PO Box 1232 Freeport, IL 61032

RCRA

KC Company Pleads Guilty To Illegally Transporting Hazardous Waste

KANSAS CITY, Mo. – Tammy Dickinson, United States Attorney for the Western District of Missouri, announced that a Kansas City, Mo., company pleaded guilty in federal court today to illegally transporting hazardous waste.

Z-Group, LLC, is a Kansas company registered to do business in Missouri. Company president Friedrich-Wilhelm Zschietzschmann represented the company in court today to plead guilty before U.S. District Judge Brian C. Wimes to illegally transporting hazardous waste.

Zschietzschmann was also the president and CEO of Z-International, Inc., which specialized in the labeling industry.  Z-International used large quantities of ink and ink-related products in its business, making labels for numerous companies all over the world.  Z-International was located at 110 East 16th Street, Kansas City, Mo. Z-Group was established in 2001 by Zschietzschmann to serve as owner of real estate where Z-International operated its business.

Z-International was closed by Zschietzschmann in July 2010.  Any assets or fixtures remaining on the property after the business closed were sold or otherwise disposed of by a Z-International employee.

Between July 2010 and April 2012, the company authorized personnel to hire others to transport hazardous waste to a separate location. Z-International employees authorized the transportation of 23 containers of varying sizes that contained liquid hazardous waste to Studer Container Service, 520 Madison Ave., Kansas City, Mo. Studer did not have a permit to receive hazardous waste.

In April 2012, Environmental Protection Agency officials conducted a compliance inspection at Studer.  During the inspection, EPA inspectors found several containers of what appeared to be hazardous materials.

On June 28, 2012, EPA began its sampling and clean-up operation. On Dec. 21, 2012, the EPA National Enforcement Investigations Center provided analytical results for 38 samples collected from the containers dumped at Studer. Five of the samples tested positive for ignitability and two of the samples tested positive for toxicity.

The EPA Superfund Program cleaned up the hazardous waste at Studer to eliminate possible adverse effects on human health and environment. The total EPA Superfund cost was $36,871.

Under the terms of today’s plea agreement, Z-Group must pay a $50,000 fine and $36,871 in restitution, for a total payment of $86,871. The company is also subject to up to five years of probation. A sentencing hearing will be scheduled after the completion of a presentence investigation by the United States Probation Office.

This case is being prosecuted by Assistant U.S. Attorney Jane Pansing Brown. It was investigated by the Environmental Protection Agency, Criminal Investigation Division.

Read the full release here.

The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and the regulations based upon it (both USEPA and State) mandate “cradle-to-grave” responsibility for all hazardous waste.  The RCRA regulations, however, only apply to active hazardous waste sites.  The regulations of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) and its amendments, collectively known as “Superfund”, have the authority to clean up closed or abandoned sites that are contaminated with Hazardous Substances, which is the case here.  Either way, it is the generator of the hazardous waste that will be held responsible for the clean-up costs.

Contact me with questions about disposal options for your hazardous waste and to ensure you receive the best training that will help you to avoid situations such as this.

EPA Proposes Remedy at World Resources Company, Pottsville, Norwegian Township, PA

News Release: Public Information and Availability Session
08/06/2013

 

What:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) will present information and take questions from the community on the proposed remedy for the World Resources Company (WRC) facility, located at 170 Walnut Lane, Pottsville, Pa. 17901. The facility has conducted an investigation and sampling at the site in accordance with the requirements of the federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) Corrective Action Program. Corrective Action is an EPA program designed to guide the investigation, and any cleanup of contaminated hazardous waste.

When:

August 12, 2013 at 7:00 p.m.

Where:

Norwegian Township Building, 506 Maple Avenue, Mar Lin, Pa. 17951-0251

Background:

WRC recycles metal bearing sludges that are generated primarily by metal finishing and electroplating industries. Some of these sludges are considered hazardous waste under EPA and Pennsylvania Law. Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments were conducted at the facility. Five monitoring wells were installed for soil and groundwater. Soil samples were collected. Environmental sampling showed no contaminants above either EPA or PADEP residential standards. WRC continues to do groundwater and soil monitoring approximately twice a year, and has since 1990. No known releases have occurred at the facility resulting in investigation or remedial actions.

Proposed Remedy:

EPA will propose this week that there are no known environmental issues at the property that have not been addressed. EPA’s investigation has found that there is no contamination at the site. The proposed Final Decision is for “no further action” and will be documented in a Statement of Basis and subject to public review and comment.

Public Comment:

Persons wishing to comment on the proposed remedy may do so by submitting their comments to EPA betweenAugust 14 and September 27, 2013. All comments must be submitted in writing via mail, fax, or email to EPA Project Manager Catheryn Blankenbiller, at U.S. EPA Region 3, 1650 Arch Street, Mailcode 3LC30, Philadelphia, Pa. 19103 (Email: blankenbiller.catheryn@epa.gov; Fax: 215-814-3113.  All comments will be considered in making a final decision.

Contact: Donna Heron at 215-814-2665 / heron.donna@epa.gov

It is interesting to note that this situation is being handled by both the State of Pennsylvania DEP and the USEPA under the authority of the Corrective Action program of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and not Superfund.  This is because the site is still active.  If it were an abandoned site or one where ownership could not be determined, then the determination of contamination and potential clean-up would be undertaken with the authority of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA, aka:  Superfund) and not RCRA.

Please don’t hesitate to contact me if you have questions about the regulations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) for the USEPA or your State.

The Management of Hazardous Waste Generated Off-Shore

The regulations of the the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) apply generally to any hazardous waste generated, transported, treated, stored, or disposed of within the US.  But what of a hazardous waste generated in waters off the coast of the US, perhaps on a vessel or an oil platform or rig?  The purpose of this article is to explain the applicability of the hazardous waste regulations of the USEPA and the HazMat Transportation regulations of the USDOT/PHMSA to the generation and transportation of hazardous waste within and without US territorial waters. (more…)

The History of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

In the beginning…there was unregulated disposal of waste generated by commercial and industrial facilities, both public and private.  Today there are the hazardous waste regulations written and enforced by the US Environmental Protection Agency and individual states if they have an approved hazardous waste program.  So, what was life like for what we now refer to as the “Regulated Community” before there were regulations?  Pretty simple for them, but not so good for the environment. Get ready for a history of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act.

A common industry practice in those days was to dispose of hazardous waste onsite by burying, burning, or indefinite storage or have it shipped offsite for something similar.  In either case records were not required nor kept.  Not only did this cause damage to the environment, but the lack of recordkeeping made it impossible for property owners to know what, if any, pollutants were on their property due to past activities.

One cause of this pollution is a flaw in capitalism – a system I love – known as the Tragedy of the Commons.  Basically the cost for damage to the environment caused by a polluter were borne by all instead of just the polluter.  Thus an incentive for polluters to dispose of waste in the cheapest and the least environmentally-friendly manner possible:  open dumping.

Another cause was that the regulation of waste was not thought to be the responsibility of the Federal government and was left to state and local government.  This resulted in an inconsistent patchwork of regulations throughout the country.  The inter-state transportation of hazardous waste, not to mention the ability of pollutants to cross borders on their own, made effective regulation impossible.

A factor that exacerbated the situation was the increase in the volume and toxicity of waste generated starting in the 1960’s.  Note the following statistics from 25 Years of RCRA:  Building on our Past to Protect our Future:

  • In the decade between 1950 and 1960, the amount of trash individuals created increased 60 percent.
  • In 1965, more than four million chemicals were being produced in the U.S. and synthetic chemical manufacturing
    was on the rise.

By the 1960’s it was clear that something had to change.

This resulted in the 1965 passage of the Solid Waste Disposal Act (SWDA).  The SWDA did not emphasize the regulation of waste throughout its lifecycle, but instead focused on training and research as a means to identify methods to manage waste.  It did, however, set minimum standards for local landfills.  It had little to no effect on generators of hazardous waste.

The SWDA was amended in 1970 by the Resource Recovery Act (RRA).  The RRA emphasized the recovery of energy and materials from solid waste over disposal.  Even with this amendment the regulations were still nothing like we know them today.  For example:  open dumping of waste was not yet banned, companies did not have “Cradle to Grave” responsibility for the hazardous waste they generated, and there was no permit program for hazardous waste generators, transporters, or disposal facilities.

All of that changed in 1976 with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) which was merely an amendment to the SWDA of 1965, and has been amended itself many times since.  However, due to the sweeping nature of the changes it introduced it remains synonymous with the regulation of hazardous waste in the United States.  With RCRA, for the first time the generation, transportation, and disposal of hazardous waste came fully under Federal regulations (and state regulations if the state was authorized to manage RCRA) and open dumping of waste was to be banned by 1983.

Like this article?

Subscribe to my Monthly Newsletter

No marketing emails!

Read the EPA Press Release – December 13, 1976.  Broadly speaking RCRA’s goals were and are:

  • To protect human health and the environment from the potential hazards of waste disposal.
  • To conserve energy and natural resources.
  • To reduce the amount of waste generated.
  • To ensure that wastes are managed in an environmentally sound manner.

RCRA is legislation; it is not regulation.  It did however authorize the US EPA (created in 1970) to draft the regulations to realize the goals of RCRA.  Though not the first regulations to come from RCRA, it is the “Hazardous Waste and Consolidated Permit Regulations,” published in the Federal Register on May 19, 1980 (45 FR 33066; May 19, 1980), which established the basic Cradle to Grave approach to hazardous waste management so familiar to all of us today.

“But wait!” You say, “What were the requirements for a hazardous waste generator from December 13, 1976 – when RCRA was signed into law – to May 19, 1980 when the first hazardous waste regulations were published?”  I’m no lawyer, but the best I could determine is that during the period between when RCRA was passed and the regulations were written a generator, TSDF, and/or transporter of hazardous waste need only comply with the regulations in affect at that time:  those created by the the Solid Waste Disposal Act of 1965.  In other words:  “Not much”.  Of course, some states and municipalities had out-paced the US EPA and had their own regulations in place well before the RCRA regulations were codified.  An example of this is the state of California which passed its Hazardous Waste Control Law in 1972.  The HWCL served as a model for RCRA passed four years later and to this day California’s hazardous waste regulations are much more strict and broad than those of the US EPA.

Post-RCRA:Hazardous waste lab pack drums

RCRA has been amended many times since its inception, each resulting in a change to the hazardous waste regulations in the CFR.  Some amendments were additions, clarifications, and corrections of typographical errors.  Others resulted in significant changes to the regulations and affected a large number of the regulated industry.  A full description of these amendments will need to wait for a future article.  In brief, however, amendments to RCRA are as follows:

Used Oil Recycling Act of 1980 – Intended to encourage the recycling of Used Oil by exempting if from regulation as a hazardous waste if certain requirements are met.

Solid Waste Disposal Act Amendments of 1980 – Intended to provide US EPA with greater enforcement authority over illegal dumping of hazardous waste.  It also created a category of large-volume wastes thought to be low-toxicity that were excluded from definition as a hazardous waste and would be categorized as Special Waste.

Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 – These 1984 amendments made the most substantial additions to the program by significantly expanding RCRA’s coverage and requirements for hazardous industrial wastes.

Medical Waste Tracking Act of 1988 – In effect for a limited time (expired in 1991) and for a limited area (4 eastern states and Puerto Rico).  The regulation of medical waste is currently the responsibility of the states.

Federal Facility Compliance Act of 1992  – Strengthened enforcement of RCRA at Federal facilities.

Land Disposal Program Flexibility Act of 1996 – provided regulatory flexibility for land disposal of certain wastes.

Contact me with any questions you may have about the generation, identification, management, and disposal of hazardous waste

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://danielstraining.com/

Read more: http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/encyclopedia/Res-Sec/Resource-Conservation-and-Recovery-Act.html#ixzz2Irh6TYoz

Nothing in this article may cause you to substantially change the way you manage hazardous waste.  However, knowing the history of the regulations can help to form a broad understanding of where we’ve been and – more importantly – where we’re going as a regulated community.  That is why I always include a brief history of US EPA & RCRA in my training.  Whether it’s through legislation, interpretation, or enforcement, RCRA is always changing.  Make sure your training addresses these changes so you can maintain compliance.

Free Stuff From the US EPA – RCRA in Focus

Contrary to what you may believe, the US EPA is not all about enforcement.  Part of US EPA’s mission is to provide information to the regulated community in the form of guidance documents whose purpose is to summarize the regulations in plain English and indicate sources of additional information.

When referring to a guidance document it is important to keep the following in mind:

  • No guidance document – even one published by the US EPA – is a substitute for the regulations.  A good guidance document may only provide an overview of the regulations, if you find some of its information useful you must research the regulations to determine compliance.
  • The regulations may have changed since the guidance document was written.
  • If the document is issued by the US EPA you may have to confirm the information with your state environmental agency.  All states except for Iowa, Alaska, & Puerto Rico have approved hazardous waste programs under RCRA and will write and enforce their own regulations.  These states will have their own guidance documents to explain their regulations.

An example of a series of very helpful guidance documents issued by US EPA is the RCRA in Focus series.  From the website:

RCRA in Focus is a series of publications providing an overview of the RCRA regulations affecting specific industry sectors. Intended as a guide for small businesses, RIF presents the lifecycle of a typical waste for each industry and focuses on recycling and pollution prevention options. Each issue contains a hazardous waste table of RCRA requirements for small businesses and answers frequently asked questions.

Industry for which RCRA in Focus publications are available:

Guidance documents are available for download as a pdf or you may order copies through the mail (limit to ten different publications and one of each per day).

Publications like these can be a great asset in maintaining compliance with the hazardous waste regulations of the US EPA and your state, especially if you are one of the industry listed above.  Also helpful is training.  Contact me for a free consultation on your training needs.

Search Website