PO Box 1232 Freeport, IL 61032

A Different Kind Of Training

A Different Kind Of Training

A Different Kind Of Training

Q&A: How Must I use TCLP to Determine the Toxicity of my Hazardous Waste?

This series of questions came from a frequent reader of my newsletter:

Like this article?

Subscribe to my Monthly Newsletter

No marketing emails!

Good afternoon Daniel,

I appreciate the link to your google site. I knew I could come up with a question if I thought a little bit.

(1)  The filters on the aerosol can puncturing systems – may they be discarded as regular solid waste?   According to “New Pig”, the maker of the aerosol can puncturing system that my company sells, the filters may be discarded as regular solid waste.

(2)  In your experience with Black Beauty and its use as a sandblast material for unpainted metals, does used Black Beauty usually pass TCLP?  I know this is a very subjective question and I realize the parameters involved.  Just want your opinion.

(3)   How frequently do you see the use of the SPLP test vs. the TCLP?  Is it coming into more common use?

That’s all for now – and again, no pressing issues; these are simply some questions I have dragging around in the trunk of my car!

Feel free to call if you’d rather.

Contact me with any questions you may have about the generation, identification, management, and disposal of hazardous waste

Daniels Training Services

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://dev.danielstraining.com/

My reply was vague but helpful:

I will take a look at your questions and strive to get you an answer soon.

I did reply, a few days later:

I apologize for my delay in responding.  Please see below for my attempt to answer your questions.

1)  The filters on the aerosol can puncturing systems – may they be discarded as regular solid waste?   According to “New Pig”, the maker of the aerosol can puncturing system that my company sells, the filters may be discarded as regular solid waste.

  • New Pig is correct in its direction but may not have provided all of the necessary information.  Any material upon the point of discard becomes a solid waste per USEPA regulations.  This does not mean that it is solid as it could be a liquid, gas, or semi-solid.  The USEPA defines a solid waste at 40 CFR 261.2.  So, “yes” the filter is a solid waste when discarded.  However, the generator of a solid waste must conduct a hazardous waste determination to determine if it is a hazardous waste, what exclusions or exemptions may apply, and, if applicable, its hazardous waste codes.  This determination is the sole responsibility of the generator of the waste.  Since it is unlikely in my opinion that a spent carbon filter would be a listed hazardous waste (unless the aerosols punctured were pesticides), the generator would have to determine if it displays a characteristic:  Ignitability (unlikely), Corrosivity (unlikely), Reactivity (unlikely), or Toxicity (possible depending on what was in the cans punctured).  If the generator determines it is not a hazardous waste, then they may be disposed of as a non-hazardous waste which might – depending on state regulations – allow for disposal with common trash and garbage at a municipal solid waste facility.

(2)  In your experience with Black Beauty and its use as a sandblast material for unpainted metals, does used Black Beauty usually pass TCLP?  I know this is a very subjective question and I realize the parameters involved.  Just want your opinion.

  • Black Beauty is a coal slag blasting abrasive.  The question of whether or not it passes TCLP depends on one assumption and two criteria:
    1. Assumption:  The concern is regarding toxic levels of heavy metals.  I don’t think any other toxins will be an issue.
    2. Criteria 1:  Are there toxic levels of heavy metals in the coal slag prior to use?  I don’t think this is likely but without analytical from the supplier or some other source it is impossible to tell.
    3. Criteria 2:  Are toxic levels of heavy metals derived from the unpainted metal surface?  This is quite possible depending on the steel alloy treated.
  • Answer:  It is quite difficult to determine if a used sandblast material contains toxic levels of heavy metals without analysis.  I suggest analysis of random samples to determine if the characteristic of toxicity is present.  If several samples show no or little presence of leachable toxins, then I think the generator could with confidence state that the waste is non-hazardous.

(3)   How frequently do you see the use of the SPLP test vs. the TCLP?  Is it coming into more common use?

  • I have not heard of SPLP at all prior to your email (I had to google it).  I have not heard anything from USEPA indicating they intend to accept anything for determination of the characteristic of Toxicity other than TCLP or the “Rule of 20”.
I hope this helps.
 
Please don’t hesitate to contact me with any other questions.

Interested in a Webinar that covers this topic, and more!

My Webinar Training Schedule

I think my answers were what she was looking for:

Thank you very much for your thorough response to my questions.  I don’t know if the Rule of 20 is used very much in Florida, but it’s certainly good to know about.  I do remember something about…but I had to pull it out from my memory bank.

Love being on your mailing list and receiving the newsletter.

Have a great week.

Answering questions is what I do.  Whether it’s through my training (Onsite or Webinar), my consulting services, or by responding to the questions I get from EHS professionals like you.

Q&A: Is an Illinois Facility ID Number Required for a Company That Generates no More Than 100 kg of Special Waste per Month?

A question from a former coworker (way back a looong time ago we both worked for a hazardous waste transportation and disposal company that no longer exists:  Laidlaw Environmental Services) on August 8, 2016:

Hey Dan, hope you are doing well.

Wondering what your take is on the whole IEPA ID system…….I was always under the impression that if a generator was in the State of Illinois, regardless of their generator status, they have to ship waste for disposal on a Uniform Haz Manifest. This would also include Non haz special waste. I just had a conversation with Hope Wright (IEPA) and she told me that ILCESQG are not required to ship on a Uniform Haz manifest, therefore, they are not required to have an IEPA Number. She indicated that it would not hurt them to have one, but not required…I guess my questions is do you agree with her? I appreciate any input.

Thanks Dan!

Always happy to help an old friend; my reply that same day:

She is correct.

A CESQG of hazardous waste (generates no more than 100 kg of hazardous waste in a calendar month) is not required to have a USEPA Identification Number or to use the Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest per USEPA and Illinois EPA regulations.
In Illinois, a company that generates more than 100 kg of Class A special waste per month  must use the Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest for its off-site transportation.
Class A special waste includes the following:
  • Hazardous waste.
  • Potentially infectious medical waste (PIMW).  A non-hazardous waste.
  • Industrial process waste.  Even if a non-hazardous waste.
  • Pollution control waste.  Even if a non-hazardous waste.

Therefore, a company would need to generate no more than 100 kg (220 lbs) of all hazardous waste and non-hazardous waste in a calendar month in order to be a CESQG of special waste in Illinois and therefore be exempted from the requirement to use the Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest.

Even if a company believes it is below this threshold, transporters of special waste (which must be registered in Illinois) are hesitant to accept any shipment without a manifest for fear that the company is not a legitimate IL CESQG.

Non-special waste does not require the Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest.
I hope this helps.
My answer was what he was looking for:
I think it does. Thanks Dan, you’re still the man!!

Like this article?

Subscribe to my Monthly Newsletter

No marketing emails!

And, if you’re looking for more information about special waste in Illinois:

Overview of the RCRA Permit Program in 40 CFR 270

Persons who are a generator, transporter, or Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facility (TSDF) for a hazardous waste  must notify the USEPA of their activity within 90 days of becoming subject to the regulations and receive a RCRA permit within 6 months of that date.  A regulated facility may not generate, transport, treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste without a RCRA Permit.

The USEPA requires a RCRA permit for the “treatment”, “storage”, and “disposal” of any “hazardous waste”.  Each of these terms are defined in 40 CFR 270.2, and below.

Treatment means any method, technique, or process, including neutralization, designed to change the physical, chemical, or biological character or composition of any hazardous waste so as to neutralize such wastes, or so as to recover energy or material resources from the waste, or so as to render such waste non-hazardous, or less hazardous; safer to transport, store, or dispose of; or amenable for recovery, amenable for storage, or reduced in volume.

Storage means the holding of hazardous waste for a temporary period, at the end of which the hazardous waste is treated, disposed, or stored elsewhere.

Disposal means the discharge, deposit, injection, dumping, spilling, leaking, or placing of any hazardous waste into or on any land or water so that such hazardous waste or any constituent thereof may enter the environment or be emitted into the air or discharged into any waters, including ground water.

Hazardous waste means a hazardous waste as defined in 40 CFR 261.3.

By combining those definitions with the statement that precedes it, we come to the conclusion that any hazardous waste activity – including temporary on-site storage of a hazardous waste by a generator- requires a RCRA permit issued by the USEPA.

But, wait”, you say, “I’m a generator of a hazardous waste and I don’t have a RCRA permit! Am I in violation of the regulations?”

The answer is no, maybe.  Because, 40 CFR 270 goes on to describe specific inclusions and exclusions from the requirement to obtain a RCRA permit.

Specific inclusions.  A RCRA permit – and perhaps others – are required for the following activities:

  • Injection wells that dispose of hazardous waste.
  • The treatment, storage, or disposal of hazardous waste at facilities that require a Clean Water Act permit.
  • Barges or vessels that dispose of hazardous waste by ocean disposal and onshore hazardous waste treatment or storage facilities associated with ocean disposal.

Specific exclusions. The following persons are not required to obtain a RCRA permit:

  • Generators who accumulate hazardous waste on-site for less than the time periods provided in 40 CFR 262.34. These time limits are:
    • Large Quantity Generator:  No more than 90 days of on-site accumulation.  An extension is possible at the discretion of the USEPA or your state for  “unforeseen, temporary, and uncontrollable circumstances”.  An extension of up to 180 days is allowed for LQGs of an F006 hazardous waste under certain conditions.  Read about the extension to the on-site accumulation time limit for LQGs of F006 hazardous waste.
    • Small Quantity Generator:  No more than 180 days of on-site accumulation.   An extension is possible at the discretion of the USEPA or your state for  “unforeseen, temporary, and uncontrollable circumstances”.  An extension of up to 270 days is allowed if the TSDF the generator must use is 200 miles away or more.
    • Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator (soon to be Very Small Quantity Generator):  No on-site accumulation time limit.

 

Read more about the on-site accumulation time limits and the available extensions for hazardous waste generators.

  • Farmers who dispose of hazardous waste pesticides from their own use.
  • Facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste that is derived solely from generators that are excluded from regulation, i.e. conditionally exempt small quantity generators.
  • Totally enclosed treatment facilities.
  • Elementary neutralization units or wastewater treatment units.
  • Transporters who store manifested shipments of hazardous waste in containers at a transfer facility for no more than 10 days.
  • Persons who add absorbent material to waste in a container and persons adding waste to absorbent material in a container, provided that these actions occur at the moment waste is first placed in the container; and other generator container requirements are met.
  • Universal waste handlers and universal waste transporters that are subject to the universal waste regulations.
  • A New York State utility central collection facility consolidating hazardous waste in accordance with 40 CFR 262.90.

Further exclusions. A person is not required to obtain a RCRA permit for treatment or containment activities taken during the immediate response to any of the following situations:

  • A discharge of a hazardous waste.
  • An imminent and substantial threat of a discharge of a hazardous waste.
  • A discharge of a material which, when discharged, becomes a hazardous waste.
  • An immediate threat to human health, public safety, property, or the environment from the known or suspected presence of military munitions, other explosive material, or an explosive device.

Any treatment or containment activities that take place after the immediate response to any of the above is complete is subject to all applicable requirements of the EPA regulations, including a RCRA permit.

If a RCRA permit is required, TSDFs that engage in one of the following regulated activities may be eligible for a standardized RCRA permit:

  • The facility generates a hazardous waste and then non-thermally treats or stores the hazardous waste on site in tanks, containers, or containment buildings.
  • The facility  receives hazardous waste generated off-site by a generator under the same ownership as the receiving facility, and then stores or non-thermally treats the hazardous waste in containers, tanks, or containment buildings.

Contact me with any questions you may have about the generation, identification, management, and disposal of hazardous waste

Daniels Training Services

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://dev.danielstraining.com/

There you have it!  While initially the regulations require a hazardous waste generator to have a RCRA permit, compliance with the on-site accumulation time limits applicable their status exempts them from the requirement to obtain a RCRA permit.  However, this means that non-compliance with those same on-site accumulation time limits – even by one day – makes a generator subject to the regulations requiring them to have a RCRA permit.  Not having a RCRA permit when you are required by federal and state regulations to have one could result in very serious penalties!  My Onsite Training for hazardous waste personnel is a great way to ensure that everyone at your facility is aware of these very important regulations.

Q&A: How do I Ship Hazardous Waste Generated by Homeowners?

Here is a question I received almost a year ago on December 17, 2015 from a person who found me while searching the internet for an answer to his questions:

sign for household hazardous waste collection siteDaniel, hope this finds you well.  Could you give me your opinion on waste disposal companies using ORM-D for Household Hazardous Waste (HHW) shipping names (e.g. flammable paint, cleaners that may have low or high pH and others that may fit into DOT respective hazard classes).  I am concerned as the material is no longer packaged according to the original  ORM-D packaging.  Are you familiar with any US DOT interpretation that would allow that those shipping names continue to be used?  My concern comes from reviewing a waste disposal company that is still using ORM-D shipping names.  Thanks for input and thoughts.  Wish you a Merry Christmas, Thanks.

Well, it took me a few days.  But just before Christmas (12.22.15), I replied:

I apologize for my delay in replying to your question.  I’ll do my best to answer it below.

  • Waste collected from households is excluded from regulation as a hazardous waste at 40 CFR 261.4(b)(1).  See this short presentation for more information:  The Household Hazardous Waste Exclusion.
  • Due to the HHW exclusion, the waste does not require a Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest when transported or offered for transportation by the Shipper/Generator.
  • USDOT/PHMSA regulations define a hazardous waste as a waste that requires the Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest when transported.  Therefore, excluded HHW is not a hazardous waste per USDOT/PHMSA regulations.
  • As you describe, the excluded HHW may be a USDOT/PHMSA hazardous material for other reasons, e.g. Class 3 Flammable, Class 8 Corrosive, &etc.
  • Hazardous materials that meet the requirements of the Consumer Commodity exception may be re-classified as an ORM-D and shipped accordingly.  Read more about the Consumer Commodity Exception in this short article.
  • Use of the Consumer Commodity Exception for an excluded HHW does require compliance with specified packing instructions but it does not require the original packaging.Household hazardous waste accumulated at collection site

In sum, if the Shipper/Generator is complying with the HHW exclusion and the Consumer Commodity Exception, then they should be able to ship the waste as a Consumer Commodity.

 I hope this helps.  Please don’t hesitate to contact me with any other questions.
[maxbutton id=”1″]
Hazardous Waste TSDF

The Regulations of the e-Manifest System

The e-Manifest System is designed and almost entirely – not quite, still waiting on another piece of legislation and regulation that will determine how to pay for it – created by EPA to replace the current paper-b0und system.  It’s run into a few snags, missed a few deadlines, and is currently scheduled for implementation in Spring of 2018.  But honestly, given the recent presidential election, the future of all pending legislation is uncertain.  Check out this simple infographic on the timeline of the e-Manifest System.

The purpose of this article is to identify and explain the new regulations created in order to implement the e-Manifest System.

(more…)

Q&A: Hazardous Waste Determination for Lab Waste

A question from a former customer of mine on June 14, 2016:

Hello again Dan,

I’m sorry to bother you with another question but I’m having trouble deciphering this information.  I’m looking to do some lab tests.  I was first reviewing the SDS for the reagents involved and two include hazardous waste disposal.

The  Peroxydisulfuric Acid, Dipotassium Salt in the Metals Prep set Reagent B  and potassium cyanide in Lead TNT Reagent Vial.  (Safety Data Sheets were attached to the email)

Could you please explain disposal considerations for both of these (how they must be disposed of and why).  Is there any quantity guidelines (like you told me about As)?

Once again I greatly appreciate your help!

I replied a few days later on June 16th:

I will try to answer your questions and provide the answers you need.

  • The Safety Data Sheet (SDS) is authorized and required to be used by OSHA, the Occupational Health and Safety Administration.  While its information can be useful, it is not authorized by the USEPA.  Specifically, sections 1 through 11 and 16 of the SDS are authorized and required by OSHA.  Sections 12 through 15 – including section 13 Disposal Considerations  – is not authorized or required by OSHA.  Information in these unauthorized sections of the SDS is provided voluntarily the manufacturer and may not be relied upon for compliance.
  • The generator of a waste must determine if a waste is hazardous and then manage it properly from “cradle-to-grave.”
  • Based on the information on the SDS for the product Metals Prep Set Reagent B it is 100% Potassium persulfate and an oxidizer.  If it retains the characteristic of an oxidizer at its point of generation as a waste, i.e. when you discard it, then it will be a hazardous waste for the characteristic of Ignitability (D001).
  • Based on the information on the SDS for the product Lead TNT Reagent Vial it contains 60-70% potassium cyanide which is a p-listed material.  It may be a p-listed hazardous waste if it is disposed of unused.  If it is used then the P-code will not apply.  It is also possible – but unlikely – that it could also be a hazardous waste for the characteristic of Reactivity (D003) if it emits cyanide gas at toxic levels.

Summary:

While the SDS can be a good source of information, it is not the final word on the determination of whether or not a waste is hazardous.  It is important to note that the SDS describes an unused product and may not be an accurate description of that product when it becomes a waste.
The responsibility for the hazardous waste determination is solely the generator’s.
I hope this helps.
Please don’t hesitate to contact me with any questions or if you require HazMat Employee Training or Hazardous Waste Personnel Training.
That seemed to settle it!

History of the e-Manifest System

In a separate article I document the requirements of the e-Manifest System for a hazardous waste generator.

Here I simply wanted to create a timeline for the important dates in the history of the e-Manifests implementation.

[slideshare id=69305841&doc=historyofthee-manifest-161119234926]

Contact me with any questions you may have about the generation, identification, management, and disposal of hazardous waste

Daniels Training Services

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://dev.danielstraining.com/

Responsibility of Hazardous Waste Transporters to Respond to Hazardous Waste Discharges

A transporter of hazardous waste is a person that moves hazardous waste between sites by highway, rail, water or air.  Typically a hazardous waste transporter is the link between the generator of a hazardous waste and the site where it is recycled, treated, stored, or disposed of, aka:  Treatment, Storage, or Disposal Facility or TSDF.  Regulations of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) pertaining to hazardous waste transporters are found at 40 CFR 263.  The requirements of a hazardous waste transporter include:

  • Comply with all applicable regulations of the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) for the transport in commerce of a hazardous waste.
  • Obtain an EPA Identification Number.
  • Comply with transfer facility requirements, if applicable.
  • Comply with EPA’s Hazardous Waste Manifest System.
  • Respond to hazardous waste discharges that occur during transportation.

The purpose of this article is to explain the responsibility of a hazardous waste transporter to respond to a discharge of hazardous waste per 40 CFR 263, subpart C. (more…)

Q&A: Hazardous Waste Determination for Sodium Arsenite

May 6, 2016, a question from a past attendee of one of my Training Seminars (unfortunately, I don’t provide Training Seminars anymore.  Check out my website for other training options:  Onsite Training or Webinar Training).

Hi Dan
I took a class with you a couple years ago.
I have another question for you. I figure if you don’t know the answer you might be able to direct me to where I’d find it.
We would like to do a lab test which requires sodium arsenite which is a hazardous waste. In the test, the sodium arsenite will be greatly diluted. Does the diluted solution then become hazardous waste?
I would greatly appreciate any direction you can give me.

My reply the next day (May 7, 2016):

I will try to answer your question.

  • If the diluted solution of sodium arsenite is to be discarded, it must be managed as a solid waste.  The term “solid waste” as used by USEPA and most states is not limited to wastes in a solid form.  A “solid waste” could be a solid, liquid, semi-solid, or containerized gas.
  • The generator of a solid waste must conduct a hazardous waste determination.
  • Sodium arsenite and the process of generation you indicate does not appear to be a listed hazardous waste.  It does not appear on any of the following codifications of listed hazardous waste:
    • Hazardous waste from non-specific sources (F-codes).
    • Hazardous waste from specific sources (K-codes).
    • Discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill residues thereof (P-codes for acutely toxic and U-codes for toxic).
  • Sodium arsenite does not appear to display the characteristic of any of the following hazardous wastes:
    • Ignitability (D001)
    • Corrosivity (D002)
    • Reactivity (D003)
  • Arsenic is a toxin identified by the USEPA at 40 CFR 261.24.  It is possible, therefore, that it displays the characteristic of toxicity (D004 – D043) for arsenic (D004).
  • A waste containing arsenic may be a toxic hazardous waste (D004) if it contains a leachable concentration of arsenic above the regulatory threshold of 5.0 mg/L.  In other words, if it displays the characteristic of toxicity.
  • Analysis by the Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure (TCLP) is one way to determine the concentration of a toxin in leachate derived from a waste in a solid form.  If the waste is already in a liquid form, the total concentration of the toxin must be determined.
  • Another – and less expensive – method to determine if your waste displays the characteristic of toxicity is the “Rule of 20”.  Read more about TCLP and alternatives to it here.
  • It is possible, if greatly diluted, that the waste you discard may not be a toxic hazardous waste.
Thank you and please don’t hesitate to contact me if you have any other questions.

Contact me with any questions you may have about the generation, identification, management, and disposal of hazardous waste

Daniels Training Services

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://dev.danielstraining.com/

My reply appears to have been satisfactory:
Thank you VERY much!  That makes a lot of sense.
Have a great weekend!
Outdoor storage of hazardous waste containers

Five RCRA Hazardous Waste Violations You’re Probably Making Right Now — and can fix today!

I don’t mean to scare you, but this is important and I had to get your attention with the title.  I’ve provided training and seen businesses all over this country in the past few  years and I’ve observed these same violations time and again.

The bad news?  An agency inspection – State or Federal – that results in the discovery of these violations could result in serious fines, even if no one was hurt or the environment damaged.

The good news?  These violations – if you have them – are so easy to fix!  Just an hour or two of time dedicated to them and you can be back in compliance before you go home today.

Disclaimer and Limitations:

I haven’t seen your facility (though I’d love to!  Contact me for a free consultation and site visit that accompanies your Onsite Training) so I don’t know for sure what your status is with the environmental regulations.  Also, I can only address the regulations of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in this article.  You may have more strict – or at least different – regulations of your state of which I am not aware.  Once again, my Onsite Training is a great way to be trained on, and receive help coming into compliance with, state regulations if you do business in a state with an authorized hazardous waste program.

Contact me with any questions you may have about the generation, identification, management, and disposal of hazardous waste

Daniels Training Services

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://dev.danielstraining.com/

So, in no particular order, those violations and the simple fixes:

Violation #1:

Identifying a used oil tank or container as anything other than “Used Oil”.  Unless you do business in Pennsylvania where it is identified as “Waste Oil” or California where it is “Hazardous Waste Used Oil”, the Federal regulations, and every state I am aware of, require a used oil generator to label containers, tanks and fill pipes for used oil as “Used Oil”.  40 CFR 279.22(c) couldn’t be more clear:

(c) Labels. (1) Containers and aboveground tanks used to store used oil at generator facilities must be labeled or marked clearly with the words “Used Oil.”

(2) Fill pipes used to transfer used oil into underground storage tanks at generator facilities must be labeled or marked clearly with the words “Used Oil.”

The Fix for Violation #1:Used oil tank

Print out “Used Oil” labels and affix them to every container or tank that contains used oil.  That will do for today.  Tomorrow, have someone create a stencil for “Used Oil” or devise some more durable form of identification.

Learn more!

Violation #2:

Not marking hazardous waste containers with the date of initial hazardous waste accumulation; i.e. the calendar date that the “first drop” of hazardous waste was placed in the container and the words “Hazardous Waste”.  It’s simple really, the day that hazardous waste is first placed in a container it must be marked with the words “Hazardous Waste” and the date.  This requirement applies to a large quantity generator of hazardous waste (LQG) per 40 CFR 262.34(a)(2 & 3):

(2) The date upon which each period of accumulation begins is clearly marked and visible for inspection on each container;

(3) While being accumulated on-site, each container and tank is labeled or marked clearly with the words, “Hazardous Waste”; and

It also applies to a small quantity generator of hazardous waste (SQG) per 40 CFR 262.34(d)(4), which refers back to the LQG responsibility at §262.34(a)(2 & 3):

(4) The generator complies with the requirements of paragraphs (a)(2) and (a)(3) of this section, the requirements of subpart C of part 265, with all applicable requirements under 40 CFR part 268; and

The following are not subject to these regulations:

  • A conditionally exempt small quantity generator of hazardous waste (CESQG).
  • An LQG or SQG that accumulates hazardous waste in a what’s commonly known as a “satellite accumulation area” pursuant to 40 CFR 262.34(c).

The Fix for Violation #2:

If you’re and LQG or SQG, take a walk around and make sure that every hazardous waste container – unless in a satellite accumulation area – is marked with the accumulation start date and “Hazardous Waste”.  It doesn’t have to be fancy, it doesn’t have to be a pre-printed label, it doesn’t have to have any information other than what is indicated here (check with your state to be sure).  Just make sure it is visible to your Hazardous Waste Personnel and to an inspector.

Violation #3:

Hazardous waste containers at an LQG or SQG that are not closed as required by 40 CFR 265.173(a), a section within 40 CFR 265, subpart I which is referred to as a requirement for both an LQG and an SQG.

(a) A container holding hazardous waste must always be closed during storage, except when it is necessary to add or remove waste.

“Closed” sounds like it should be easy to describe, but it’s not.  It can be summarized as a performance standard that requires the container to be vapor-tight so there is no detectable release of vapors without the use of instruments and to be spill-proof so there will be no release of a hazardous waste even when the container is knocked over.  That’s a pretty high standard and requires more than just a container’s lid held snugly in place.

The Fix to Violation #3:

If a container uses bungs or bolts for its closure, ensure they are in use at all times.  Long-term training employees and providing them with the right tools will help ensure you stay in compliance.  These latching lids from New Pig are one way to ensure compliance without hindering your employees access to the containers.

Learn more!

Violation #4:

A small quantity generator of hazardous waste that has not posted emergency contact information near its external communication devices.  While a good idea for all hazardous waste generators – and indeed, all businesses regardless of the hazardous waste generated – EPA regulations at 40 CFR 262.34(d)(5)(ii) mandate this simple measure only for the SQG:

(ii) The generator must post the following information next to the telephone:

(A) The name and telephone number of the emergency coordinator;

(B) Location of fire extinguishers and spill control material, and, if present, fire alarm; and

(C) The telephone number of the fire department, unless the facility has a direct alarm.

Like this article?

Subscribe to my Monthly Newsletter

No marketing emails!

The Fix for Violation #4:

You may want to check with your state environmental agency, but below I’ve provided a document from the Michigan DEQ website that meets the EPA requirements and likely that of your state as well.  Just be sure to remove the reference to the “Michigan Pollution Emergency” phone number at the bottom of the page.

You must post this information near any communication device that would be used in an emergency to contact emergency response personnel outside of the facility.

Violation #5:

Universal waste containers not identified with one of the following options:

  • “Universal Waste xxxxx”
  • “Waste xxxxx”
  • “Used xxxxx”

“xxxxx” in the above could be: “Battery(ies)”, “Lamp(s)”, “Mercury-Containing Device(s)”, or “Pesticides”.  Or it could be a universal waste specific to your state.  Both a small quantity handler and a large quantity handler of universal waste must comply with this simple requirement per 40 CFR 173.14(a) or §173.34(a):

(a) Universal waste batteries (i.e., each battery), or a container in which the batteries are contained, must be labeled or marked clearly with any one of the following phrases: “Universal Waste—Battery(ies),” or “Waste Battery(ies),” or “Used Battery(ies);”

The Fix for Violation #5:

“Simple” and yet so often done incorrectly.  Don’t label your universal waste containers as “Bad lamps” or “Batteries to Recycle”, or “spent batteries”, or whatever else you can think of that is not one of the three available options.

No fancy labels are required.  Just print them and slap them on the container, or nearby if you have a distinct storage area.

That’s enough for now!

Sure there are more, for starters:

  • Not managing your hazardous waste container at or near the point of generation when in a satellite accumulation area per 40 CFR 262.34(c).
  • Not including the home address and phone numbers of the emergency coordinators identified in your contingency plan.
  • Accumulating hazardous waste on-site in excess of the time and/or volume limits of your hazardous waste generator status.
  • Not completing a documented hazardous waste determination for all waste generated.
  • More…

Contact me with any questions you may have about the generation, identification, management, and disposal of hazardous waste

Daniels Training Services

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://dev.danielstraining.com/

Those violations are more complicated to explain and the solutions will take more of your time.  The five I’ve identified here are common occurrences with simple fixes.  If you have any other questions regarding your compliance with the hazardous waste regulations of the USEPA or of your state, please don’t hesitate to contact me.  I’ll help you with the easy stuff and the hard stuff.