Hazardous Waste Determination

Q&A: Hazardous Waste (Aerosol Cans) in an Office Environment

First contact March 15, 2016:

Daniel,

Do empty aerosol cans that are generated in an office environment have to be treated the same as if they were generated in a manufacturing environment? We generate empty aerosol cans in our manufacturing plant and treat them as hazardous waste. We accumulate them in a metal 55 gallon drum and when filled we pay someone to generate a manifest and pick them up for disposal. How are empty aerosol cans disposed of in an office building? Can they just be tossed in the trash?

I would appreciate any input on this that you can provide. We are located in St. Louis, MO.

My snap reply that same day:

Management of waste aerosol cans, and indeed all waste, is subject to the same federal and state regulations if it comes from a business.

And, a more thorough answer also on March 15th:

The question of whether or not aerosol cans are a hazardous waste is tricky.  Please note below:

  • If they meet the definition of RCRA Empty they may be disposed of in the trash.  Be careful with this since some landfills and state agencies don’t like to see unpunctured aerosol cans in the trash.
  • If destined for recycling as scrap metal they don’t have to be RCRA Empty.  Be careful with this since some recyclers don’t like to see unpunctured aerosol cans in their scrap.
  • If destined for recycling you may puncture the cans in a device designed for that purpose (follow all worker safety regulations).  This is not considered to be treatment of a hazardous waste if the punctured cans are to be recycled.
  • Many aerosol cans are a D001 Ignitable or D002 Corrosive hazardous waste due to their contents.  I believe that an aerosol can retaining any pressure will be a D003 Reactive hazardous waste no matter its contents.  Not everyone agrees with that.

I hope this helps.   Please don’t hesitate to contact me with any other questions.

 Below are some articles I’ve written in the past that will assist in understanding the conclusions of this Q&A:

Contact me with any questions you may have about the generation, identification, management, and disposal of hazardous waste

Daniels Training Services

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

Recordkeeping Requirements of 40 CFR 261.4(a)(20)(ii)(D)

USEPA regulations at 40 CFR 261.4(a)(20) provide for a conditional exclusion from management as a solid waste – and therefore as a hazardous waste as well – for hazardous secondary materials used to make zinc fertilizers.  You can learn more about the full conditional exclusion here:  40 CFR 261.4(a)(20)  Hazardous Secondary Materials Used to Make Zinc Fertilizers.

The purpose of this article is to detail one requirement of the conditional exclusion: the requirement at 40 CFR 261.4(a)(20)(ii)(D) for generators or intermediate handlers of a hazardous secondary material used to make zinc fertilizers to maintain at their facility records of all shipments of hazardous secondary materials.  Records must be kept for no less than three years. (more…)

One Time Notice to USEPA or State Environmental Agency per 40 CFR 261.4(a)(20)(ii)(A)

USEPA regulations at 40 CFR 261.4(a)(20) provide for a conditional exclusion from management as a solid waste – and therefore as a hazardous waste as well – for hazardous secondary materials used to make zinc fertilizers.  You can learn more about the full conditional exclusion here:  40 CFR 261.4(a)(20)  Hazardous Secondary Materials Used to Make Zinc Fertilizers.

The conditional exclusion identifies three entities:

  • Generator of the hazardous secondary material subject to the exclusion.
  • Intermediate handler of the excluded hazardous secondary material (may not be necessary).
  • Manufacturer of zinc fertilizer or zinc fertilizer ingredients made from the excluded hazardous secondary material.

The purpose of this article is to detail one requirement of the conditional exclusion: the requirement at 40 CFR 261.4(a)(20)(ii)(A) for generators and intermediate handlers of a hazardous secondary material used to make zinc fertilizers to submit a one-time notice to the USEPA or their state environmental regulatory agency. (more…)

Q&A: Disposal of Used X-Ray Lamps

This question was posted on a Yahoo Group, of which I am a member, back on January 22, 2016:

A very happy Friday to all.

Here is an interesting one.

I have five used X-ray Lamps to dispose of.

Ohio makes this difficult.

The Ohio Department of Health claims that Ohio EPA has declared the lamps a Hazardous Waste.

They actually state that the lamps con only be disposed of by “approved Vendors”.

They have a web page with a list of these Vendors.

These vendors are running a scam by way overpricing the disposal citing ODH, Ohio EPA rules and requirements.

I have seen prices from $125.00-$425.00/lamp.

This is complete Client Abuse.

Ohio EPA has no idea what ODH is doing about this.

The lamps are not a Hazardous Waste. (Ohio EPA confirms this)

The lamps are X-ray emitters only if energized.

There is no lead.

We might have silver since the electrical contact need to be of a higher temperature material than lead.

We might have a beryllium ring as part of the structure.  This is not a hazardous waste nor is it dangerous unless we have the dust form.

The lamps have one of the noble gasses inside and they are under pressure.

Dropping or banging one can cause the lamp to shatter and explode.

I am looking for a vendor that can dispose of the used X-ray lamps in a safe and economical manor.

Any ideas would be useful.

I had five lamps, this is down to four lamps and a bunch of pieces.

These puppies are heavy and slippery.

I can legally destroy these items myself.  I would rather not do that.  But I can be persuaded.

HELP!!!

Normally many others reply to these questions before I get a chance but this time I was right there with an answer:

The lamps you describe may be a hazardous waste due to the presences of silver.  The presence of a concentration of silver in the leachate (aka: extract) created by the waste equal to or greater than 5 mg/L (same as parts per million) would require the D011 hazardous waste code for the characteristic of toxicity per 40 CFR 261.24.  40 CFR is the federal regulation and not the state of Ohio but Ohio EPA has incorporated this federal regulation into its own.

The presence of D011 and other toxins can be determined by analysis with the Toxicity Characteristic Leachate Procedure (TCLP).  Or, as the generator of the waste you may assume that it contains silver at toxic levels.
However, federal and state regulations allow you to manage a lamp or bulb that is a hazardous waste as a universal waste.  This article of mine summarizes the universal waste regulations of Ohio and Kentucky.
I am not certain but I don’t think the Ohio Department of Health regulates the management or disposal of hazardous waste or universal waste.  That is the responsibility of the USEPA & the Ohio EPA.
I see three options:
  1. Determine conclusively that it is not a hazardous waste.  Best outcome but may be difficult to prove.
  2. Manage as a hazardous waste.  Easiest to do but highest cost and regulatory burden.
  3. Manage as a universal waste.  Easy to do and may be an inexpensive disposal if you can find a universal waste recycler willing to take them.
I hope this helps.  Please don’t hesitate to contact me with any questions.
Daniel Stoehr
Daniels Training Services

Q&A: Do I have a P-Listed Hazardous Waste?

A Question (way back on February 16th) requesting help with the annual hazardous waste report (Due March 1st!):

I am completing the annual hazardous waste report and am trying to determine whether the material is non-acute or acute. Hopefully you can answer my question and offer a bit more information.

Looking through the forms, I think we are P042.

This may be all I need, however; I would appreciate any articles you may share with me.

I also spoke with this person over the phone to gather additional information.  The inquisitor referred to “epi pins” that they discard as a waste.

My answer a few hours later that same day (I knew she was in a rush for the information):

I apologize for my delay, my return to the office took longer than I thought.  Your situation calls for more research but I will do my best to answer your question and direct you to additional information.

Excerpt from the USEPA List of Lists

  • In addition to being listed by name the material must also be one of the below.  Also, read What is a P- or U-Listed Hazardous Waste?
    • Unused or virgin, or;
    • An intermediate product you manufactured, or;
    • An off-spec version of a listed material, or;
    • Residue in a container that is not “RCRA Empty”, or;
    • Residue or recovered spilled material.
  • Any P-Listed hazardous waste is also known as an acute hazardous waste.  Read: What is an Acute Hazardous Waste?

If the “epi pins” you mentioned meet the above criteria, it is likely you are a generator of an acute hazardous waste and likely a Large Quantity Generator (LQG).  Read:  Determine Hazardous Waste Generator Status From Acute Hazardous Waste.

Further questions:
  • Are you the generator of this waste?  If you are gathering this waste from others, then it is possible that you are not the generator of the waste; the ones sending it to you are the generators.
  • Who are the “persons” sending you the waste?  If they are excluded or exempt from regulation, e.g. a household, it is likely the waste is excluded as well and therefore not subject to reporting.
  • If the “persons” sending you the waste are not excluded from regulation, how are they sending it you?  Hazardous waste is not usually sent by mail.
  • There are other hazardous wastes, both listed and characteristic, associated with medical or pharmaceutical waste.  Do you have other hazardous waste to report?
  • If not an excluded hazardous waste is it being managed according to the RCRA regulations (state and federal) applicable to a Large Quantity Generator?  Requirements include:  annual training (I do this!), weekly inspections, emergency preparedness, a Contingency Plan, closed containers labeled and marked, 90 day on-site accumulation time limit, more…
I can help you out with any questions you may have about the regulations for waste management and the transportation of hazardous materials.

Contact me with any questions you may have about the generation, identification, management, and disposal of hazardous waste

Daniels Training Services

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

I didn’t hear from the person after that.  I only hope my answer was of some help.

What is a D003 Reactive Hazardous Waste?

The EPA – and most states with an authorized hazardous waste program – identify two types of hazardous waste:

Listed:

  • Hazardous waste from non-specific sources (F-codes).
  • Hazardous waste from specific sources (K-codes).
  • Discarded commercial chemical products, off-specification species, container residues, and spill residues thereof (P-codes & U-codes).

And…

Characteristic:

The purpose of this article is to explain how EPA identifies the characteristic of Reactivity (D003).

The characteristic of Reactivity is codified in Title 40 of the Code of Federal Regulations at 40 CFR 261.23.  It reads:

a) A solid waste exhibits the characteristic of reactivity if a representative sample of the waste has any of the following properties:

(1) It is normally unstable and readily undergoes violent change without detonating.

(2) It reacts violently with water.

(3) It forms potentially explosive mixtures with water.

(4) When mixed with water, it generates toxic gases, vapors or fumes in a quantity sufficient to present a danger to human health or the environment.

(5) It is a cyanide or sulfide bearing waste which, when exposed to pH conditions between 2 and 12.5, can generate toxic gases, vapors or fumes in a quantity sufficient to present a danger to human health or the environment.

(6) It is capable of detonation or explosive reaction if it is subjected to a strong initiating source or if heated under confinement.

(7) It is readily capable of detonation or explosive decomposition or reaction at standard temperature and pressure.

(8) It is a forbidden explosive as defined in 49 CFR 173.54, or is a Division 1.1, 1.2 or 1.3 explosive as defined in 49 CFR 173.50 and 173.53.

Like this article?

Subscribe to my Monthly Newsletter

No marketing emails!

(b) A solid waste that exhibits the characteristic of reactivity has the EPA Hazardous Waste Number of D003.

Right from the start – paragraph (a) – the regulation may mislead you into thinking there is a test method for Reactivity because of its reference to “a representative sample of the waste…”.  There is not.  Nowhere in section §261.23 does it refer to a test method for determining the characteristic of Reactivity.  For the characteristic of Reactivity a generator making a hazardous waste determination must rely solely on generator knowledge as allowed by §261.10(a)(2)(ii).

From the EPA website:  "There are currently no test methods available."

So what is a reactive hazardous waste?  It is any solid waste (i.e. any material that is disposed of by being abandoned or recycled, is inherently waste-like, or is a military munition) that exhibits any one of the following characteristics:

Unstable:

It is normally unstable and readily undergoes violent change without detonating.

A waste meeting this characteristic would normally be in an unstable state; defined in general chemistry as compounds that readilydecompose or change into other compounds.  And it also must readily undergo a violent change without detonating (aka exploding).    Note that the trigger for the “violent change”, e.g. pressure, water, heat, &etc. is not specified.  It is clear that they do not mean to include explosives here as they are addressed later in this characterization.

A lithium battery may be a reactive hazardous waste due to its instability (Faxback 11274) unless it has been fully discharged (RO 11229).

I’m no scientist but here’s a good explanation of why lithium batteries sometimes go off:  Here’s why Lithium Batteries Occasionally Catch Fire.

Here is an example of a lithium battery’s instability:

Lithium batteries may be managed with other hazardous waste batteries as a universal waste.

Contact me with any questions you may have about the generation, identification, management, and disposal of hazardous waste

Daniels Training Services

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

Water Reactives:

It reacts violently with water.

It forms potentially explosive mixtures with water.

When mixed with water, it generates toxic gases, vapors or fumes in a quantity sufficient to present a danger to human health or the environment.

A waste that performs any one of the above actions when exposed to water must be assigned the characteristic of Reactivity.  Certain elements and substances, e.g. sodium and sodium azide, respectively are known to be water reactive and may be a reactive hazardous waste.  But note the use of subjective and undefined terms such as “violently” and “potentially explosive”.  Also, while the generation of toxic gases, vapors or fumes can be detected or known what can’t be determined from this characterization is what quantity is “sufficient to present a danger to human health or the environment”?  One possible tool for answering this question is to refer to the applicable worker exposure standards of the Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) for the gas, vapor, or fume generated.  If it is at or near the OSHA maximum exposure limit it may be sufficient to present a danger to human health or the environment(RO14636) (RO12249).

Cyanide or Sulfide Bearing:

It is a cyanide or sulfide bearing waste which, when exposed to pH conditions between 2 and 12.5, can generate toxic gases, vapors or fumes in a quantity sufficient to present a danger to human health or the environment.

To be a reactive hazardous waste due to this characteristic the waste must:

  • Contain either cyanide or sulfide (an inorganic anion of sulfur).  The quantity or concentration is not specified.

And…

  • When exposed to pH conditions between 2 and 12.5 – note that this pH range is not characteristic of a D002 corrosive hazardous wastewhich is a liquid with a pH of less than or equal to 2 or equal to or greater than 12.5. – generate dangerous levels of toxic gases, vapors, or fumes.

How can a generator determine a “quantity sufficient to present a danger to human health or the environment.”?

Well, in 1985 EPA provided interim guidance on determining these levels (Faxback 11091).  However, this guidance was withdrawn in 1998 and has not been replaced (Faxback 14177).  So it looks like you’re on your own.

Explosives:

It is capable of detonation or explosive reaction if it is subjected to a strong initiating source or if heated under confinement.

It is readily capable of detonation or explosive decomposition or reaction at standard temperature and pressure.

It is a forbidden explosive as defined in 49 CFR 173.54, or is a Division 1.1, 1.2 or 1.3 explosive as defined in 49 CFR 173.50 and 173.53.

Note the three separate definitions of an explosive.

1.  IT COULD EXPLODE IF TRIGGERED…

The first is merely “capable” of detonation (an explosion at faster than the speed of sound) or explosive reaction which is not quite the same as an explosion.  Further, the waste will only begin detonation or explosive reaction if it is subjected to a strong initiating force or heated under confinement.

So then, what about aerosol cans and other compressed gas cylinders?  Could they be a D003 reactive hazardous waste solely because of their capability of detonation or explosive reaction when heated or otherwise punctured?  The answer from EPA, surprising to me, was “maybe”.  In 1987 EPA stated that a discarded aerosol can is a reactive hazardous waste due solely to the propellent and not any other waste it contains (RO13027).  However, six years later in 1993 EPA refused to answer the question: “At this time, the Agency is not able to determine whether various types of cans that may have contained a wide range of products are reactive.”  The Agency went on to state that nearly empty steel aerosol cans are subject to the scrap metal exemption at 40 CFR 261.1(c)(6) and as such may even be punctured and drained without a permit (RO11782).

You may manage your hazardous waste aerosol cans under the scrap metal exemption.

My interpretation is that unless RCRA Empty, an aerosol can will – at a minimum – be a D003 reactive hazardous waste due to the contents or the propellant being under pressure and capable of detonation if exposed to…

a strong initiating source:

Or heated under confinement:

But as the generator you must determine for yourself if your non-empty aerosol cans display the characteristic of Reactivity.

Some states, such as California and Minnesota, allow non-empty aerosol cans to be managed as a universal waste.

But I may be wrong because even though EPA has refused to directly answer if aerosol cans are a reactive hazardous waste, it has stated that ammunition up to and including 0.50 caliber does not display the characteristic of Reactivity (RO 13712).  So, if ammunition is not a reactive hazardous waste due to its explosive nature perhaps aerosol cans aren’t either.

We have two more types of explosives to consider…

2.  MORE LIKELY TO EXPLODE WITHOUT A TRIGGER…

Another explosive characteristic is one that is “readily capable” of exploding at standard temperature and pressure.  Note that this is a much more reactive material since it is “readily capable” instead of just merely “capable” and it does not require heat or a strong initiating source.

3.  FORBIDDEN AND THE BIG BOOMERS…

And finally, it is a specified type of explosive as defined by the Hazardous Material Regulations of the USDOT/PHMSA.  So let’s take a look at them:

  • Explosives that are forbidden in transportation by USDOT/PHMSA are identified at 49 CFR 173.54.  They include but are not limited to nitroglycerin, loaded firearms and toy torpedoes.  Simply refer to this
  • 49 CFR 173.50 identifies the six different divisions of hazard class 1 Explosives regulated by the HMR.  The three divisions that will be a reactive hazardous waste upon disposal are the most dangerous:

(1) Division 1.1 consists of explosives that have a mass explosion hazard. A mass explosion is one which affects almost the entire load instantaneously.

(2) Division 1.2 consists of explosives that have a projection hazard but not a mass explosion hazard.

(3) Division 1.3 consists of explosives that have a fire hazard and either a minor blast hazard or a minor projection hazard or both, but not a mass explosion hazard.

UN0336, Fireworks
Consumer firework in Division 1.4 will likely not be a reactive hazardous waste when discarded

Most consumer fireworks are a Division 1.4 Explosive and therefore would not display the characteristic of Reactivity when discarded.

Note:  A consumer firework that is a Division 1.4 Explosive may not display the characteristic of Reactivity but it may be a hazardous waste due to other characteristics such as Toxicity.

Commercial fireworks (the kind you see at a big show) and military munitions will likely be classified as a Division 1.1, 1.2, or 1.3 and will therefore be a reactive hazardous waste if discarded unused.

49 CFR 173.53 does not identify any new explosives not already identified in §173.50.  Instead it cross-references the current classification system of hazard class and division with a format used by USDOT/PHMSA prior to January 1, 1991 and still used by some states or other regulatory agencies.  Example:

  • Division 1.1 = Class A explosives
  • Division 1.2 = Class A or Class B explosives
  • Division 1.3 = Class B Explosives
  • Division 1.4 = Class C explosives
  • Division 1.5 = Blasting agents
  • Division 1.6 = No applicable hazard class

Contact me with any questions you may have about the generation, identification, management, and disposal of hazardous waste

Daniels Training Services

815.821.1550

Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

If you’re looking for clear-cut thresholds or approved analytical methods for the determination of the characteristic of Reactivity, you won’t find it here.  The determination of a reactive hazardous waste relies heavily on your knowledge of the process generating and the waste itself at the point of generation.

Amendment to the Speculative Accumulation Provision Under the New Definition of Solid Waste Rule (2015 DSW)

Amendment to the Speculative Accumulation Provision Under the New Definition of Solid Waste Rule (2015 DSW)

In a Final Rule published January 13, 2015 in the Federal Register, USEPA amended the definition of solid waste it had enacted in 2008 (2008 DSW).  The Federal regulations of the 2015 DSW become effective July 13, 2015.  States with an authorized hazardous waste program are required to adopt the Federal Rule or create their own more strict regulations; how and when they do this is up to each state.

The purpose of this article is to explain the changes made to the speculative accumulation provision by the 2015 DSW. (more…)

Proper Disposal of a Hazardous Material: Is it a Hazardous Waste?

On February 2, 2015 an EHS Professional who had attended one of my Training Seminars contacted me with a question:

Dan, I attended your HazMat Employee & Hazardous Waste Training class last <<MONTH>> in <<CITY, STATE>>. I am hoping that you could help me out by advising me what to do with a 4 oz bottle of lacto phenol cotton blue stain that we just discovered hidden in a drawer in our laboratory.

According to SDS, it is approx. 80% phenol which is hazardous.
My question to you is how would you recommend handling this? I know we are allowed to keep small amounts on site. Would you safely package it up and store on site or would you go ahead and pay the cost of disposing it immediately?
Last year we went through the lab to clean out expired chemicals and did hire a company to dispose of all hazardous material but missed this bottle of stain.

I would greatly appreciate your advice.

My response on February 9, 2014:

I apologize for my delay in responding. I’ve been super busy the past few weeks.

To answer your question you have a few options, I have outlined some of them below along with some suggestions.

  • I would not be in any rush to call it a waste – and therefore a hazardous waste – too quickly. As the generator you have some discretion in deciding when it is a waste (i.e. when it is discarded) as long as it does not appear to be abandoned. As such, you could continue to keep it on the lab shelf with some plans in the near future to use it.
  • Is it possible to use it? If you can find some way to use it as a product in a legitimate manner, then it would not be discarded and would not be a waste. Perhaps your lab personnel could use it in some form of experiment that consumes the material leaving nothing but a RCRA Empty container which can then go in the trash.
  • If it becomes a waste, as the generator you have the option to treat a waste to make it non-hazardous. This can be done if the waste is hazardous due to a characteristic (D001, D002, D003, or D004-D043) but not if it is a listed hazardous waste (F-codes, K-codes, P-codes, U-codes). It sounds like what you have is a characteristic hazardous waste (D001 for Ignitability). You could therefore, mix it with a large amount of non-ignitable waste and make it non-hazardous. Or you could solidify it with absorbants and dispose of it as a non-hazardous waste.
  • If you are a CESQG and it is not a listed hazardous waste (see above) you could add it to your Used Oil and still manage it as a Used Oil.

In sum, you have a lot of options for the management of this material that does not require off-site transportation as a hazardous waste. Though of course that remains an option.

I hope this helps. Please don’t hesitate to contact me with any other questions.

Dan

EHS Professional replied:

Excellent information!  Thank you very much!

Daniels Training Services815.821.1550Info@DanielsTraining.com

https://www.danielstraining.com/

Mining Overburden – The RCRA Exclusion From Hazardous Waste at 40 CFR 261.4(b)(3)

What Counts When Counting Hazardous Waste?

If you discard anything from your home, business, or government office you are a generator of a solid waste.  As a generator of solid waste you are required to conduct a Hazardous Waste Determination to determine if your solid waste is subject to regulation – perhaps it is conditionally excluded from regulation as a hazardous waste if it is a Household Hazardous Waste – and what kind of hazardous waste it is (Listed, Characteristic, or both).

Note:

As of the effective date of the Generator Improvements Rule on May 30, 2017 the Federal regulations referenced in this article have changed.

The USEPA regulations for counting of hazardous waste to determine generator category are now found at 40 CFR 262.17(a)(7).

The regulations of your state may still refer to the original location of the Federal regulations.

I have written an article to address the new regulations for counting of hazardous waste and determination of generator category.

 

Once you have identified the hazardous waste you generate you are required to determine your hazardous waste generator status.  This is important since compliance with the RCRA regulations of the USEPA and your state will depend on your hazardous waste generator status.  It’s no surprise that the higher your hazardous waste generator status, the greater your regulatory burden.  The purpose of this article is to provide guidance in determining what wastes to consider and count when you are determining your hazardous waste generator status for the purpose of compliance with the RCRA regulations. (more…)