rail

Safe Transportation of Energy Products (STEP) by USDOT/PHMSA

In response to recent accidents involving crude oil shipments by rail in the U.S. and Canada, U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx has issued a “Call to Action,” calling on rail company executives, associations, shippers, and others to discuss how stakeholders can prevent or mitigate the consequences of rail accidents that involve flammable liquids.

Bakken Crude Oil by Rail

Railroad Tank Cars of Bakken Crude Oil passing through Illinois

The following companies have voluntarily submitted testing data to the US Department of Transportation in response. The information shared consists of data gathered from samples of petroleum crude oil from the Bakken region of North Dakota. We will continue to post updates as more companies respond to the Department’s industry-wide effort aimed at enhancing the safe transport of flammable liquids by rail.

Company Name Date Received Number of Samples Notes
WPX Energy 5/29/2014 16 Tested for RVP, FP, BP, API, chemical breakdown of light ends, benzene content.
EOG Resources 5/27/2014 35 Tested for RVP, FP, BP, H2S.
North Dakota
Petroleum Council
5/17/2014 152 Tested for RVP, FP, BP, API Specific Gravity, chemical breakdown of light ends, H2S.
American Fuel &
Petrochemical
Manufacturers
5/14/2014 1,400 Tested for RVP, FP, BP, rail tank car pressure, chemical breakdown of light ends, H2S, corrosivity.
Statoil & Gas 5/13/2014 43 Tested for RVP, FP, BP, API Specific Gravity, sulfur content, H2S.
Phillips 66 5/09/2014 16 Tested for FP, BP, API Specific Gravity, sulfur content, sediment & water content, TVP, RVP, H2S, chemical breakdown of light ends.
Great Northern Midstream 5/08/2014 10 Tested for FP, BP, H2S, chemical breakdown of light ends, Benzene.
ExxonMobil 4/17/2014 15 Tested for density, H2S, FP, BP, RVP and chemical breakdown of light ends, benzene content.
Continental Resources 3/18/2014 1 Tested for API Specific Gravity, sulfur content, RVP, ethane, propane and butane.
Plains All American 3/11/2014 24 Tested for FP, BP, API Specific Gravity, sulfur content, RVP.
Savage 2/28/2014 12 Tested for FP, BP, RVP, and sulfur content.

Notes:

  • H2S = Hydrogen Sulfide; BP = Boiling Point
  • FP = Flash Point
  • RVP = Reid Vapor Pressure
  • API = American Petroleum Institute
  • TVP = True Vapor Pressure

Contact me with any questions you may have about the transportation of hazardous materials by air, highway, vessel, or rail

International and Domestic

Daniels Training Services

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

Train Spilled 12,000 Gallons of Oil Across Minnesota

UPDATE 2/6/2014 2:45 PM ET: According to MPCA spokeswoman Cathy Rofshus, “The MPCA directed the railroad to begin cleanup actions Feb. 6, starting in Winona, where there is more oil in the snow between the tracks because the train had slowed. This cleanup is still underway today. Other areas of spillage are far less oiled and cleanup is not feasible — AT THIS TIME — for considerable lengths of the track. However, these areas will continue to be monitored and reassessed through the thaw and additional cleanup done if necessary.” The headline of this piece has been adjusted accordingly.

An oil train sprung a leak while traveling through southeastern Minnesota Monday, dribbling 12,000 gallons of crude oil over a 68-mile stretch of track. The spill was relatively small, but because of the way it spread, officials at the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency said they won’t be able to clean it up.

“It’s like it spray-painted oil,” MPCA spokeswoman Cathy Rofshus explained. She added that the amount leaked was about half the oil contained in a single tanker car. It was nothing, in other words, like the 1.5 million gallon spill that occurred when a train derailed in Lac-Mégantic, Quebec, this past July, killing 47 people.

And it was but a small contribution to the increasing amount of oil being spilled from trains in general: including over 1.15 million gallons in 2013, more than the combined amount spilled over the past four decades of federal record-keeping. Such “mishaps,” according to Bloomberg News, are more likely to occur on trains, while the amount spilled by pipelines, when leaks do occur, tends to be much greater.

Two questions need to be answered about the above incident:
  1. Is the oil being transported by rail a hazardous material as defined by the USDOT?  Refer to the definition at 49 CFR 171.8 for an answer.
  2. If it is a hazardous material, then did the carrier inspect all the rail cars prior to accepting them for transportation as is required by 49 CFR 174.9(a), which reads:

At each location where a hazardous material is accepted for transportation or placed in a train, the carrier must inspect each rail car containing the hazardous material, at ground level, for required markings, labels, placards, securement of closures, and leakage. These inspections may be performed in conjunction with inspections required under parts 215 and 232 of this title.

Daniels Training Services

815.821.1550/Info@DanielsTraining.com/www.DanielsTraining.com

If you are involved in any stage of the transportation of a hazardous material as a Shipper (0r Offeror), a Carrier, or as the destination facility (receiver) you must comply with the Hazardous Material Regulations of the PHMSA/USDOT which includes a requirement to provide triennial training for all HazMat Employees.  Don’t hesitate to contact me for HazMat Employee Training, RCRA Hazardous Waste Training or any questions about your training needs.

New Requirements and Recommendations from the FRA & PHMSA to Prevent Unintended Movement of HazMat Rail Cars

In a response to the July 6, 2013 train derailment in Lac-Mégantic, Quebec, Canada, and before the investigation into the crash is complete, on  August 2nd the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) of the USDOT announced its intent to prevent similar accidents caused by trains operating on mainline tracks or sidings from moving unintentionally. (more…)