PHMSA

US DOT Requirements for the Shipment of Empty HazMat Packagings

US DOT Requirements for the Shipment of Empty HazMat Packagings

It’s quite likely that at one time or another you have had to deal with the off-site shipment of empty packagings.  Most manufacturing facilities experience this when they empty various non-bulk (usually 55-gallons or smaller) packagings of their contents and then either return them to the supplier or send to them to a facility for reconditioning, remanufacture, or reuse.   If these packagings contained a hazardous material as defined by US DOT, then the shipment is subject to the requirements of the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR).  However, the HMR includes an exception from full regulation if the provisions of 49 CFR 173.29 are met.  Whatever your situation, a good understanding of the provisions and exclusions for shipment of empty packagings will help ensure you maintain compliance with US DOT regulations.

You must first understand that an empty packaging containing only the residue of its original hazardous material contents is subject to the same requirements of the HMR as it was when it contained a greater quantity (i.e. when it was full).  This includes use of the four hazard communication methods:  shipping papers, placards, labels, and markings; and the training required in 49 CFR 172, Subpart H for the HazMat Employees who prepare the empty packagings for shipment.  The two most useful exclusions in 49 CFR 173.29 can be found in paragraphs (b) & (c) and are explained below.  While paragraph (b) excludes the shipment from all of the HMR, it also contains the most restrictive provisions to gain that exclusion.  Paragraph c excludes the shipper from only some of the HMR, but is much easier to comply with.

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

A close reading of 49 CFR 173.29(b) reveals that your empty packaging shipment – bulk and non-bulk – is not subject to any requirement of the HMR if you are able to meet all of the following provisions, as applicable:

First, any hazard communication method that identifies the empty packaging as containing a hazarous material (i.e. marking, labels, placards, etc.) are removed, obliterated, or securely covered in transportation.  Note that the requirement to remove all hazard communication is not necessary if the packagings are shipped in a transport vehicle or freight container, are not visible in transportation, and are loaded by you – the shipper – and unloaded by you or the consignee – the destination facility.

Second, the empty packaging is either unused, sufficiently cleaned of residue and purged of vapors to remove any potential hazard, or is refilled with a non-hazardous material such that any residue now won’t pose a threat.  Note that “cleaned of residue and purged…” and “now won’t pose a threat” is intentionally not defined by regulation.  It is your responsibility as the shipper to ensure these provisions are met.

Third, if the empty packaging contains only the residue of an ORM-D Consumer Commodity,  a Division 2.2 non-flammable gas described in 49 CFR 173.29(b)(2)(iv)(B), or the residue does not meet the definition of a hazardous substance, a hazardous waste, or a marine pollutant.  An example of where this last provision might apply is if a shipment is regulated as a hazardous material solely due to it being above the RQ in a single packaging and thus a hazardous substance.  If the amount of material in an empty container is below the RQ, then the material is no longer a hazardous substance and no longer subject to the HMR (02-0100).

So in conclusion, 49 CFR 173.29(b) allows you to ship packagings – both bulk and non-bulk – without any of the requirements of the HMR as long as all the hazards are removed – or not judged to be much of a hazard in the first place, such as ORM-D – and any information identifying the packaging as hazardous are removed or not visible in transportation.

49 CFR 173.29(c), while not as extensive in the exclusions from the HMR as is paragraph (b), also does not contain as many hoops to jump through.  It is most likely the applicable regulation if you ship empty non-bulk packagings to a drum re-conditioner or back to the material supplier.  There are three provisions or which you must be aware.

First, it must be a non-bulk packaging as defined at 49 CFR 171.8 which is a HazMat packaging that is:

  • ≤119 gallon capacity for a liquid.
  • ≤119 gallon and ≤882 pound capacity for a solid.
  • ≤1,000 gallon water capacity for a gas.

Read: Bulk Packaging Explained!

Second, the residue in the empty packaging may only be a hazardous material covered by Table 2 of 49 CFR 172.504 (see below) and is not a Poison Inhalation Hazard.

Table 2

Hazard Class or Division Placard Name
1.4 EXPLOSIVES 1.4
1.5 EXPLOSIVES 1.5
1.6 EXPLOSIVES 1.6
2.1 FLAMMABLE GAS
2.2 NON-FLAMMABLE GAS
3 FLAMMABLE
Combustible Liquid COMBUSTIBLE
4.1 FLAMMABLE SOLID
4.2 SPONTANEOUSLY COMBUSTIBLE
5.1 OXIDIZER
5.2 (Other than organic peroxide, Type B, liquid or solid, temperature controlled) ORGANIC PEROXIDE
6.1 (Other than material poisonous by inhalation) POISON
6.2 (Infectious Substance) NONE
8 CORROSIVE
9 CLASS 9 (placard not required for domestic transportation)
ORM-D NONE

If the two above provisions are met for your shipment, then it is not subject to the placarding requirements of 49 CFR 172, Subpart F.

Further, if your shipment of non-bulk packages from Table 2 is transported by a contract or private carrier – not a common carrier – and is destined for reconditioning, remanufacture, or reuse, then you are not required to use a shipping paper as is required for most HazMat shipments per 49 CFR 172, Subpart C (00-0340).  For an explanation of these terms – contract, private, and common carrier – please refer to this guidance letter from USDOT/PHMSA (02-0259).

If required, 49 CFR 173.29(e) refers you to the regulations pertaining to shipping papers found at 49 CFR 172.203(e).  For most shipments – bulk and non-bulk – the description on the shipping paper may include, “RESIDUE: Last Contained…” near the basic description of the hazardous material.  For shipments in a tank car only, which is included in the definition at 49 CFR 171.8 of a railroad car, the description on the shipping paper must include, “RESIDUE: LAST CONTAINED…” before the basic description.

Note that 49 CFR 173.29(c) does not exclude the requirement to train your HazMat Employees per 49 CFR 172, Subpart H.  Therefore any employee that prepares the empty packagings for shipment, completes or signs the shipping papers, or loads/unloads the empty packagings onto the vehicle must receive DOT Hazardous Materials Training.

You must also ensure compliance with the US EPA regulations for emptying the container (US EPA refers to it as a container, not a packaging) in order to ensure the residue is no longer a hazardous waste.  The applicable US EPA regulations can be found at 40 CFR 261.7.  If you generate any hazardous waste, you may be subject to the training requirements of 40 CFR 265.16 for any employees who handle hazardous waste or sign a hazardous waste manifest.

Read: The “RCRA Empty” Exemption from Hazardous Waste Regulation

Contact me with any questions you may have about the transportation of hazardous materials by air, highway, vessel, or rail

International and Domestic

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

If you are a shipper of empty packagings, then it is quite likely that you and perhaps several of your employees require triennial HazMat Employee training as required by the US DOT and annual RCRA Employee training per US EPA.

The Materials of Trade Exception for the Transportation of Hazardous Materials

The Materials of Trade Exception for the Transportation of Hazardous Materials

As a shipper of hazardous materials, you are likely comfortable with routine HazMat shipments:

  1. Offer a hazardous material for transportation to a carrier.
  2. Carrier transports HazMat to destination.
  3. HazMat received at destination.

Sometimes, however, you’re faced with a non-routine situation:  you or an employee must transport a hazardous material by motor vehicle over a public roadway.  The need is not limited to, but may include, any one of the following:

  • A ‘sister’ facility requires a small amount of product or raw material from your location.
  • You are required to transport a sample of some material to an off-site location for analysis.
  • You must deliver a product to a customer.
  • A hazardous material is necessary to provide a service to a customer at their location.
  • A hazardous material is necessary to conduct a maintenance service activity at an off-site location.

In any of these situations your concern may be that as a shipper of hazardous materials (one who offers hazardous materials for transportation) you are not allowed to perform the role of a carrier (one who transports hazardous materials in commerce).  You may not be aware that the Hazardous Materials Regulations contain an option for shippers of HazMat in this situation.  Known as the Materials of Trade Exception and codified at 49 CFR 173.6, it was created to simplify the transportation of…

  • Certain hazardous materials…
  • In small quantities…
  • By motor vehicle over a public roadway.
Continue reading to see if the Materials of Trade Exception may be of use to you. (more…)

Use of the Technical Name with the Proper Shipping Name When Shipping HazMat

When determining a proper shipping name for your hazardous materials shipment it is important to select from the Hazardous Materials Table at 49 CFR 172.101 the most specific name that best describes the hazardous material to be shipped.  Proper shipping names should be selected in the following order:

  1. The chemical identity of the hazardous material:  its technical name.
  2. The name of a category or group of chemicals, e.g. “Alcohols, n.o.s.”
  3. The intended use of the material, e.g. “Resin Solution”.
  4. It describes the hazard(s) of the material, e.g. “Flammable Liquid, n.o.s.”

It is when the fourth option of the above is chosen that you must pay special attention to column 1 of the Hazardous Materials Table and see if the letter ‘G’ appears there.  The ‘G’ stands for Generic and means that the proper shipping name selected does not go far enough to describe the hazards of the material it represents.  It is necessary therefore to include the technical name of the hazardous material on the shipping paper.  Technical Name is defined at 49 CFR 171.8 and means a recognized chemical name used by science.  It does not allow for the use of trade names.

The regulations at 49 CFR 172.203(k) indicate the correct use of the technical name on the shipping paper; please continue for a summary of this information.

If the material is not a mixture or solution, than you need use only one technical name.  It must appear in parenthesis and be associated with the basic description.  It may appear thus:

“Corrosive liquid, n.o.s., (Octanoyl chloride), 8, UN 1760, II”, or

“Corrosive liquid, n.o.s., 8, UN 1760, II (contains Octanoyl chloride)”

Note that the use of the word “contains” is allowed, but not required.

If the hazardous material is a mixture or solution of two or more hazardous materials, then the technical names ofat least two hazardous components that contribute the most to the hazards of the material must be listed on the shipping paper as indicated above.  Note that you are required to list “at least two” of the most dangerous constituents, but no upper limit is set.  You may therefore list as many hazardous ingredients as you wish as long as the first two listed are the major contributors to the hazards of the material.  Also note that you are only required to list the hazardous constituents.  If you have a mixture of a hazardous material and non-HazMat, you are not required to list the non-HazMat.

Many people equate the presence of the “n.o.s.” (“not otherwise specified”) at the end of the proper shipping name to be synonymous in meaning with a ‘G’ in column 1, but this is not so.  There are several proper shipping names with “n.o.s.” – such as “Alcohols, n.o.s.” that lack a ‘G’ in column 1.  The regulations at 49 CFR 172.203(k) are clear that the technical name is required on a shipping paper only when a ‘G’ is found in column 1.

For organic peroxides which may qualify for more than one generic listing depending on concentration, the technical name must include the actual concentration being shipped or the concentration range for the appropriate generic listing.

Shipping descriptions for toxic materials that meet the criteria of Division 6.1, PG I or II (Poisonous Material) or Division 2.3 (Poisonous Gas) and are identified by the letter “G” in column 1 of the §172.101 Table, must have the technical name of the toxic constituent entered in parentheses in association with the basic description.

There are some situations where the use of a technical name is not required even if a “G” appears in column 1 of the Hazardous Materials Table.  If a material is a hazardous waste and is described using the proper shipping name of Hazardous waste, solid, n.o.s. or Hazardous waste, liquid, n.o.s. (class 9) it need not include the technical name provided the US EPA hazardous waste code is included near the basic description the same as the requirement for the technical name.  Or, if the material is a reportable quantity of a hazardous substance, you may describe it as required in 49 CFR 172.203(c) instead.

A technical name is also not required if you are shipping a sample of a material for analysis and the hazard class is not known.  Read my article about the US EPA and US DOT requirements for managing samples of hazardous materials.

49 CFR 172.203(k)(2)(iii-iv) allow for a relaxation of the requirement for a technical name in certain rare situations where the proper shipping name – though containing “n.o.s.” – is descriptive enough of the hazards of the material.  I suggest you read these two specific regulations to see if they apply to your operations.

Another exception for the use of the technical name can be found at 49 CFR 173.12 and applies solely to shipments of hazardous waste in lab packs.  I don’t have time to explain lab packs here, but suffice to say that as long as your lab pack shipment of hazardous waste meets the requirements of 49 CFR 173.12(b), then pursuant to 49 CFR 173.12(d) you need not include the technical name on the shipping paper or as a marking on the package.

All of the above is required to appear on the shipping papers, what about on the packaging as a marking?  49 CFR 172.301(b) specifies the requirements for including the technical name on a non-bulk packaging (<119 gallons) as the same as those required on a shipping paper.  Therefore the appearance of the technical name on the shipping paper should match its appearance on the packaging as a marking for non-bulk packages.

49 CFR 172.302 – General Marking Requirements for Bulk Packagings does not include a requirement for the proper shipping name on a bulk packaging unless it is a portable tank or a railroad tank car.  Therefore, the technical name is not required for bulk packagings except in the case of a portable tank or a railroad tank car.

Questions like these come up frequently at the HazMat Courses I hold nationwide and year-round.  My training events meet the regulatory requirements of the US EPA for RCRA training and those of the US DOT for HazMat Employees.  Both together in one day of training.  Please refer to my Schedule of Events to find a training event date and location convenient to you.  Or, contact me directly to schedule on-site training for all of your Hazardous Waste Personnel and HazMat Employees in one day of training for only $1,749.

Selecting a Carrier for Your Shipment of Hazardous Materials

I have the opportunity during my weekly nationwide training events to meet with a variety of HazMat Employers  who usually are also Shippers, since they “offer for shipment” a hazardous material to a Carrier who then transports it in commerce.  For most persons, their experience as a Shipper of hazardous materials is limited to their routine shipments of hazardous waste.  For this purpose they commonly rely on the hazardous waste disposal firm or TSDF to provide for off-site transportation of the waste.

Sometimes however, a person is faced with the responsibility of arranging for a non-typical HazMat shipment.  In this situation you will need to select a Carrier that can transport the hazardous material to its destination.  It is important to select a Carrier who meets the requirements of both the Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) and the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA).  Both of these are administrations within the US Department of Transportation and require a brief explanation.

PHMSA was created in 2005 to replace the Research and Special Provisions Administration (RSPA).  It is used by US DOT to develop and enforce regulations to ensure the safe transportation of hazardous materials (HazMat) in commerce by air, water, highway, rail, and all transportation by pipeline.

FMCSA was formed January 1, 2000 to regulate the trucking industry in the US.  Its regulations apply to employees and employers who transport HazMat – and non-HazMat – in commerce on public highways.

Whether it is a routine shipment of your hazardous waste that you have shipped a thousand times before, or a one-time or first-time shipment, you as the Shipper must ensure the Carrier you select is in compliance with all applicable regulations of the PHMSA and FMCSA.  Before you offer a hazardous material for shipment, confirm the following with your Carrier:

  1. Has the driver received training as a HazMat Employee per the requirements of 49 CFR 172, Subpart H within the last three years?  All HazMat Employees must receive the following training:
    1. General Awareness/Familiarization
    2. Function Specific
    3. Safety Procedures/Emergency Response
    4. Security Awareness
    5. In-Depth Security (if applicable, see here for more information)

In addition to the above, a person who transports hazardous materials over a public roadway must receive Driver Training.

  1. If the shipment is required to be placarded per the requirements of 49 CFR 172, Subpart F or otherwise meets the applicability requirements of 49 CFR 107.601; is the Carrier registered as a transporter of hazardous materials per the requirements of 49 CFR 107.608?  Click here for a short survey to determine the registration requirements.
  2. If the shipment meets the applicability requirements of 49 CFR 172.800(b) – Revised effective October 1, 2010 – does the Carrier have a DOT Security Plan and conduct In-Depth Security Training for its HazMat Employees per 49 CFR 172, subpart H?
  3. If the shipment is  required to be placarded per the requirements of 49 CFR 172, Subpart F; does the driver have the hazardous materials endorsement on their Commercial Driver’s License (CDL) per their respective state to the minimum standards mandated in 49 CFR 383, Subparts G & H?
  4. If the shipment meets the applicability requirements of 49 CFR 385.403; does the Carrier have a Hazardous Materials Safety Permit (HMSP)? A Carrier may take the following survey to determine if it is required to obtain an HMSP.  A Shipper may find this survey useful as well.

The selection of your Carrier is only the first of many of your responsibilities as a Shipper of hazardous materials.  You’re responsibilities include:

  • Determining the Proper Shipping Name, Hazard Class and/or Division, Identification Number, and packing group.
  • Select the proper packaging.
  • Affix the proper hazard class labels and markings.
  • Properly complete the shipping paper, including the…
    • Emergency response information
    • Emergency response phone number
    • Certification statement and signature
    • Provide correct placards to the driver.
    • Completion of a DOT Security Plan.  Take this simple survey to see if the DOT Security Regulations apply to you.
    • TRAINING FOR ALL OF YOUR HAZMAT EMPLOYEES.

Everything you need to know as a Shipper is covered in the afternoon session of my one-day, nationwide training events.  It also fulfills the US DOT triennial training requirements for HazMat Employees.  The remaining 4-hours cover the Hazardous Waste Personnel training requirements of the US EPA and provides a wealth of information for generators of hazardous waste.

Use of Commas in the Proper Shipping Description for Hazardous Materials

A question from an attendee of one of my recent training events forced me to re-think my strongly-held belief in the correct formatting of the proper shipping description for a hazardous materials shipment.  The question asked was, “Is a comma required between the primary hazard class (3 in the example below) and the subsidiary hazard class (8 in the example)?  Or, what if there is more than one subsidiary hazard class, must there be a comma between them?”

As a truck driver for Laidlaw Environmental Services for several years and ~13 years with Fehr-Graham and Associates (click here for more information), I have seen my share of shipping papers and thought I knew the correct answer.  I believed that a comma must appear between every distinct entry in the proper shipping description.

For example: UN2924, Flammable Liquid, Corrosive, n.o.s., 3, (8), PGII, (Isopropanol, Organic Amines).

Research brought me to 49 CFR 172, Subpart C which documents the requirements for completing a shipping paper if required for a shipment of hazardous materials (all hazardous waste shipments from Large Quantity Generators and Small Quantity Generators of hazardous waste are required to use a Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest which is a type of shipping paper).  It does not however indicate specifically when – or if – commas are to be used.  49 CFR 172.202(a)(7)(b) of Subpart C reads, “Except as provided in this subpart, the basic description specified in paragraphs (a)(1), (2), (3) and (4) of this section must be shown in sequence with no additional information interspersed. For example, ‘UN2744, Cyclobutyl chloroformate, 6.1, (8, 3), PG II’.”   This would seem to indicate that the preferred method, as indicated by the example, is to use commas to separate each distinct part of the basic description.  However…

In the PHMSA webpage of FAQ’s,  in a question regarding the order of information in the basic description the comma is not present between the primary hazard class and the subsidiary hazard classes.  This would seem to indicate that the use of commas is arbitrary.  And….

The Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA) Hotline reported that they have no set formatfor separating the information contained in the basic description or what may be included as “additional description”.

Also, PHMSA written interpretation #05-0180 – while directly addressing another aspect of the basic description – includes the following statement, “The basic shipping description must be easily recognizable and available to emergency responders in the event of an incident.”

This brings us all the way back to the basic function of all four of the DOT hazard communication methods (shipping papers, placards, hazard labels, & markings):  it’s all about communication; and not mindless adherence to the Hazardous Materials Regulations.   The purpose of the proper shipping description on the shipping paper is to communicate the potential hazards of the hazardous material in transportation for all who may come in to contact with it, but especially for emergency responders.  Therefore, as long as the proper sequence of the proper shipping  description is maintained as per 49 CFR 172.202(a)(7)(b) – see example above – and the necessary information is communicated, a shipper may use commas, multiple spaces, hyphens, semi-colons, etc. in the proper shipping description as they see fit. So, the above example may appear correctly as it is, or as any of the following:

UN2924   Flammable Liquid, Corrosive, n.o.s.   3   (8)   PGII   (Isopropanol, Organic Amines)

UN2924 – Flammable Liquid, Corrosive, n.o.s. – 3 – (8) – PGII – (Isopropanol, Organic Amines)

UN2924; Flammable Liquid, Corrosive, n.o.s.; 3  (8); PGII  (Isopropanol, Organic Amines)

In addition, per 49 CFR 172.101(c)(2) punctuation marks and words in italics are not part of the proper shipping name, but may be used.  So, commas are not even required within the proper shipping name, meaning any of the following proper shipping descriptions are acceptable as well:

UN2924   Flammable Liquid Corrosive n.o.s.   3   (8)   PGII   (Isopropanol, Organic Amines)

UN2924 – Flammable Liquid Corrosive n.o.s. – 3 – (8) – PGII – (Isopropanol, Organic Amines)

UN2924; Flammable Liquid Corrosive n.o.s.; 3  (8); PGII  (Isopropanol, Organic Amines)

Researching this question served as a good reminder for me that no part of the HMR – even a comma – is so small it’s unimportant.