RCRA

January 2015 – Rules & Regulations, Proposed Rules, and Notices Regarding the Management of Hazardous Waste and the Transportation of Hazardous Materials

On its website the US Government Printing Office makes a wealth of Federal publications available for review and download; one of these is the Federal Register.

Federal Register logo

The Federal Register is the tool used by the US Government to communicate with interested parties

Published by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), the Federal Register is the official daily publication for rules, proposed rules, and notices of Federal agencies and organizations, as well as executive orders and other presidential documents.

See below for a brief summary of announcements in the Federal Register by the US EPA on the subject of Hazardous Waste and the Pipeline & Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) of the US DOT on the subject of Transportation of Hazardous Materials.

The Federal Register is a great way to look down the road and see potential changes to the regulations long before they are put into effect (sometimes The Rulemaking Process takes years before a final rule is issued, if ever).  Knowledge of these potential changes provides you with several advantages:

  • Additional time to modify your business operations to comply.
  • Awareness of on what topics the regulatory agencies intend to focus their efforts.
  • The ability to register your concerns, complaints, suggestions, etc. in order to modify the proposed rule before a final rule is issued.  It can be done, really!
  • Make changes to your training program to account for changes that become effective before the next training cycle.
  • Alert you to the need to re-train your employees prior to their next scheduled training cycle, if necessary.
  • Keep you abreast of changes to the regulations that affect your business and/or your industry group.

Please note that this is my best effort to identify the relevant announcements in the Federal Register that may be of interest to generators of hazardous waste and shippers of hazardous materials.  I encourage you to review the list of Federal Register publications yourself to ensure regulatory compliance.

January 1, 2015 through January 31, 2015

Logo for US Environmental Protection AgencyUSEPA – US Environmental Protection Agency:

Publications not related to the management of hazardous waste, solid waste, universal waste, or used oil are not included here.

Rules and Regulations:

Definition of Solid Waste Pages 1693 – 1814 [FR DOC # 2014-30382] PDF | Text | More

Georgia: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management Program Revisions Pages 3888 – 3891 [FR DOC # 2015-01040] PDF | Text | More

Proposed Rules:

Lead-Based Paint Programs; Amendment to Jurisdiction-Specific Certification and Accreditation Requirements and Renovator Refresher Training Requirements Pages 1873 – 1880 [FR DOC # 2015-00473] PDF | Text | More

Is the waste generated during lead-based paint removal from a home a hazardous waste? Find out here:  The Household Hazardous Waste Exclusion

Georgia: Final Authorization of State Hazardous Waste Management Program Revisions Pages 3936 – 3936 [FR DOC # 2015-01039] PDF | Text | More

Contact me with any questions you may have about the management of hazardous waste

Daniels Training Services

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

 

Notices:

None

FAA – Federal Aviation Administration:

Publications not related to the transportation of hazardous materials are not included here.

Rules and Regulations:

None

Proposed Rules:

None

Notices:

None

FMCSA – Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration:

Publications not related to the transportation of hazardous materials are not included here.

Rules and Regulations:

None

Proposed Rules:

None

Notices:

None

FRA – Federal Railroad Administration:

Publications not related to the transportation of hazardous materials are not included here.

Rules and Regulations:

None

Proposed Rules:

None

Notices:

Petition for Waiver of Compliance Pages 1469 – 1470 [FR DOC # 2015-00114] PDF | Text | More

Logo for the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA)PHMSA – Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration:

Publications not related to the transportation of hazardous materials are not included here.

Rules and Regulations:

Hazardous Materials: Harmonization With International Standards (RRR) Pages 1075 – 1169 [FR DOC # 2014-30462] PDF | Text | More

Proposed Rules:

Hazardous Materials: Miscellaneous Amendments (RRR) Pages 3787 – 3838 [FR DOC # 2015-00265] PDF | Text | More

Hazardous Materials: Adoption of Special Permits (MAP-21) (RRR) Pages 5339 – 5449 [FR DOC # 2015-01263] PDF | Text | More

Notices:

Delayed Applications Pages 105 – 106 [FR DOC # 2014-30557] PDF | Text | More

Notice of Application for Special Permits Pages 104 – 105 [FR DOC # 2014-30538] PDF | Text | More

Notice of Application for Modification of Special Permit Pages 275 – 276 [FR DOC # 2014-30550] PDF | Text | More

Actions on Special Permit Applications Pages 920 – 921 [FR DOC # 2014-30546] PDF | Text | More

Delayed Applications Pages 2777 – 2778 [FR DOC # 2015-00707]                PDF | Text | More

Notice of Application for Special Permits Pages 2778 – 2779 [FR DOC # 2015-00706] PDF | Text | More

Notice of Application for Modification of Special Permit Pages 3012 – 3013 [FR DOC # 2015-00705] PDF | Text | More

Actions on Special Permit Applications Pages 3311 – 3312 [FR DOC # 2015-00678] PDF | Text | More

Information can be helpful but it’s useless if you are not able to make sense of it.  You must be able to determine how any changes to the rules and regulations (final or proposed) will affect your operations, and communicate the necessary information to your personnel.  I can help you to do that.

Contact me with any questions you may have about the transportation of hazardous materials by air, highway, vessel, or rail

International and Domestic

Daniels Training Services

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

 

 

Please contact me for a free training consultation to determine your regulatory requirements and how training can help you to attain and maintain compliance with the regulations of the US Environmental Protection Agency (and your state) and the PHMSA, FAA, FRA, & FMCSA of the US Department Of Transportation.

What Counts When Counting Hazardous Waste?

If you discard anything from your home, business, or government office you are a generator of a solid waste.  As a generator of solid waste you are required to conduct a Hazardous Waste Determination to determine if your solid waste is subject to regulation – perhaps it is conditionally excluded from regulation as a hazardous waste if it is a Household Hazardous Waste – and what kind of hazardous waste it is (Listed, Characteristic, or both).

Note:

As of the effective date of the Generator Improvements Rule on May 30, 2017 the Federal regulations referenced in this article have changed.

The USEPA regulations for counting of hazardous waste to determine generator category are now found at 40 CFR 262.17(a)(7).

The regulations of your state may still refer to the original location of the Federal regulations.

I have written an article to address the new regulations for counting of hazardous waste and determination of generator category.

 

Once you have identified the hazardous waste you generate you are required to determine your hazardous waste generator status.  This is important since compliance with the RCRA regulations of the USEPA and your state will depend on your hazardous waste generator status.  It’s no surprise that the higher your hazardous waste generator status, the greater your regulatory burden.  The purpose of this article is to provide guidance in determining what wastes to consider and count when you are determining your hazardous waste generator status for the purpose of compliance with the RCRA regulations. (more…)

What are USEPA Special Wastes and the Bentsen & Bevill Wastes?

When the US Congress passed the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) on October 21, 1976 it did not identify hazardous waste.  Instead it required the USEPA (founded December 2, 1970) to identify a hazardous waste (either by meeting a listing definition or by its characteristics) and ensure its cradle-to-grave management to prevent harm to human health and the environment.  On December 18, 1978 USEPA responded to this mandate by proposing regulations for the management of hazardous waste under Subtitle C of RCRA.  At this time it also proposed that certain wastes – six (6) categories of them – be deferred from management as a hazardous waste until further study could be conducted to determine the actual risk they posed to human health and the environment.  This deferral was believed justified since the wastes, which came to be known as “Special Wastes”, were generated in large quantities and were believed – at the time – to pose less risk to human health and the environment than the hazardous wastes for which cradle-to-grave regulation was proposed.  The “Special Wastes” proposed by USEPA were:USEPA Special Wastes

(Refer to the link for each of the above for more information regarding that Special Waste.)
With the ball back in their court, on October 12, 1980 the US Congress passed the Solid Waste Disposal Act Amendments of 1980. Among other changes to RCRA, the SWDA Amendments now exempted from regulation as a hazardous waste the Special Wastes identified by the USEPA in 1978.  The exempted wastes became associated with the Congressmen who sponsored the amendments and thus came to be known as the Bentsen and Bevill wastes on behalf of Senator Lloyd Bentsen and Representative Thomas Bevill, respectively.  Their amendments applied as follows:

Cement Kiln Dust is a USEPA Special Waste

Cement Kiln Dust is a USEPA Special Waste

Like this article?

Subscribe to my Monthly Newsletter

No marketing emails!

The Bevill Amendment—fly ash waste, bottom ash waste, slag waste, and flue gas emission control waste generated primarily from the combustion of coal or other fossil fuels; solid waste from the extraction, beneficiation, and processing of ores and minerals, including phosphate rock and overburden from the mining of uranium ore; and cement kiln dust.  Encompassing the USEPA Special Wastes:  Cement kiln dust; Mining waste, Phosphate rock mining, beneficiation, and processing waste, Uranium waste, & Utility waste (i.e., fossil fuel combustion waste).
The Bentsen Amendment—drilling fluids, produced waters, and other wastes associated with the exploration, development, and production of crude oil or natural gas or geothermal energy.  This amendment corresponded to the USEPA Special Waste for: Oil and gas drilling muds and oil production brines.

So…
USEPA Special Waste  ≡ Bentsen and Bevill Waste

While the exemption lasted, the USEPA was required to complete a full assessment of each Special Waste and submit a formal report to Congress on its findings. The USEPA was given specific requirements for each Special Waste study and deadlines were established for submission of the final reports.  After completion of each respective final report (aka: “Report to Congress”), USEPA had six months to determine if the Special Waste in question should be managed as a hazardous waste.

Drilling for oil

The exploration, production, and development of crude oil, natural gas, and geothermal energy may generate a Special Waste

USEPA issued a Report to Congress for each Special Waste between 1988 and 2002 and the final regulatory determinations have been made.  With limited exceptions, the agency determined that regulation under Subtitle C was not warranted for the Bentsen and Bevill Wastes/Special Wastes.  This then required the revision of Federal regulations in order to exclude, with conditions, the Special Waste from regulation as hazardous waste.  These conditional exclusions can be found today at 40 CFR 261.4(b), and look like this:

Mining operations

Several mining wastes are Special Wastes

40 CFR §261.4(b) – Solid Wastes Which Are Not Hazardous Waste

  • §261.4(b)(1) Household Hazardous Waste
  • §261.4(b)(2) Agricultural Waste
  • §261.4(b)(3) Mining Overburden
  • §261.4(b)(4) Fossil Fuel Combustion Waste (Bevill Amendment)
  • §261.4(b)(5) Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Wastes (Bentsen Amendment)
  • §261.4(b)(6) Trivalent Chromium Wastes
  • §261.4(b)(7) Mining and Mineral Processing Wastes (Bevill Amendment)
  • §261.4(b)(8) Cement Kiln Dust (Bevill Amendment)
  • §261.4(b)(9) Arsenically Treated Wood
  • §261.4(b)(10) Petroleum Contaminated Media & Debris from Underground Storage Tanks
  • §261.4(b)(11) Injected Groundwater
  • §261.4(b)(12) Spent Chloroflurocarbon Refrigerants
  • §261.4(b)(13) Used Oil Filters
  • §261.4(b)(14) Used Oil Distillation Bottoms
  • §261.4(b)(15) Landfill Leachate or Gas Condensate Derived from Certain Listed Wastes
  • §261.4(b)(17) Project XL Pilot Project Exclusions
  • §261.4(b)(18) Disposable Solvent-Contaminated Wipes (not Trichloroethylene)

Training Services I provide for HazMat Employees & Hazardous Waste Personnel:

So now you’re thinking, “Wait.  There are six USEPA Special Wastes.  Yet, their are only four RCRA conditional exclusions identified at 40 CFR 261.4(b).  What gives?”  The answer is that three of the original Special Wastes:  Mining waste; Phosphate rock mining, beneficiation, and processing waste; and Uranium waste are wrapped up into one exclusion:  §261.4(b)(7) Mining and Mineral Processing Wastes; which reflects how they were addressed in the Bevill Amendments of 1978.

Utility

The combustion of fossil fuels to generate energy may create a Special Waste

So that settles it, right?  Well, not exactly…

Two original members of the USEPA Special Wastes that were converted into conditional exclusions at 40 CFR 261.4(b) have more recently come under increased scrutiny due primarily to two potential threats to human health and the environment that were not anticipated or investigated in the earlier Reports to Congress:

  • The volume of generation.
  • Higher levels of toxicity.

Daniels Training Services

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

The two wastes that are the subject of recent controversy:

What’s next for these Bentsen and Bevill wastes?  Stay tuned.

Remember, Special Wastes, though conditionally excluded from being a hazardous waste, remain a solid waste subject to State regulation under Subtitle D of RCRA.

Contact me if you have any questions about Special Wastes, or for a free RCRA Training Consultation.

Components of Compliance: The Law, Regulations, and Guidance & Policy Documents

While most of the regulated community have some knowledge of the applicable regulations which with they must comply; and a passing familiarity with USEPA Guidance and Policy Documents; and a vague awareness of the law upon which they are all based; many lack a complete understanding of the relationship of these resources to their responsibility as a generator of hazardous waste.  The purpose of this article is to explain the role of these three elements:  the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the USEPA – and State – regulations, and Guidance & Policy Documents of both the USEPA and your state. (more…)

Retail Sector: USEPA Wants to Hear From you re. Your Hazardous Waste Management

The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)  is aware of the difficulties faced by the retail sector in complying with the hazardous waste regulations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).  Complications specific to the retail sector include:

  • A large number of diverse products that may become a RCRA hazardous waste when discarded.
  • A need to make numerous hazardous waste determinations.
  • Multiple (sometimes thousands) of sites.
  • Management of waste routinely conducted by those with limited experience with or knowledge of RCRA regulations.

In order to address these and other hazardous waste management challenges and ensure the proper and safe “cradle to grave” management of hazardous waste, EPA is considering the development of hazardous waste regulations specific to the retail sector.  Before it can draft these regulations, the EPA is seeking to gain additional information about hazardous waste generation and management within the retail sector from the industry and other interested parties.  One effort to gain this information is the publication of a NODA (Notice of Data Availability) in the Federal Register on February 14, 2014 (79 FR 8926).

The purpose of the NODA is to present information assembled by the EPA during previous listening sessions and to provide an opportunity for stakeholders (not just the retail sector, but any  interested parties) to comment on this information.  It also offers the opportunity to provide additional information about any RCRA-related issues faced by the retail sector.

Additional Information Sought From Commenters by this NODA:

  1. Suggestions for improving the RCRA hazardous waste policies, guidances and regulations for retail operations.
  2. Information about the retail universe and the hazardous waste generated.
  3. Information about episodic generation of hazardous waste.
  4. Information about retail stores’ hazardous waste programs.
  5. Information about hazardous waste employee training.
  6. Information about aerosol cans.
  7. Information about transportation and reverse logistics.
  8. Information about reverse logistic centers.
  9. Information about sustainability efforts under taken by retail facilities.

Within the NODA are suggested questions for each of the nine (9) categories of information sought by EPA.  While not limited to these questions, commenters are encouraged to use them as a guide for providing input.

The NODA also identifies methods for submitting comments and who to contact for further information.

And finally, just what does EPA mean by “the retail sector”?  See the table below.

NAICS Codes of Entities Potentially Affected by this Notice

NAICS Code Description of NAICS Code
441 Motor Vehicle and Parts Dealers
442 Furniture and Home Furnishing Stores
443 Electronics and Appliance Stores
444 Building Material and Garden Equipment and Supplies Dealers
445 Food and Beverage Stores
446 Health and Personal Care Stores
447 Gasoline Stations
448 Clothing and Clothing Accessories Stores
451 Sporting Goods, Hobby, Book, and Music Stores
452 General Merchandise Stores
453 Miscellaneous Store Retailers
454 Nonstore Retailers
722 Food Services and Drinking Places

Are you a member of the retail sector or do you have an interest in how hazardous waste is managed within the retail sector?  If so, then take advantage of this NODA from the USEPA to have your voice be heard and possibly influence the regulations that may result.

But hurry!  The deadline for comments is April 15, 2014.  Or it was anyway.  The EPA recently extended the deadline to May 30th, read about it here.

KC Company Pleads Guilty To Illegally Transporting Hazardous Waste

KANSAS CITY, Mo. – Tammy Dickinson, United States Attorney for the Western District of Missouri, announced that a Kansas City, Mo., company pleaded guilty in federal court today to illegally transporting hazardous waste.

Z-Group, LLC, is a Kansas company registered to do business in Missouri. Company president Friedrich-Wilhelm Zschietzschmann represented the company in court today to plead guilty before U.S. District Judge Brian C. Wimes to illegally transporting hazardous waste.

Zschietzschmann was also the president and CEO of Z-International, Inc., which specialized in the labeling industry.  Z-International used large quantities of ink and ink-related products in its business, making labels for numerous companies all over the world.  Z-International was located at 110 East 16th Street, Kansas City, Mo. Z-Group was established in 2001 by Zschietzschmann to serve as owner of real estate where Z-International operated its business.

Z-International was closed by Zschietzschmann in July 2010.  Any assets or fixtures remaining on the property after the business closed were sold or otherwise disposed of by a Z-International employee.

Between July 2010 and April 2012, the company authorized personnel to hire others to transport hazardous waste to a separate location. Z-International employees authorized the transportation of 23 containers of varying sizes that contained liquid hazardous waste to Studer Container Service, 520 Madison Ave., Kansas City, Mo. Studer did not have a permit to receive hazardous waste.

In April 2012, Environmental Protection Agency officials conducted a compliance inspection at Studer.  During the inspection, EPA inspectors found several containers of what appeared to be hazardous materials.

On June 28, 2012, EPA began its sampling and clean-up operation. On Dec. 21, 2012, the EPA National Enforcement Investigations Center provided analytical results for 38 samples collected from the containers dumped at Studer. Five of the samples tested positive for ignitability and two of the samples tested positive for toxicity.

The EPA Superfund Program cleaned up the hazardous waste at Studer to eliminate possible adverse effects on human health and environment. The total EPA Superfund cost was $36,871.

Under the terms of today’s plea agreement, Z-Group must pay a $50,000 fine and $36,871 in restitution, for a total payment of $86,871. The company is also subject to up to five years of probation. A sentencing hearing will be scheduled after the completion of a presentence investigation by the United States Probation Office.

This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jane Pansing Brown. It was investigated by the Environmental Protection Agency, Criminal Investigation Division.

Read the full release here.

The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the regulations based upon it (both USEPA and State) mandate “cradle-to-grave” responsibility for all hazardous waste.  The RCRA regulations, however, only apply to active hazardous waste sites.  The regulations of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and its amendments, collectively known as “Superfund”, have the authority to clean up closed or abandoned sites that are contaminated with Hazardous Substances, which is the case here.  Either way, it is the generator of the hazardous waste that will be held responsible for the clean-up costs.

Contact me with questions about disposal options for your hazardous waste and to ensure you receive the best training that will help you to avoid situations such as this.

EPA Proposes Remedy at World Resources Company, Pottsville, Norwegian Township, PA

News Release: Public Information and Availability Session
08/06/2013

 

What:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will present information and take questions from the community on the proposed remedy for the World Resources Company (WRC) facility, located at 170 Walnut Lane, Pottsville, Pa. 17901. The facility has conducted an investigation and sampling at the site in accordance with the requirements of the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Corrective Action Program. Corrective Action is an EPA program designed to guide the investigation, and any cleanup of contaminated hazardous waste.

When:

August 12, 2013 at 7:00 p.m.

Where:

Norwegian Township Building, 506 Maple Avenue, Mar Lin, Pa. 17951-0251

Background:

WRC recycles metal bearing sludges that are generated primarily by metal finishing and electroplating industries. Some of these sludges are considered hazardous waste under EPA and Pennsylvania Law. Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments were conducted at the facility. Five monitoring wells were installed for soil and groundwater. Soil samples were collected. Environmental sampling showed no contaminants above either EPA or PADEP residential standards. WRC continues to do groundwater and soil monitoring approximately twice a year, and has since 1990. No known releases have occurred at the facility resulting in investigation or remedial actions.

Proposed Remedy:

EPA will propose this week that there are no known environmental issues at the property that have not been addressed. EPA’s investigation has found that there is no contamination at the site. The proposed Final Decision is for “no further action” and will be documented in a Statement of Basis and subject to public review and comment.

Public Comment:

Persons wishing to comment on the proposed remedy may do so by submitting their comments to EPA betweenAugust 14 and September 27, 2013. All comments must be submitted in writing via mail, fax, or email to EPA Project Manager Catheryn Blankenbiller, at U.S. EPA Region 3, 1650 Arch Street, Mailcode 3LC30, Philadelphia, Pa. 19103 (Email: blankenbiller.catheryn@epa.gov; Fax: 215-814-3113.  All comments will be considered in making a final decision.

Contact: Donna Heron at 215-814-2665 / heron.donna@epa.gov

It is interesting to note that this situation is being handled by both the State of Pennsylvania DEP and the USEPA under the authority of the Corrective Action program of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and not Superfund.  This is because the site is still active.  If it were an abandoned site or one where ownership could not be determined, then the determination of contamination and potential clean-up would be undertaken with the authority of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA, aka:  Superfund) and not RCRA.

Please don’t hesitate to contact me if you have questions about the regulations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) for the USEPA or your State.

The Management of Hazardous Waste Generated Off-Shore

The regulations of the the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) apply generally to any hazardous waste generated, transported, treated, stored, or disposed of within the US.  But what of a hazardous waste generated in waters off the coast of the US, perhaps on a vessel or an oil platform or rig?  The purpose of this article is to explain the applicability of the hazardous waste regulations of the USEPA and the HazMat Transportation regulations of the USDOT/PHMSA to the generation and transportation of hazardous waste within and without US territorial waters. (more…)

The History of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

In the beginning…there was unregulated disposal of waste generated by commercial and industrial facilities, both public and private.  Today there are the hazardous waste regulations written and enforced by the US Environmental Protection Agency and individual states if they have an approved hazardous waste program.  So, what was life like for what we now refer to as the “Regulated Community” before there were regulations?  Pretty simple for them, but not so good for the environment. Get ready for a history of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.

A common industry practice in those days was to dispose of hazardous waste onsite by burying, burning, or indefinite storage or have it shipped offsite for something similar.  In either case records were not required nor kept.  Not only did this cause damage to the environment, but the lack of recordkeeping made it impossible for property owners to know what, if any, pollutants were on their property due to past activities.

One cause of this pollution is a flaw in capitalism – a system I love – known as the Tragedy of the Commons.  Basically the cost for damage to the environment caused by a polluter were borne by all instead of just the polluter.  Thus an incentive for polluters to dispose of waste in the cheapest and the least environmentally-friendly manner possible:  open dumping.

Another cause was that the regulation of waste was not thought to be the responsibility of the Federal government and was left to state and local government.  This resulted in an inconsistent patchwork of regulations throughout the country.  The inter-state transportation of hazardous waste, not to mention the ability of pollutants to cross borders on their own, made effective regulation impossible.

A factor that exacerbated the situation was the increase in the volume and toxicity of waste generated starting in the 1960’s.  Note the following statistics from 25 Years of RCRA:  Building on our Past to Protect our Future:

  • In the decade between 1950 and 1960, the amount of trash individuals created increased 60 percent.
  • In 1965, more than four million chemicals were being produced in the U.S. and synthetic chemical manufacturing
    was on the rise.

By the 1960’s it was clear that something had to change.

This resulted in the 1965 passage of the Solid Waste Disposal Act (SWDA).  The SWDA did not emphasize the regulation of waste throughout its lifecycle, but instead focused on training and research as a means to identify methods to manage waste.  It did, however, set minimum standards for local landfills.  It had little to no effect on generators of hazardous waste.

The SWDA was amended in 1970 by the Resource Recovery Act (RRA).  The RRA emphasized the recovery of energy and materials from solid waste over disposal.  Even with this amendment the regulations were still nothing like we know them today.  For example:  open dumping of waste was not yet banned, companies did not have “Cradle to Grave” responsibility for the hazardous waste they generated, and there was no permit program for hazardous waste generators, transporters, or disposal facilities.

All of that changed in 1976 with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) which was merely an amendment to the SWDA of 1965, and has been amended itself many times since.  However, due to the sweeping nature of the changes it introduced it remains synonymous with the regulation of hazardous waste in the United States.  With RCRA, for the first time the generation, transportation, and disposal of hazardous waste came fully under Federal regulations (and state regulations if the state was authorized to manage RCRA) and open dumping of waste was to be banned by 1983.

Like this article?

Subscribe to my Monthly Newsletter

No marketing emails!

Read the EPA Press Release – December 13, 1976.  Broadly speaking RCRA’s goals were and are:

  • To protect human health and the environment from the potential hazards of waste disposal.
  • To conserve energy and natural resources.
  • To reduce the amount of waste generated.
  • To ensure that wastes are managed in an environmentally sound manner.

RCRA is legislation; it is not regulation.  It did however authorize the US EPA (created in 1970) to draft the regulations to realize the goals of RCRA.  Though not the first regulations to come from RCRA, it is the “Hazardous Waste and Consolidated Permit Regulations,” published in the Federal Register on May 19, 1980 (45 FR 33066; May 19, 1980), which established the basic Cradle to Grave approach to hazardous waste management so familiar to all of us today.

“But wait!” You say, “What were the requirements for a hazardous waste generator from December 13, 1976 – when RCRA was signed into law – to May 19, 1980 when the first hazardous waste regulations were published?”  I’m no lawyer, but the best I could determine is that during the period between when RCRA was passed and the regulations were written a generator, TSDF, and/or transporter of hazardous waste need only comply with the regulations in affect at that time:  those created by the the Solid Waste Disposal Act of 1965.  In other words:  “Not much”.  Of course, some states and municipalities had out-paced the US EPA and had their own regulations in place well before the RCRA regulations were codified.  An example of this is the state of California which passed its Hazardous Waste Control Law in 1972.  The HWCL served as a model for RCRA passed four years later and to this day California’s hazardous waste regulations are much more strict and broad than those of the US EPA.

Post-RCRA:Hazardous waste lab pack drums

RCRA has been amended many times since its inception, each resulting in a change to the hazardous waste regulations in the CFR.  Some amendments were additions, clarifications, and corrections of typographical errors.  Others resulted in significant changes to the regulations and affected a large number of the regulated industry.  A full description of these amendments will need to wait for a future article.  In brief, however, amendments to RCRA are as follows:

Used Oil Recycling Act of 1980 – Intended to encourage the recycling of Used Oil by exempting if from regulation as a hazardous waste if certain requirements are met.

Solid Waste Disposal Act Amendments of 1980 – Intended to provide US EPA with greater enforcement authority over illegal dumping of hazardous waste.  It also created a category of large-volume wastes thought to be low-toxicity that were excluded from definition as a hazardous waste and would be categorized as Special Waste.

Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 – These 1984 amendments made the most substantial additions to the program by significantly expanding RCRA’s coverage and requirements for hazardous industrial wastes.

Medical Waste Tracking Act of 1988 – In effect for a limited time (expired in 1991) and for a limited area (4 eastern states and Puerto Rico).  The regulation of medical waste is currently the responsibility of the states.

Federal Facility Compliance Act of 1992  – Strengthened enforcement of RCRA at Federal facilities.

Land Disposal Program Flexibility Act of 1996 – provided regulatory flexibility for land disposal of certain wastes.

Contact me with any questions you may have about the generation, identification, management, and disposal of hazardous waste

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

Read more: http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/encyclopedia/Res-Sec/Resource-Conservation-and-Recovery-Act.html#ixzz2Irh6TYoz

Nothing in this article may cause you to substantially change the way you manage hazardous waste.  However, knowing the history of the regulations can help to form a broad understanding of where we’ve been and – more importantly – where we’re going as a regulated community.  That is why I always include a brief history of US EPA & RCRA in my training.  Whether it’s through legislation, interpretation, or enforcement, RCRA is always changing.  Make sure your training addresses these changes so you can maintain compliance.

Free Stuff From the US EPA – RCRA in Focus

Contrary to what you may believe, the US EPA is not all about enforcement.  Part of US EPA’s mission is to provide information to the regulated community in the form of guidance documents whose purpose is to summarize the regulations in plain English and indicate sources of additional information.

When referring to a guidance document it is important to keep the following in mind:

  • No guidance document – even one published by the US EPA – is a substitute for the regulations.  A good guidance document may only provide an overview of the regulations, if you find some of its information useful you must research the regulations to determine compliance.
  • The regulations may have changed since the guidance document was written.
  • If the document is issued by the US EPA you may have to confirm the information with your state environmental agency.  All states except for Iowa, Alaska, & Puerto Rico have approved hazardous waste programs under RCRA and will write and enforce their own regulations.  These states will have their own guidance documents to explain their regulations.

An example of a series of very helpful guidance documents issued by US EPA is the RCRA in Focus series.  From the website:

RCRA in Focus is a series of publications providing an overview of the RCRA regulations affecting specific industry sectors. Intended as a guide for small businesses, RIF presents the lifecycle of a typical waste for each industry and focuses on recycling and pollution prevention options. Each issue contains a hazardous waste table of RCRA requirements for small businesses and answers frequently asked questions.

Industry for which RCRA in Focus publications are available:

Guidance documents are available for download as a pdf or you may order copies through the mail (limit to ten different publications and one of each per day).

Publications like these can be a great asset in maintaining compliance with the hazardous waste regulations of the US EPA and your state, especially if you are one of the industry listed above.  Also helpful is training.  Contact me for a free consultation on your training needs.