State RCRA Regulations

Cathode Ray Tube Recycling Facility Fined by Arizona DEQ

The Bullet:

Dlubak Glass, based in Blairsville, PA will pay a fine of $120,000 to the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality for violations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) regulations.

Read the ADEQ press release:  Arizona DEQ fines glass recycler

ADEQ in Arizona

The ADEQ regulates hazardous waste in Arizona

 Who:

Dlubak Glass, based in Blairsville, PA operates a cathode ray tube recycling facility in Yuma, AZ.  Violations were found and civil penalty assessed by the Arizona Department of Environmental Quality.

What:

“During an inspection ADEQ inspectors found broken CRT glass throughout the five-acre facility and stained soil in several locations. The stained soil also was observed extending about 20 feet into an orchard adjoining the Dlubak property. Samples taken on the property found levels of lead as much as 75 times more than the maximum federal and state exceedance level of five milligrams per liter.

In addition, the broken glass was stored in open, unlabeled cardboard containers and washing activities were conducted on an outdoor concrete pad. State regulations require that all CRT storage and processing activities be conducted within a building with a roof, floor and walls.”

Dlubak Glass was assessed a penalty of $120,000 for the above violations.

Where:

The Dlubak Glass facility where the violations occurred is located at 19538 S. Avenue 1 East in Yuma, AZ.  Dlubak Glass has other plants located in Pennsylvania, Ohio, Kentucky,Texas, and Oklahoma.

When:

Date of initial inspection was not indicated in the ADEQ press release.  The date the decision was announced was March 7, 2014.

Why:

“Their unlawful management of hazardous waste put employees and the environment at risk,” said ADEQ Director Henry Darwin. “But they hired environmental consultants, changed their operating procedures and did the soil cleanup in reaching a resolution in the case.”

Cathode ray tubes are found in many older computer monitors and televisions.  If recycled properly they are excluded from the definition of a solid waste and are therefore subject to little or no regulation.  However, the exclusion hinges on proper recycling of the CRTs which was not the case here.  If improperly managed during recycling CRTs may release lead and other harmful pollutants into the environment.

How:

As a state with an authorized hazardous waste program, the Arizona DEQ has the authority to inspect, investigate, and assess fines of facility’s found to be in violation of state regulations.  The state regulations of the ADEQ are designed to protect the health and safety of the environment and people of Arizona.

Conclusion:
If you generate a hazardous waste it is important that you conduct an audit of the facilities that receive your waste for treatment (eg. recycling) storage or disposal.  It is especially important if you are using a conditional exclusion from regulation for your waste that depends upon its proper recycling by the TSDF.

Not sure of your hazardous waste generator status?

Take this short survey

You must also provide initial (within 90 days) and annual training for all facility personnel if you are an LQG of hazardous waste.  Confused?  Call me for a free consultation on the regulations of the USEPA, ADEQ or the USDOT.

The New Solvent Wipes Conditional Exclusion in Iowa

Way back in July 23, 2013 the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced an impending – and long awaited – modification of the nation’s hazardous waste regulations to conditionally exclude certain solvent-contaminated wipes from specific hazardous waste requirements.  This long-awaited final rule makes the following changes to the EPA’s hazardous waste regulations:

RCRA exclusion for solvent contaminated wipes

What is the status of the Solvent Wipe Rule in Iowa?

  • Creates the following new terms and definitions at 40 CFR 260.10:
    • No free liquids
    • Solvent-contaminated wipes
    • Wipe
  • Creates a new conditional exclusion from definition as a solid waste at 40 CFR 261.4(a)(26):  Solvent-Contaminated Wipes Sent for Cleaning and Reuse
  • Creates a new conditional exclusion from definition as a hazardous waste at 40 CFR 261.4(b)(18):  Solvent-Contaminated Wipes, Except Wipes with Trichloroethylene, Sent for Disposal.

These new Federal regulations went into effect on January 31, 2014.  However, since they  represent a relaxation and reduction of existing EPA regulations they are not effective in states with an authorized hazardous waste program unless and until that state chooses to adopt them.  Among the states with an authorized hazaroud waste program, some have chosen to adopt the Federal rule as their own, some are in consideration, and others have indicated an intention not to adopt it, but what about Iowa?

The conditional exclusion for solvent wipes in Iowa

Iowa follows the Federal regulations for the management of hazardous waste.

Iowa does not have an authorized hazardous waste program under RCRA and, according to an informal conversation with an IDNR official, it has no intention of ever acquiring one.  Therefore this Federal rule is effective in Iowa as of January 31st 2014 and a person or business in Iowa has the option to follow this conditional exclusion for the management of its solvent-contaminated wipes.  Please carefully review the requirements of this conditional exclusion to determine your compliance with these Federal regulations.

 

 

 

 

 

First we’ll start with the new definitions in §260.10:

No free liquids, as used in 40 CFR 261.4(a)(26) and 40 CFR 261.4(b)(18), means that solvent-contaminated wipes may not contain free liquids as determined by Method 9095B (Paint Filter Liquids Test), included in “Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, Physical/Chemical Methods” (EPA Publication SW-846), which is incorporated by reference, and that there is no free liquid in the container holding wipes.  No free liquids may also be determined using another standard or test method as defined by an authorized state.

Solvent-contaminated wipe means a wipe that, after use or after cleaning up a spill, either (1) contains one or more of the F001 through F005 solvents listed in 40 CFR 261.31 or the corresponding P- or U- listed solvents found in 40 CFR 261.33; (2) exhibits a hazardous characteristic found in 40 CFR part 261 subpart C when that characteristic results from a solvent listed in 40 CFR part 261; and/or (3) exhibits only the hazardous waste characteristic of ignitability found in 40 CFR 261.21 due to the presence of one or more solvents that are not listed in 40 CFR part 261. Solvent-contaminated wipes that contain listed hazardous waste other than solvents, or exhibit the characteristic of toxicity, corrosivity, or reactivity due to contaminants other than solvents, are not eligible for the exclusions at 40 CFR 261.4(a)(26) and 40 CFR 261.4(b)(18).

Wipe means a woven or non-woven shop towel, rag, pad, or swab made of wood pulp, fabric, cotton, polyester blends, or other material.

The definition of No Free Liquids may mistakenly lead you to believe that any free liquids in a solvent-contaminated wipes container precludes the use of this exclusion; this is not so.  The issue of free liquids in the solvent-contaminated wipes container will be addressed later in this article.

Like this article?

Subscribe to my Monthly Newsletter

No marketing emails!

To meet the definition and be subject to the exclusion a solvent-contaminated wipe must be either of the following:

  • Cleaned and reused after use at an industrial laundry or dry cleaner (hereafter referred to as “reusable wipes”).

Or…

  • Disposed of after use at a municipal solid waste landfill or a solid waste combustion unit (hereafter referred to as “disposable wipes”).

In addition, a solvent contaminated wipe must be one of the following:

  • A wipe containing one or more F001-F005 listed solvents found in §261.31 or the corresponding P- or U-listed solvents found in §261.33, including those listed in Table 1:

Table 1 – Listed Solvents (from 40 CFR 261) for the Solvent-Contaminated Wipes Conditional Exclusion

Acetone

Isobutyl Alcohol

Benzene

Methanol

n-Butanol

Methyl Ethyl Ketone

Chlorobenzene

Methyl Isobutyl Ketone

Creosols

Methylene Chloride

Cyclohexanone

Tetrachloroethylene

1,2-Dichlorobenzene

Toluene

Ethyl Acetate

1,1,2-Trichloroethane

Ethyl Benzene

Trichloroethylene

(for reusable wipes only)

2-Ethoxyethanol

Xylenes

Or…

  • A wipe that exhibits a hazardous waste characteristic (Ignitability, Corrosivity, Reactivity, or Toxicity) resulting from a solvent listed in Table 1.

Or…

  • A wipe that exhibits only the hazardous characteristic of Ignitability resulting from a solvent not listed in §261 or Table 1.

Question:

What is an example of a solvent that exhibits only the hazardous characteristic of Ignitability from a solvent not listed in §261?

Answer:

Isopropyl Alcohol (aka Isopropanol) is just one example.

Whether reusable or disposable, a solvent-contaminated wipe must be managed according to specific requirements in order be subject to the exclusion, these include:

Container for Solvent Contaminated Wipes

Solvent Contaminated Wipes Must be Kept in a Closed Container

  • On-site accumulation and off-site transportation must be in closed containers (sealed for off-site transportation) that are capable of containing free liquids, if any are present.
  • Containers must be labeled:  “Excluded Solvent-Contaminated Wipes”.
  • On-site accumulation of solvent-contaminated wipes may not exceed 180 days.
  • Containers of solvent-contaminated wipes may not contain free liquids at the point of being sent off-site.  If present, any free liquids removed from the wipes during its on-site accumulation will need to be managed as a hazardous waste.  Free liquids may be present in a solvent-contaminated wipes container for the 180 days that it remains on-site and need not be managed as a distinct wastestream until the point the wipes are shipped off-site for disposal or laundering.
  • Generators of solvent-contaminated wipes must maintain records of documents that include:
    • Name and address of the laundry, dry cleaner, landfill, or combustion unit.
    • Evidence that the 180 day on-site accumulation limit has not been exceeded.  This can be accomplished by placing the initial date of accumulation on the container.
    • Description of the process the generator is using to meet the “no free liquids” condition.
  • As noted above, the presence of free liquids in the solvent-contaminated wipes container is not a violation of the regulations.  However, the free liquids, if present, must be managed properly when the solvent-contaminated wipes are shipped off-site.  To determine if free liquids are present, refer to the definition in §260.10, it references the EPA standard method to identify the presence of free liquids:  the Paint Filter Test.
  • A reusable wipe, if excluded from definition as a solid waste at 40 CFR 261.4(a)(26) is neither a solid waste nor a hazardous waste and is therefore not subject to any regulation in Iowa other than the requirements of the exclusion itself.
  • A disposable wipe, if excluded from definition as a hazardous waste at 40 CFR 261.4(b)(18), remains a solid waste and may be an Iowa Special Waste.  In Iowa, generators of Special Waste must receive approval from a landfill prior to disposal (see:  Special Waste Authorization in Iowa).
  • Disposable wipes that are contaminated with Trichloroethylene are not eligible for the exclusion.  EPA feels wipes contaminated with Trichloroethylene are not safe for disposal in a municipal solid waste landfill.  Therefore, these disposable wipes will need to be managed as a hazardous waste.
  • Reusable wipes must go to a laundry or dry cleaner whose wastewater discharge, if any, is regulated under the Clean Water Act.  Disposable wipes must go to one of the following:
    • A combustor regulated under the Clean Air Act.
    • A hazardous waste combustor, boiler, or industrial furnace regulated under RCRA.
    • A municipal solid waste landfill or hazardous waste landfill regulated under RCRA.

Daniels Training Services

815.821.1550/Info@DanielsTraining.com/https://www.danielstraining.com/

Much more information about the Solvent Wipe Rule can be found at the following sources:

Please don’t hesitate to contact me with any questions about the Solvent Wipe Rule or the management of hazardous waste in Iowa.

Recycling Industrial Waste (both Hazardous and Non-Hazardous) and Non-Industrial Hazardous Waste in Texas

A generator of any waste in Texas must take care to ensure compliance with the regulations of the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ).  The first step is to determine if the waste generated is an industrial solid waste or a non-industrial solid waste (read:  The Identification of Industrial and Non-Industrial Waste in Texas).  Only hazardous waste from a non-industrial source is subject to TCEQ regulation whereas both hazardous and non-hazardous waste from an industrial source is subject to regulation by the TCEQ.  But no matter whether it is hazardous waste from a non-industrial source or all waste from an industrial source, there is the possibility that, if recycled properly, the waste may be excluded from some or all regulation of the TCEQ.

TCEQ training for hazardous waste personnel

Exemptions from regulation are available for both hazardous and non-hazardous waste

To quote the TCEQ, “The regulations that govern industrial and hazardous waste recycling are fairly complex.”  That, I believe, is a Texas-sized understatement!  These regulations can be very complex, so proceed with caution.  After reading this summary of the existing regulations I suggest you conduct further research (additional sources of information are available at the end of this article). (more…)

The Identification of Industrial and Non-Industrial Waste in Texas

TCEQ training for hazardous waste personnel

TCEQ regulates hazardous and non-hazardous waste from both industrial and non-industrial facilities.

As a state that operates its own hazardous waste program under the authority of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), Texas has its own unique requirements for the regulation of both hazardous and non-hazardous waste.  An essential requirement of compliance with the TCEQ (Texas Commission on Environmental Quality) regulations is the determination of the source of the waste, either industrial or non-industrial.  The purpose of this article is to explain the difference between an industrial solid waste and non-industrial solid waste in regard to the waste regulations of the TCEQ.

(more…)

The Regulatory Requirements of a Maryland Small Quantity Generator

The Federal regulations of the USEPA recognize three status of hazardous waste generators under the regulations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), they are:

  • Large Quantity Generator (LQG).
  • Small Quantity Generator (SQG).
  • Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator (CESQG).

Not sure of your hazardous waste generator status?

Take this short survey

Hazardous Waste Training and HazMat Employee Training in Maryland

Maryland has an authorized Hazardous Waste Program

As a state with an authorized hazardous waste program Maryland has the authority to make its regulations more strict than those of the USEPA, and it has.  Unlike the USEPA, the Maryland Department of Environment (MDE) identifies only two hazardous waste generator status:

  • Fully Regulated Generator, which includes those who would be SQGs and LQGs under USEPA regulations.
  • Maryland Small Quantity Generator, which is roughly equivalent to the USEPA CESQG status.

In an earlier article I explained the process for determining your hazardous waste generator status in Maryland and briefly summarized the generator requirements.  The purpose of this article is to more thoroughly explain the regulatory requirements of a Maryland Small Quantity Generator of hazardous waste. (more…)

Ohio Environmental Protection Agency Division of Materials and Waste Management

The reporting season has begun for the 2013 Hazardous Waste Report, which this year is due on March 3, 2014.  You only have four weeks to finalize and submit your reports to the Ohio EPA detailing your 2013 hazardous waste activities.  Please consider submitting your report as soon as possible. High numbers of users can slow down the posting process online causing many delays during the last week prior to the due date.  This report is required of any facility that generated 2000 pounds or more of hazardous waste (or 2.2 pounds or more of acute hazardous waste) in any calendar month in 2013.

The only changes for the 2013 report are changes to some of the Management Method Codes and to the Waste Minimization Codes.  You can see a list of these changes on pages 2 to 3, 29 to 30 and 62 in the Hazardous Waste Report Instructions. If you are filing a paper report or importing data files make sure that you are using correct and up to date codes or your report will fail data validation.

If you are considering filing electronically for the first time please make sure that the facility’s Responsible Official has requested a PIN and then associated their account with the facility once that PIN has been activated.  These activities take time to complete and waiting until the last minute may result in a late submission.  The software has many features that help you prepare the report quickly and more accurately than on paper. The software allows the user to validate some of the information provided in the report which helps to reduce the possibility of violations. It also includes the ability to copy a previous year’s report as a starting point for a new report, even if you haven’t filed electronically in the past.

If your facility’s report was filed electronically for 2011 but there have been personnel changes, it’s time to have new users get eBiz accounts and/or PINs or terminate access rights for users no longer involved with the facility’s report.  For information on removing preparers or Responsible Officials, see “Changing Roles in eBiz” on the Report web page.

If you have any questions, including questions or concerns about getting started in eBiz, please contact:

USDOT and USEPA regulations require training for personnel who handle hazardous waste or work with hazardous materials

State and Federal regulations require the training of HazMat Employees and Hazardous Waste Personnel

 

Thomas Babb, Hazardous Waste Report Coordinator
thomas.babb@epa.ohio.gov

(614) 914-2527

View the 2013 Hazardous Waste Report Reminder from the Ohio EPA here.

If you are a Large Quantity Generator of hazardous waste you will be required to submit a hazardous waste report to your state or the USEPA either every other year (biennially) or annually.  In addition to submitting the hazardous waste report a Large Quantity Generator of hazardous waste must also complete initial and annual hazardous waste personnel training for all Facility Personnel involved in the generation, handling, management, disposal, treatment, or off-site shipment of hazardous waste.  Contact me for training or for a free consultation.

Day Accumulation Containers for Hazardous Waste in Kansas

Just like every other state with an authorized hazardous waste program Kansas allows a generator to accumulate hazardous waste without a permit in what is known as a Satellite Accumulation Container.  Most states (Missouri and California being exceptions) will allow for the accumulation of hazardous waste in a Satellite Accumulation Container without being subject to the on-site accumulation time limits of a Large Quantity Generator (no more than 90 days) or a Small Quantity Generator (no more than 180 days).

However, Kansas also provides the option of managing your hazardous waste in what the Kansas Department of Environmental Health (KDHE) refers to as a Day Accumulation Container.

49 CFR 172, Subpart H training and 40 CFR 265.16 training

Training for Hazardous Waste Personnel and HazMat Employees in Kansas

(more…)

Company Owner Offers his Side of the Story Regarding Alleged Violations of Environmental Regulations

So often the story I read from USEPA and state environmental agency press releases is one of greedy and careless business owners violating the environmental regulations in an attempt to make more money at the cost of the environment and public safety.  While I’m sure that image is sometimes correct it is also true that some business owners are simply unaware of the regulations they find themselves in violation of.  By the time they are made aware of the violations (let’s say they didn’t properly identify themselves as a hazardous waste generator, properly identify hazardous waste, and train employees on the company’s regulatory requirements), it may be too late.  Their awareness comes in the form of an agency inspection and a Notice of Violation.

Now of course we all know that “ignorance of the law is no excuse”, but it is also hard to understand how a company and it’s owners can be punished for the violation of regulations of whose existence they were not aware.  That is frequently the case of those who attend my HazMat Employee and RCRA Training Seminars, they simply aren’t aware of the regulations and how they apply to them.

Also, while some actions are so egregious, eg. dumping hazardous waste out back or burning it, some seem relatively harmless and easy to fix without imposing a fine, eg. not labeling hazardous waste drums stored on-site.  Yet, in the eyes of the government (state and federal) these are both violations of the regulations subject to fines and penalties.

Not sure of your hazardous waste generator status?

Take this short survey

This appears to be the case with a New Haven, CT business owner that finds himself facing the closure of his business due to what seems to be innocent mistakes (Connecticut DEEP fines New Haven business for violations of RCRA regulations).  Now, I don’t pretend to know all the facts in this case, and it appears that the business owner may have shot himself in the foot by ceasing to cooperate with the CT DEEP (Read the State of Connecticut’s complaint).  Still, the question remains if this is an enforcement action that should have proceeded this far at all.  Perhaps a good-faith approach to resolve the issues by both the CT DEEP and the business owner could have protected the environment and saved this small business and its local jobs.

I don’t pretend to know all the facts in this case, but here is what I do know:  my high-quality training for Hazardous Waste Personnel could have prevented all of these violations.  My training, whether Seminar, Onsite, or Web-Based would have revealed to the business owner the regulations he is alleged to have violated and what he could have done to come into compliance quickly and inexpensively.
USDOT and USEPA regulations require training for personnel who handle hazardous waste or work with hazardous materials

State & Federal regulations require the training of Facility Personnel

An added feature of my Onsite Training is that it includes a free walk-through of your site and a consultation on your regulatory compliance.  The information gathered during the walk-through is incorporated into the training materials along with options to attain compliance.  Often the fix to the problem, eg. labeling a hazardous waste container , is simple and easy.  Whereas the possible violations and fines can be devastating.

Contact me for the training you need, or for a free consultation.  I’m happy to answer your questions.

Daniels Training Services

815.821.1550/Info@DanielsTraining.com/www.DanielsTraining.com

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Annual Enforcement Report for FY 2013

TCEQ training for hazardous waste personnel

TCEQ regulates hazardous and non-hazardous waste from both industrial and non-industrial facilities.

This annual report provides the TCEQ Commissioners with key status and performance indicators about agency enforcement activities.

State law requires the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality to prepare an electronic enforcement report by December 1 each year that reports on the enforcement actions for each type of regulatory program in the agency.

This year’s report  includes the information listed below for the current fiscal year as well as the preceding five fiscal years.
2013 Enforcement Report
The enforcement report contains statistical indicators and a comparative analysis for the following enforcement related activities:

  • number of investigations and complaints by program and region;
  • number of notices of violation issued by program and region;
  • number and type of enforcement actions and lists of each action denoting the regulated entity name and location by county and region;
  • amount of penalties assessed, deferred, and required to be paid to General Revenue;
  • supplemental environmental project costs, offsets, and descriptions;
  • number and percentage of enforcement actions issued to persons who previously have committed the same or similar violations;
  • number and percentage of enforcement orders issued to entities that have been the subject of a previous enforcement order;
  • classification of violations as major, moderate, or minor;
  • most frequently cited rules/statutes in enforcement actions;
  • emissions events; and
  • other information which the Commission deems relevant, including information on the results of enforcement actions (i.e., environmental benefit, pollutant reductions, etc.).

From the TCEQ website:  The Annual Enforcement Report for FY 2013

Like this article?

Subscribe to my Monthly Newsletter

No marketing emails!

Since its environmental programs (air, water, & land) have been authorized by the USEPA, the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality is the primary regulatory agency within Texas responsible for the protection of the environment.  It is the regulations of the TCEQ and not those of the USEPA that must concern industry and other regulated persons within Texas.  If you are subject to the regulations of the TCEQ this Report will help you to better understand its priorities, and the repercussions for non-compliance.  If you generate any waste in Texas then you must be familiar with the regulations of the TCEQ pertaining to the generation, on-site management, transportation, and disposal of both hazardous and non-hazardous waste from both industrial and non-industrial sources.  Contact me with questions about the regulations of the TCEQ, the USEPA and the regulatory requirements of both to provide annual training for you and your employees.

Daniels Training Services

815.821.1550/Info@DanielsTraining.com/www.DanielsTraining.com

Industrial and Hazardous Waste Annual Waste Summary in Texas

The first deadline for submittal of this report for calendar year 2013 is fast approaching.  If you intend to submit the Annual Waste Summary to the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) by hardcopy it must be received by January 25, 2014.  If you intend to complete the report using STEERS the deadline for its submittal is March 1, 2014.  See below for information about this report and to confirm if it applies to you. (more…)