the potential for clean-up of a site under CERCLA if it contains a hazardous substance.  This responsibility exists even if your waste has been re-manifested by a third party prior to its disposal.  You can read more about the Superfund Program here.

What can you do?

  1. Accept that some risk is the cost of doing business.
  2. Do everything you can to eliminate the generation of waste.
  3. Ensure you are familiar with the regulations that apply to your operations and adhere to them.
  4. Perform “due diligence” of any facility to which you ship your waste for disposal, treatment, or recycling to ensure they are in compliance with the regulations and that they have measures in place to protect you from future liability such as a large cash reserve or sufficient insurance coverage.

At my training events I address all of the above while meeting the RCRA training requirements for Large and Small Quantity Generators of hazardous waste.  Contact me to discuss your training needs or review my training schedule to find a date and location near you.

D002 Corrosive Hazardous Waste Determination

The characteristic of corrosivity is one step of the hazardous waste determination process that you must complete for every waste stream that you generate.

Your waste is a corrosive hazardous waste, with waste code D002, if a representative sample has either of two properties:

  1. It is aqueous and has a pH less than or equal to 2 or greater than or equal to 12.5, or
  2. It is a liquid and corrodes steel of a specified grade at a specified rate.

For the first property determination aqueous means, “Of or containing water, typically as a solvent or medium”.  The regulation doesn’t specify how much water must be present in the sample, however the only approved test method (Method 9040C) requires the sample to contain at least 20% water.   If your waste does not meet this requirement, then you cannot use this method for determination of corrosivity and must proceed to the second property determination.

The second property determination is one much less known by the regulated industry.  It must be used to determine corrosivity in two circumstances:

  1. The waste contains <20% water and therefore is not suitable for the first determination.
  2. The waste passes the first determination with a pH of >2 or < 12.5.

40 CFR 261.22(a)(2) specifies Method 1110A for determining if a liquid sample is able to corrode  steel (SAE 1020) at a rate greater than 6.35 mm (0.250 inch) per year at a test temperature of 55 °C (130 °F).  The key word here is:  liquid.  If you don’t have a liquid waste, then you may not use this test method to determine corrosivity.

If it is not clear from the above, the US EPA does not recognize a solid material as having the characteristic of corrosivity; a D002 waste code may not be applied to a solid.  This may differ for your state however as some have included solids in the characteristic of corrosivity or have revised the test methods to encompass solids.

The US EPA description of the characteristic of corrosivity  is explained at 40 CFR 261.22.  A careful reading of this regulation is necessary to ensure your hazardous waste determination is accurate and complete.  Good training will help illuminate other areas of the regulations and how they impact your operations.

Inherently Waste-Like

40 CFR 261.2 defines a solid waste as any discarded material not excluded by regulation, variance, or non-waste determination.  A discarded material is any material which is:

  1. Abandoned,
  2. Recycled,
  3. Considered inherently waste-like as described in paragraph (d), or
  4. A military munition

What the US EPA defines as inherently waste-like is explained in detail at 40 CFR 261.2(d), the list is short and industry specific; it includes:

  1. Listed hazardous wastes which are Dioxins:  F020, F021 (unless used as an ingredient to make a product at the site of generation), F022, F023, F026, & F028.  The table of F-listed hazardous waste can be found at 40 CFR 261.31
  2.  Secondary materials fed to a halogen acid furnace that are a listed or characteristic hazardous waste, except for brominated material that meet criteria listed in 40 CFR 261.2(d)(2)(i-iii).  I won’t list those here, you can read the full regulations if you think this applies to you.

Paragraph (d) reads in part, “ The following materials are solid wastes when they are recycled in any manner”.  What if you have no intention of recycling the waste?  Is it still considered to be inherently waste-like?  The answer is yes.  If your waste meets the definition of inherently waste-like, it is considered by regulation to be a discarded material and therefore a solid waste unless it is excluded at 40 CFR 261.4(a).

A quick review of paragraph (d) should be enough to tell you if your waste is inherently waste-like.  The list is subject to change since the US EPA maintains its right to add wastes to the list if it deems it necessary.

The determination of inherently waste-like is just one step of a complete hazardous waste determination that you must make for all waste.  Proper training can help you to identify the steps you must take to maintain compliance.

 

Exception to the Segregation Restrictions of 49 CFR 177.848 for Lab Packs of Hazardous Waste

49 CFR 173.12 contains many exceptions to full regulation for shipments of hazardous waste in a lab pack.  In an earlier blog post I discussed the exception in 173.12(d)that removes the need to include the technical name of a hazardous material when shipping lab packs of hazardous waste with a generic shipping name such as:  Waste Flammable Liquid, n.o.s.  This article will focus on the relief from the requirements to segregate HazMat -including hazardous waste – in transportation, found in 173.12(e).

If the requirements of this section are met – more on that below – then lab packs of hazardous waste are not subject to the segregation requirements of…

  • 49 CFR 174.81(d) for shipments by rail,
  • 49 CFR 176.83(b) for shipments by vessel, or;
  • 49 CFR 177.848(d) for shipments by highway,

The purpose of the segregation restrictions is to prevent the transportation, or storage in transportation, of hazardous materials that may be incompatible and thus pose an unreasonable risk to life, property, or the environment.  However, PHMSA has determined that if packaged properly, the small volumes of hazardous waste in a lab pack can be transported safely without these restrictions.

Note that this exception to the segregation requirements does not apply to shipments by air.  In that case, the requirements of the International Air Transport Association (IATA) must be complied with in addition to and separate from the regulations of the PHMSA/US DOT.

To be subject to the exception, the hazardous waste must be packaged as a lab pack.  The PHMSA doesn’t define a lab pack, instead it refers you to the Appendix C Glossary of the RCRA Compliance Manual 2011 which defines a lab pack as “Drums filled with many small containers packed in non-biodegradable absorbent materials.”   This type of packaging is most commonly used when a hazardous waste generator – not necessarily a “lab” – has many small containers of hazardous waste for disposal.

To use the exception, the lab pack must meet the requirements of 49 CFR 173.12(b) which first specifically identifies the hazardous wastes that may not take advantage of this exception or any other found in this section, they are:

  1. A material poisonous-by-inhalation
  2. A Division 6.1, Packing Group I material
  3. Chloric Acid
  4. Oleum (fuming sulfuric acid)

173.12(b) goes on to identify the Class and Division of lab packed hazardous waste that are authorized to use this exception as long as they are packaged in combination packagings as required by this section (see below) and are shipped for disposal by highway, rail, or cargo vessel; they are:

  • Class 3 Flammable or Combustible Liquid
  • Division 4.1 Flammable Solid
  • Division 4.2 Spontaneously Combustible
  • Division 4.3 Dangerous When Wet
  • Division 5.1 Oxidizer
  • Division 5.2 Organic Peroxide
  • Division 6.1 Poison
  • Class 8 Corrosive
  • Class 9 Miscellaneous

What are the combination packaging requirements of this section that must be used if the hazardous waste lab packs are to utilize the exception?  Well, briefly…

The inner packaging must either be glass of ≤4 L (1 gal) rated capacity or metal or plastic of ≤20 L (5.3 gal) rated capacity.  Inner packagings of liquids must be surrounded by a chemically compatible absorbent material sufficient to absorb the liquid contents.

The outer packaging may contain only one Class of waste material, may not contain incompatibles (ie. acid and base, some organic and inorganic, etc.), and it must be a type of packaging listed in 49 CFR 173.12(b)(2)(ii).  Note that the US EPA land disposal restrictions at 40 CFR 268.42(c) limit the packaging/container you may use if the entire lab pack is going straight to landfill or incineration.  By and large a open-top steel drum of at least packing group III condition will be OK.  Also The gross weight of the combined packaging (inner & outer packaging, absorbents and contents) may not exceed 205 KG (452 lb).

So, before you prepare a lab pack of hazardous waste for off-site shipment, ask yourself, “Is it…

  • not a prohibited material?
  • an authorized Class or Division?
  • to be shipped by highway, rail, or cargo vessel?
  • packaged in compliance with combination packaging requirements of 49 CFR 173.12(b)(2)(ii)?

If you answered ‘yes’ to all of the above, then lab pack shipments of the hazardous waste are not subject to the transportation segregation restrictions if they also are blocked and braced so that they are separated from incompatible materials by at least 4 feet horizontally and maintained at least 4 inches off the floor of the vehicle.

I suggest you read 173.12(e) as necessary for a full description of additional requirements for shipments of the following incompatible materials.

  1. The vehicle may not contain Class 1 explosives, Class 7 radioactive, or uncontainerized hazardous waste.
  2. Waste cyanides and waste acids must be packaged as specified in 173.12(e)(2).
  3. Waste Division 4.2 Spontaneously Combustible and Class 8 Corrosive Liquids must be packaged as specified in 173.12(e)(3).
  4. Waste Division 6.1, PG I, Hazard Zone A Poison Inhalation Hazards and Class 3, Class 8 liquids, or Division 4.1, 4.2, 4.3, 5.1, and 5.2 materials must be packaged as specified in 173.12(3)(4).
In the scope of a blog post like this, and with so many variable possible, I can only hope to outline the regulations and point you in the right direction to find the answer for yourself.  If you ship lab packs of hazardous waste, you should make you and your HazMat Employees very familiar with 49 CFR 173.12.

 

Extensions to the 90/180 Day On-Site Accumulation Time Limits for Hazardous Waste Generators

If you are a generator of hazardous waste, one regulatory requirement you are no doubt familiar with are the limits on the number of days you may accumulate hazardous waste on-site without a permit.  These limits are:

  1. Large Quantity Generator (LQG) – no more than 90 days.
  2. Small Quantity Generator (SQG) – no more than 180 days.
  3. Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator (CESQG); aka: Very Small Quantity Generator (VSQG) in some states, no time limit.

Take this brief survey to determine your hazardous waste generator status if you are unsure.  There are exceptions to every rule, however, as there are exceptions to the 0n-site accumulation time limits for LQGs and SQGs.

Extensions available to LQGs found throughout 40 CFR 262.34:

  1. 262.34(b) allows an LQG to accumulate hazardous waste on-site beyond 90 days if they have been granted an extension by the USEPA for “unforeseen, temporary, and uncontrollable circumstances”.  The extension may be for up to 30 days and is granted at the discretion of the Agency on a case-by-case basis.
  2. 262.34(g) allows an LQG who also generates an F006 listed hazardous waste (wastewater treatment sludges from electroplating operations) to accumulate the F006 listed hazardous waste only on-site for up to 180 days.  No notification to the US EPA is necessary, however, the generator must comply with the requirements of 262.34(g)(1-4) to take advantage of this exception (read about the F006 waste extension).
  3. 262.34(h) allows LQGs who take advantage of 262.34(g) to extend their on-site accumulation beyond 180 days to 270 days if its Treatment Storage and Disposal Facility (TSDF) is at least 200 miles away or greater from its facility.  The generator doesn’t need to gain the permission of the USEPA in order to take advantage of this extension, though be prepared to explain why you chose a TSDF 200 miles away instead of one closer.
  4. 262.34(i), similar to 262.34(b), allows for a 30 day extension of the 180 or the 270 day limit for F006 waste if the generator is granted an extension from the USEPA due to, “unforeseen, temporary, and uncontrollable circumstances”.  As before, this extension is granted at the discretion of the Agency on a case-by-case basis.

Like this article?

Subscribe to my Monthly Newsletter

No marketing emails!

Extensions available to SQG’s also found in 40 CFR 262.34:

  1. 262.34(e) allows an SQG to accumulate hazardous waste on-site for up to 270 days if its TSDF is at least 200 miles away or greater from its facility.  The generator doesn’t need to gain the permission of the US EPA in order to take advantage of this extension.  Be prepared to justify your selection of a TSDF that is 200 miles away or more.
  2. 262.34(f) allows an SQG to accumulate hazardous waste on-site beyond 180 or 270 days if they have been granted an extension by the USEPA for “unforeseen, temporary, and uncontrollable circumstances”.  The extension may be for up to 30 days and is granted at the discretion of the Agency on a case-by-case basis.

262.34(j-l) lists extensions available to Performance Track Members, but don’t waste time on these, the National Environmental Performance Track is kaput.

If your shipment of hazardous waste is rejected by the designated facility for some reason, 262.34(m) allows both LQGs and SQGs in this situation to manage their waste subject to the routine 90/180 day time limits, request an extension from the Agency for an additional 30 days, or – for SQGs only – keep the waste for up to 270 days if the TSDF is 200 miles away or greater.

There is one more extension to the 90/180 time limit allowed by regulation and that is for hazardous waste in Satellite Accumulation Areas pursuant to 40 CFR 262.34(c).  This exception allows unlimited time for on-site accumulation of hazardous waste (some states differ) without permit  or permission from the USEPA, it does however, come with some rather vague requirements that I will address in a later article.

Contact me with any questions you may have about the generation, identification, management, and disposal of hazardous waste

Daniels Training Services

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

The regulations can seem strict and unyielding, but built into them are exceptions that may make your life as a hazardous waste generator easier if you know where they are and how to use them.  Proper training can point you in the right direction.

US EPA Compliance and Enforcement Annual Report for 2011

You are no doubt aware that the US Environmental Protection Agency is serious about enforcing its regulations in order to live up to its mandate to protect the environment.  The Office of Enforcement and Compliance Assurance (OECA) within the US EPA is tasked with carrying out this enforcement through a variety of measures.  From its website, the OECA…  “aggressively goes after pollution problems that make a difference in communities through vigorous civil and criminal enforcement that targets the most serious water, air and chemical hazards. OECA also advances environmental justice by protecting vulnerable communities.”

How do they do this?  Again, from its website:  “Through improved transparency and community participation, we are enlisting the public’s assistance to ensure compliance nationwide, and that no entity enjoys an unfair economic advantage from noncompliance with the nation’s environmental laws.” It’s the reference to “…improved transparency and community participation…” that should be of concern to the regulated community.  I am in favor of transparency.  I think our businesses, government, and communities function better when we have equal access to public information.  As a business, however, you should be aware that to a greater degree than ever before, information about your company – especially the results of inspections, investigations, and enforcement actions – are made available to the public.

One example of this is the US EPA Compliance and Enforcement Annual Results for 2011 Fiscal Year.  This website contains a wealth of information about US EPA’s enforcement and compliance activities for the year just past.  It includes a lot of bare statistics of interest that you may wish to peruse, but of more interest to the regulated community is the Enforcement Cases Map.  Once opened, you may select or unselect the type of enforcement activities you are interested in, in my case “Waste”.  The map will then reveal the location of all US EPA investigations that resulted in enforcement for violations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).  Click on a location and you may read information about the site.  Select “More Information” and you are taken to the US EPA’s website:  Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO).  Here you find a “Detailed Facility Report” which contains a snapshot of the facility’s compliance history with the US EPA, not just waste, but air, water, emergency reporting, and more.

It has been – and will continue to be – a priority of the Obama administration to make public information easily available to the public.  As a business, you need to be aware of this reality and be prepared to take the following steps:

  1. Review any information about your company that is made public to ensure it is accurate.  Make corrections if it is not.
  2. Communicate proactively with your neighbors, community, state, region, etc. to inform them of what you are doing to maintain your business within the limits of the regulations.  Also inform them of any efforts beyond the regulations to reduce, reuse, and recycle.
  3. Avoid violations in the first place by ensuring compliance with the regulations.

For this last point, I suggest you attend one of my EPA & PHMSA/DOT open enrollment training events.  There, in one day, you will get a good understanding of the US EPA regulations for the management of hazardous waste and the PHMSA/DOT regulations for the transportation of hazardous materials.

If you have many employees to train, contact me for on-site training where for one flat fee of $1,749 for one day I can train as many as you need.

Hazardous Waste Determination: D001 Ignitable

A person that generates any waste is required to determine if that waste is a hazardous waste pursuant to the method identified in 40 CFR 262.11.  The US EPA has identified two different categories of hazardous waste:  listed and characteristic.  To be listed a hazardous waste must meet the defined use or status documented at 40 CFR 261, Subpart D.  As there are no approved test methods for the determination of a listed waste; generators must rely on their knowledge of the wastes origins.  Listed wastes include the following:

  • F-listed waste from non-specific manufacturing process sources –waste codes F001 to F039.
  • K-listed waste from specific manufacturing process sources – waste codes K001 to K181.
  • P & U-listed waste from discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill clean-up materials – waste codes P001 to P205 and U001 to U411.

The other category of hazardous waste:  characteristic, must exhibit specific characteristic as defined at 40 CFR 261, Subpart C.  To determine the presence of hazardous waste characteristics, a hazardous waste generator may rely solely on their knowledge of the waste and the process of generation, but the better method is lab analysis by a US EPA-approved test method of a representative sample.  Characteristic hazardous waste includes the following:

hazardous waste containersIgnitable hazardous waste as defined at 40 CFR 261.21 may have one of four properties:

  • A liquid with a flash point of <140˚F.
  • A solid that can cause a fire and sustain combustion.
  • An ignitable compressed gas.
  • An oxidizer.

The above four bullet points only skim the surface of the properties that would cause a waste to be identified as an ignitable hazardous waste.  The purpose of this article is to dig deeper into these properties to gain a better understanding of ignitable hazardous waste and perhaps cause you to rethink how you are currently applying the D001 waste code to your hazardous waste.  We’ll look at each of the properties one at a time; I suggest you print a copy of the regulations – it’s only two pages – and follow along.

A liquid with a flash point of <140˚F:

How 40 CFR 261.21(a)(1) reads:  “It is a liquid, other than an aqueous solution containing less than 24 percent alcohol by volume and has a flash point less than 60˚C (140˚F)…”  It goes on to reference the two approved test methods for determining flash point of the liquid which must be used.

A bottle of wine

Don’t worry, it’s not a D001 Ignitable hazardous waste!

The first point of interest is the exception for aqueous solutions containing <24% alcohol.  This is interesting because though it was placed in the regulation solely to remove alcoholic beverages and certain latex paints from being categorized as an ignitable liquid, it has the affect of exempting from regulation as a D001 Ignitable all aqueous wastes which are ignitable solely because they contain alcohols (i.e. any chemical containing the hydroxyl [-OH] functional group) (RO 11060).

The second, and potentially much more important, point of interest is the requirement that the waste be a liquid in order to test for flash point.  So…no liquid, no test for flash point, no liquid flash <140˚F, no ignitable hazardous waste (RO 14669, RO 14405).  This is true even if the solid, with no liquid present, flashes at <140˚F.  To meet this requirement, the waste must contain a free liquid that fails the paint filter test.  The determining factor – the flash point – is run on that liquid only.  This property should be determined entirely by careful analysis of representative samples.  Be sure the lab conducting the analysis is aware of your needs.

A solid that can cause a fire and sustain combustion:

A solid without free liquids may still be an ignitable hazardous waste if it exhibits the properties of a solid that can cause a fire and sustain combustion.  40 CFR 261.21(a)(2) reads, “It is not a liquid and is capable, under standard temperature and pressure, of causing fire through friction, absorption of moisture or spontaneous chemical changes and, when ignited, burns so vigorously and persistently that it creates a hazard.”  Refer again to RO 14669 and you will read, “The Agency has not developed specific regulatory or guidance tests to implement this portion of the regulation.”  It is referring to its lack of a single approved test method to identify a solid ignitable hazardous waste in full.  RO 14405 references  SW-846 Method 1030, Ignitability of Solids as a means to assess a solids ability to burn vigorously, but not its mode of ignition; and so may not be used to make a complete determination.  Note that the requirement for this property is that it both cause a fire by itself and sustain combustion to the point that it causes a hazard.  You will have to use a combination of tests and generator knowledge to make a determination if this property is present in your waste.

An ignitable compressed gas:

I won’t reprint all of the regulation here, as it is long, technical, and my transcription won’t aid understanding.  Instead, I suggest you read it directly from 40 CFR 261.21(a)(3)(i) if you generate any waste that might be an ignitable compressed gas.  As you read, consider the two distinct descriptions in this subparagraph of…

  1. A compressed gas in sub-subparagraph (i); and,
  2. An ignitable compressed gas in sub-subparagraph (ii).

Note that the determination of a compressed gas’ ignitability relies on test methods approved by the Bureau of Explosives (how do I get a job with them?) and the Pipeline and Hazardous Technology of the Department of Transportation.

An oxidizer:

Class 5 Oxidizer placard

USDOT regulations include a definition of an Oxidizer

The hazard of an oxidizer is that it is capable of releasing oxygen during a chemical reaction and multiplying the danger of a fire.  40 CFR 261.21(a)(4) reads, “An oxidizer for the purpose of this subchapter is a substance such as a chlorate, permanganate, inorganic peroxide, or a nitrate, that yields oxygen readily to stimulate the combustion of organic matter.”  Sub-subparagraph (i) includes organic peroxides as an oxidizer unless other conditions in the subparagraph exclude it.  Like the ignitable compressed gas, the regulatory description is long and technical, so I won’t include it here.  And like the flammable solid, this property does not have a test method; instead the chemical structure of the material determines whether or not the waste is hazardous for ignitability as an oxidizer.  Be sure you have Material Safety Data Sheets or other sources of information with the chemical composition of your waste available as you read the regulations and determine if this property of ignitability applies to your waste.

Summary:

The ignitability hazardous waste characteristic identifies wastes that pose a significant fire risk due either to their low flash point, ability to self-combust and burn, or are able to combust or support combustion due to their physical properties.  If any one of the above properties is present, you must manage the waste as a D001 ignitable hazardous waste.  Keep in mind that other characteristic or listed waste codes may apply to the waste as well.  Conversely, take a second look at some of the wastes you’ve identified as ignitable, a close review of the above information and some careful analysis may reveal them to not meet the definition of ignitability.

Be sure to check with your state environmental regulatory agency or regional US EPA to determine their interpretation of the above, especially the determination of ignitability for solids that are contaminated with flammable liquids, such as wipers. The US EPA has been proposing regulation for solvent-contaminated wipers for years (perhaps 2012 is the year for a final rule, stay tuned) but in the meantime many states have gone ahead with US EPA’s blessing to create state-specific interpretations.

Daniels Training Services

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

The above is only one small part of the hazardous waste determination process, which is something you must document for every waste that you generate.  The determination itself is only the first step in identifying your hazardous waste generator status and then the regulations you must follow based on your status.  It may seem overwhelming, but there is a way to make sense of US EPA’s hazardous waste regulations: attend one of my open enrollment training events.  Held nationwide and year round there is sure to be one in your area soon.  Or contact me to schedule on-site training for all of your employees for one flat fee.  If you liked this article, be sure to sign up for my monthly newsletter to receive more like it via email.  I look forward to hearing from you.