Q&A: Is a 55-gallon drum that weighs more than 882 pounds a bulk packaging?

Q&A: Is a 55-gallon drum that weighs more than 882 pounds a bulk packaging?

Q&A: Is a 55-gallon drum that weighs more than 882 pounds a bulk packaging?

Question:

If I have a single 55 gallon drum that weighs over 882 lb is it considered a bulk Wait! Stop! That question contains a false premise. I can’t consider the next question until I explain a bulk packaging and the limits on the maximum net mass of a 55-gallon  drum. The next question will have to wait for another article.

Answer:

Thank you for contacting me. Please allow me to provide some clarification on the term “bulk packaging”.

  • A bulk packaging is defined at 49 CFR 171.8 in the Hazardous Materials Regulations (HMR).
  • It reads in part:

…a bulk packaging has: * * *

(1) A maximum capacity greater than 450 L (119 gallons) as a receptacle for a liquid;

(2) A maximum net mass greater than 400 kg (882 pounds) and a maximum capacity greater than 450 L (119 gallons) as a receptacle for a solid; or

(3) A water capacity greater than 454 kg (1000 pounds) as a receptacle for a gas as defined in §173.115 of this subchapter.

emphasis added.

Read: Bulk Packaging for HazMat Explained!

  • You do not state whether the HazMat in the drum is a liquid or solid – I presume it is not a gas – but, regardless, the maximum capacity of a bulk packaging must be greater than 450 L (119 gallons) for both a liquid and a solid HazMat.
  • It is interesting to note that a bulk packaging for a solid must have a maximum net mass of greater than 400 kg (882 lb) AND a maximum capacity greater than 450 L (119 gallons).
  • You indicate it is a 55-gallon drum. Therefore, its maximum capacity is 208 L. This can’t be a bulk packaging.
  • You also write it weighs more than 882 lb (400 kg). Since this is the gross mass (weight of packaging and HazMat), I will presume the net mass (weight of the HazMat only) is also greater than 400 kg (882 lb); regardless, this is not enough to meet the criteria of a bulk packaging. *It is – in fact – a violation of the packagings specification and will be addressed later*

In sum: What you describe is a non-bulk packaging because its maximum capacity is well below the threshold required for a bulk packaging.55-gallon drum of hazardous waste

Contact me with any questions you may have about the transportation of hazardous materials by air, highway, vessel, or rail

International and Domestic

Now, how about that 55-gallon drum weighing more than 882 pounds?
  • A 55-gallon drum used for the transportation of a HazMat must be designed, manufactured, tested, & marked to meet a specification acceptable to USDOT/PHMSA.
  • I presume the specification in use here, as in most transport of HazMat in non-bulk packagings and IBCs, is the United Nations Performance-Oriented Packaging Standards (aka: UN Standard). The requirements for this specification are found at 49 CFR 178, subpart L.
  • These regulations specify limits on the maximum capacity of all drums made to the UN standard; they are:

Drum TypeMaximum CapacityMaximum Net Mass
Steel drums450 L (119 gallons)400 kg (882 pounds)
Aluminum drums450 L (119 gallons)400 kg (882 pounds)
Metal drums other than steel or aluminum450 L (119 gallons)400 kg (882 pounds)
Plywood drums250 L (66 gallons)400 kg (882 pounds)
Fiber drums450 L (119 gallons)400 kg (882 pounds)
Plastic drums450 L (119 gallons)400 kg (882 pounds)

A plywood drum?!?

  • As you can see from the table, no drum of any composition made to the UN Standard may exceed a maximum net mass of 400 kg (882 lb).
  • If you have a 55-gallon drum that exceeds a maximum net mass of 882 pounds, it is a violation of the HMR at 49 CFR 173.22(a)(2) for the shipper to offer it for transportation to the carrier.
  • It is a violation of the HMR at 49 CFR 177.801 for the carrier to accept a consignment containing a 55-gallon drum that exceeds a maximum net mass of 882 pounds.

I hope this helps. Please contact me with any other questions.

Daniels Training Services, Inc.

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

Conclusion:

He didn’t contact me with any follow-up questions. However, read here for the article that answers the question he posed after this one.