A question from a past Onsite Training customer (4.20.15):
Daniel,
I have a question. We need to ship out a sample approximately a quart of transformer oil which contains 550 ppm PCBs. If the material is below the RQ value (see enclosed letter), what type of labeling is required, or does it since it’s below the RQ value?
My reply that same day:
I will take a look at it and get back to you.
Turns out he didn’t need the information after all (4.20.15):
No problem, I found out that my lab can do the testing, so I don’t have to ship the material out.
Did that stop me? No! (April 22, 2015):
Not sure if you require this information any more, but here goes:
A PCB oil is only a hazardous materials subject to USDOT regulations in transportation if there is 1 lb or greater of PCBs in a single packaging. 1 quart at 550 ppm would be well below 1 lb of PCBs, therefore it is not a HazMat when transported.
A PCB oil of this concentration would be subject to TSCA regulations of which I am not very familiar.
I hope this helps.
Dan
Wait, how did you know that?
First of all, let’s look at the entry for PCBs in the Hazardous Materials Table (49 CFR 172.101):
So, you’d think that PCBs are a hazardous material when offered for transportation and that my response to my customer was wrong. But…you’d say that before looking up the meaning of Special Provision 140 in column 7, which reads:
This material is regulated only when it meets the defining criteria for a hazardous substance or a marine pollutant…
So, is it a marine pollutant?
PCBs are identified on the marine pollutant list at Appendix B to 49 CFR 172.101, but to be regulated as a marine pollutant it must also offered for transportation by vessel or transported in a bulk packaging, neither of which is the case here.
Is it a hazardous substance?
No, because a Reportable Quantity of PCBs is 1 pound, as I described in my email of 4.22.15, the volume of oil and concentration of PCBs put it well below this amount.
Contact me with any questions you may have about the transportation of hazardous materials by air, highway, vessel, or rail
There you have it. While the amount and concentration of PCB oil considered for transportation was not a hazardous material, a different packaging and volume might be. Be sure to carefully research the Hazardous Material Regulations of the PHMSA/USDOT before you send that sample to the lab.
Or, contact me to answer your questions or to provide HazMat Employee training.
Amendment to the Speculative Accumulation Provision Under the New Definition of Solid Waste Rule (2015 DSW)
In a Final Rule published January 13, 2015 in the Federal Register, USEPA amended the definition of solid waste it had enacted in 2008 (2008 DSW). The Federal regulations of the 2015 DSW become effective July 13, 2015. States with an authorized hazardous waste program are required to adopt the Federal Rule or create their own more strict regulations; how and when they do this is up to each state.
The purpose of this article is to explain the changes made to the speculative accumulation provision by the 2015 DSW. (more…)
Hazardous Materials Prohibited as Luggage on a Passenger Aircraft
If you travel by air as much as I do (that’s what Onsite Training requires), you’ve seen the signs forbidding the transportation of hazardous materials aboard passenger aircraft, either in checked baggage or carry-on. The purpose of this article is to identify the source of those signs, summarize the requirements of the regulations, and provide additional sources of information for the harried traveler. (more…)
Air Shipment of Samples with Ethanol
Not every question I receive comes from an industrial facility embedded on the outskirts of some major city or from a busy transportation hub in the nation’s heartland. Some, like this one on March 14th, 2015, come from exotic locations I can only hope to visit some day.
Hi Daniel,
I am currently on a research cruise and accumulated a large amount of samples preserved in 95% ethanol. By the end of the cruise I will have around 20 samples of 250 ml of ethanol for a total of 5L. The samples need to be shipped in dry ice (preferably by air) from San Diego to Hawaii. I was wondering if you knew of a way to do this. It clearly exceeds the excepted and limited quantity, and I don’t have access to a trained haz-mat officer at port.
Thank you in advance for your help.
You can tell I was impressed (3.14.15):
Wow! What an interesting question. I happen to be in the office today (it’s Saturday morning here in Illinois) so I will do my best to shoot you an answer later today.
Here’s what I sent to him later that day. (Yeah, I work Saturdays.):
First of all, I made the determination based on the available information that the ethanol is a Class 3, Packing Group II. Also, I assume you intend to ship this per the IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations even though the transportation you describe could be subject solely to PHMSA/USDOT regulations if you could find an air carrier that does not require compliance with the IATA DGR.
Note from Dan: The domestic transportation of a hazardous material is always subject to the Hazardous Material Regulations of the the PHMSA/USDOT. A domestic shipper of HazMat by air will likely also have to comply with the Dangerous Goods Regulations of IATA; this depends on your air carrier since most - but not all - require compliance with the IATA DGR. The international transportation of a HazMat (called dangerous goods) by air must comply with the IATA DGR. The direct transportation of a HazMat from San Diego, CA to Hawaii is not international transportation and therefore is only required to comply with the HMR unless the carrier requires compliance with the IATA DGR as well. Got it?
Based on that assumption and the information you provided, I agree with you that the total quantity of 5 L exceeds the limits for shipping Ethanol, PG II as a Limited Quantity (max net quantity of 1 L) and as an Excepted Quantity (max inner packaging of 30 g/30 ml and max outer packaging of 500 g/500 ml) and therefore may not take advantage of those exceptions. It is within the quantity limits for shipment as fully regulated dangerous good on a passenger aircraft and, of course, on cargo aircraft.
Special Provision A180 (Column M of the List of Dangerous Goods) reads as follows:
A180 Non-infectious specimens, such as specimens of mammals, birds, amphibians, reptiles, fish, insects and other invertebrates containing small quantities of UN 1170, UN 1198, UN 1987, or UN 1219 are not subject to these Regulations provided the following packing and marking requirements are met:
(a) specimens are:
1. wrapped in paper towel and/or cheesecloth moistened with alcohol or an alcohol solution and then placed in a plastic bag that is heat-sealed. Any free liquid in the bag must not exceed 30 mL; or
2. placed in vials or other rigid containers with no more than 30 mL of alcohol or an alcohol solution;
(b) the prepared specimens are then placed in a plastic bag that is then heat–sealed;
(c) the bagged specimens are then placed inside a another plastic bag with absorbent material then heat sealed;
(d) the finished bag is then placed in a strong outer packaging with suitable cushioning material;
(e) the total quantity of flammable liquid per outer packaging must not exceed 1 L; and
(f) the completed package is marked “scientific research specimens, not restricted Special Provision A180 applies”.
The words “not restricted” and the special provision number A180 must be included in the description of the substance on the Air Waybill as required by 8.2.6, when an Air Waybill is issued.
Note here that the total quantity of flammable liquid per outer packaging cannot exceed 1 L which is less than your proposed total quantity of 5 L and the max allowed quantity of ethanol inside the package is 30 mL which also exceeds your 250 mL/vial.
It appears that you will be required to ship the samples as a dangerous good subject to full regulation under the IATA DGR unless you can reduce the size of both the inner and outer packaging.
Also, must follow packing instruction 954 for the Dry Ice.
I wish I had better news for you. If you could just collect smaller samples, they might not be subject to the regulations and then the dry ice would not be either.
As for shipping it as a dangerous good, that should not be too difficult. Contact Fed Ex or UPS.
Please don’t hesitate to contact me with any other questions.
He fired back on March 16th:
Hi Daniel, I apologize for the ongoing requests for advice.So would it help if I don’t use dry ice AND reduce the sample volume
from 250ml of ethanol per bottle to 30ml of ethanol per vial?How would I have to pack this then? Can I place 30 vials with 30ml
ethanol in a bag with absorbent material, then place the bag into a
box, and then place that box into another box that is aligned with
absorbent material and a plastic bag?
Thank you for your help.
A quick reply the same day:
If you are able to reduce the volume of ethanol in each vial to 30 ml and you don’t use dry ice, then I believe your best option is to meet the packaging requirements of Special Provision A180 (read them carefully, what you propose is not quite what the regulations require). If you are able to do this, then your consignment is not subject to the Dangerous Goods regulations of IATA.
A problem I just discovered is that – based on a quick review of the regulations – USDOT does not recognize the same Special Provision for UN1170 as IATA. It appears that even at 30 ml/vial you would need to ship it as a Limited Quantity which provides some relief from the HazMat regulations, but not as much as SP 180 offers. If you are shipping to, from, or w/i the U.S. you must comply with USDOT regulations.
I don’t mind the questions, keep them coming.
Whatever you decide, please keep me in mind the next time you need HazMat/IATA/IMO training.
Some more information was needed (3.17.15):
Hi Daniel,
thank you for the detailed answer. I really appreciate it.
Ok, so what are the packing regulations for Limited Quantity (30mL vials for up to 1L)? I hate to ask these trivial things, but the internet in the middle of the Pacific is not the greatest and hence it is quite hard to google these things.
This cruise is called ABYSSLINE cruise and its onboard the R/V Thomas Thompson. We have 3 different cruise blogs:
You can also follow all the activities under the twitter hashtag #AB02
We are currently at 12deg 01.642′ N , 117deg 19.513′ W.
Thanks for the help.
My reply that same day:
Packaging requirements for a Limited Quantity of ethanol can be found at 49 CFR 173.150 and are fairly simple:
Non-bulk packaging (i.e. <119 gallons).
Combination packaging (i.e. inner packaging and outer packaging).
“strong outer packaging”
Limits on volume of inner packaging based on packing group of HazMat.
Shipment by air has additional general packing requirements.
Shipment by air requires labels and markings in addition to Limited Quantity marking.
However, you will likely also have to comply with requirements of IATA Dangerous Goods Regulations (depending on the requirements of your air carrier). I have access to those regulations but cannot print and send them as I can the USDOT. IATA regulations are similar to USDOT but may have more restrictions and may also have Carrier variations not included in USDOT.
I am sharing this email with someone (Ron Harvey of Echelon Environmental) who may be able to help you out with the actual shipment of this HazMat.
Thanks for the information about your cruise.
And that’s where my involvement ended. My inquisitor contacted Ron who assisted him through the final steps of packaging and shipping the hazardous material/dangerous good.
Contact me with any questions you may have about the transportation of hazardous materials by air, highway, vessel, or rail
Please don’t hesitate to contact me with your questions about the transportation of dangerous goods/hazardous materials.
State Authorization and the 2015 Definition of Solid Waste Regulations
Under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), USEPA will allow a state to operate its own hazardous waste program as long as it is at least as stringent and as broad as the Federal regulations. A state with a hazardous waste program that meets these requirements is known as “Authorized”. This means that states with an authorized hazardous waste program may not immediately – or at all – adopt regulations created by the USEPA unless new Federal regulations are more stringent and/or broad than those existing. In the case of more strict Federal regulations, states must adopt them, but may do so on their own schedule. Not surprisingly, this flexibility can create a patchwork of differing Federal and state RCRA regulations spreading across the U.S. like a quilt.
The purpose of this article is to explain how state authorization will impact implementation of the Federal regulations created by the 2015 Definition of Solid Waste Rule (2015 DSW). (more…)
Safe Transportation of Energy Products (STEP) by USDOT/PHMSA
In response to recent accidents involving crude oil shipments by rail in the U.S. and Canada, U.S. Transportation Secretary Anthony Foxx has issued a “Call to Action,” calling on rail company executives, associations, shippers, and others to discuss how stakeholders can prevent or mitigate the consequences of rail accidents that involve flammable liquids.
Railroad Tank Cars of Bakken Crude Oil passing through Illinois
The following companies have voluntarily submitted testing data to the US Department of Transportation in response. The information shared consists of data gathered from samples of petroleum crude oil from the Bakken region of North Dakota. We will continue to post updates as more companies respond to the Department’s industry-wide effort aimed at enhancing the safe transport of flammable liquids by rail.
Company Name
Date Received
Number of Samples
Notes
WPX Energy
5/29/2014
16
Tested for RVP, FP, BP, API, chemical breakdown of light ends, benzene content.
EOG Resources
5/27/2014
35
Tested for RVP, FP, BP, H2S.
North Dakota
Petroleum Council
5/17/2014
152
Tested for RVP, FP, BP, API Specific Gravity, chemical breakdown of light ends, H2S.
American Fuel &
Petrochemical
Manufacturers
5/14/2014
1,400
Tested for RVP, FP, BP, rail tank car pressure, chemical breakdown of light ends, H2S, corrosivity.
Statoil & Gas
5/13/2014
43
Tested for RVP, FP, BP, API Specific Gravity, sulfur content, H2S.
Phillips 66
5/09/2014
16
Tested for FP, BP, API Specific Gravity, sulfur content, sediment & water content, TVP, RVP, H2S, chemical breakdown of light ends.
Great Northern Midstream
5/08/2014
10
Tested for FP, BP, H2S, chemical breakdown of light ends, Benzene.
ExxonMobil
4/17/2014
15
Tested for density, H2S, FP, BP, RVP and chemical breakdown of light ends, benzene content.
Continental Resources
3/18/2014
1
Tested for API Specific Gravity, sulfur content, RVP, ethane, propane and butane.
Plains All American
3/11/2014
24
Tested for FP, BP, API Specific Gravity, sulfur content, RVP.
Savage
2/28/2014
12
Tested for FP, BP, RVP, and sulfur content.
Notes:
H2S = Hydrogen Sulfide; BP = Boiling Point
FP = Flash Point
RVP = Reid Vapor Pressure
API = American Petroleum Institute
TVP = True Vapor Pressure
Contact me with any questions you may have about the transportation of hazardous materials by air, highway, vessel, or rail
New Regulations! Announcements in the Federal Register for May 2015 From USEPA (RCRA only) and HazMat Transportation Issues of the FAA, FMCSA, FRA, & PHMSA
On its website the US Government Printing Office makes a wealth of Federal publications available for review and download; one of these is the Federal Register.
The Federal Register is the tool used by the US Government to communicate with interested parties
Published by the Office of the Federal Register, National Archives and Records Administration (NARA), the Federal Register is the official daily publication for rules, proposed rules, and notices of Federal agencies and organizations, as well as executive orders and other presidential documents.
See below for a brief summary of announcements in the Federal Register by the US EPA on the subject of Hazardous Waste and the Pipeline & Hazardous Materials Safety Administration (PHMSA), Federal Railroad Administration (FRA), and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) of the US DOT on the subject of Transportation of Hazardous Materials.
The Federal Register is a great way to look down the road and see potential changes to the regulations long before they are put into effect (sometimes The Rulemaking Process takes years before a final rule is issued, if ever). Knowledge of these potential changes provides you with several advantages:
Additional time to modify your business operations to comply.
Awareness of on what topics the regulatory agencies intend to focus their efforts.
The ability to register your concerns, complaints, suggestions, etc. in order to modify the proposed rule before a final rule is issued. It can be done, really!
Make changes to your training program to account for changes that become effective before the next training cycle.
Alert you to the need to re-train your employees prior to their next scheduled training cycle, if necessary.
Keep you abreast of changes to the regulations that affect your business and/or your industry group.
Please note that this is my best effort to identify the relevant announcements in the Federal Register that may be of interest to generators of hazardous waste and shippers of hazardous materials. I encourage you to review the list of Federal Register publications yourself to ensure regulatory compliance.
May 1, 2015 through May 31, 2015
USEPA – US Environmental Protection Agency:
Publications not related to the management of hazardous waste, solid waste, universal waste, or used oil are not included here.
Rules and Regulations:
None
Proposed Rules:
None
Contact me with any questions you may have about the management of hazardous waste
Publications not related to the transportation of hazardous materials are not included here.
Rules and Regulations:
None
Proposed Rules:
None
Notices:
None
FMCSA – Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration:
Publications not related to the transportation of hazardous materials are not included here.
Rules and Regulations:
None
Proposed Rules:
None
Notices:
None
FRA – Federal Railroad Administration:
Publications not related to the transportation of hazardous materials are not included here.
Rules and Regulations:
None
Proposed Rules:
None
Notices:
Railroad Safety Advisory Committee; Notice of Meeting Pages 26988 – 26988 [FR DOC # 2015-11269] PDF | Text | More
Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request Pages 30109 – 30110 [FR DOC # 2015-12579] PDF | Text | More
Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request Pages 30110 – 30112 [FR DOC # 2015-12584] PDF | Text | More
Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request Pages 30112 – 30113 [FR DOC # 2015-12578] PDF | Text | More
Proposed Agency Information Collection Activities; Comment Request Pages 30113 – 30114 [FR DOC # 2015-12580] PDF | Text | More
PHMSA – Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration:
Publications not related to the transportation of hazardous materials are not included here.
Rules and Regulations:
Hazardous Materials: Enhanced Tank Car Standards and Operational Controls for High-Hazard Flammable Trains Pages 26643 – 26750 [FR DOC # 2015-10670] PDF | Text | More
Proposed Rules:
None
Notices:
International Standards on the Transport of Dangerous Goods Pages 26617 – 26618 [FR DOC # 2015-11104] PDF | Text | More
Hazardous Materials: Information Collection Activities Pages 27844 – 27845 [FR DOC # 2015-11625] PDF | Text | More
Hazardous Materials: Notice of Application for Special Permits Pages 29156 – 29157 [FR DOC # 2015-11817] PDF | Text | More
Hazardous Materials: Notice of Application for Modification of Special Permit Pages 29157 – 29158 [FR DOC # 2015-11825] PDF | Text | More
Hazardous Materials: Delayed Applications Pages 29387 – 29388 [FR DOC # 2015-11815] PDF | Text | More
Hazardous Materials: Actions on Special Permit Applications Pages 29388 – 29389 [FR DOC # 2015-11827] PDF | Text | More
Information can be helpful but it’s useless if you are not able to make sense of it. You must be able to determine how any changes to the rules and regulations (final or proposed) will affect your operations, and communicate the necessary information to your personnel. I can help you to do that.
Contact me with any questions you may have about the transportation of hazardous materials by air, highway, vessel, or rail
Please contact me for a free training consultation to determine your regulatory requirements and how training can help you to attain and maintain compliance with the regulations of the US Environmental Protection Agency (and your state) and the PHMSA, FAA, FRA, & FMCSA of the US Department of Transportation.
Sample Video: HazMat Employee Training Webinar
If you’ve ever considered registering for one of my HazMat Employee Training Webinars but decided against it because of past poor experiences, I encourage you to take just 3.5 minutes to view this short video clip I recorded from a HazMat Employee Training Webinar I conducted on May 11, 2015.
It’s nowhere near the full training, but this short segment will – I believe – demonstrate to you that my live, interactive (you can ask questions at any time) webinars will meet your regulatory training requirements in a fast (3 hours), efficient (scheduled 1/month right at your desk), and cost-effective (only $189/person) manner.
Proper Transportation of a 2,000 Pound Battery for Reclamation
FEBRUARY 26, 2015: A QUESTION FROM A PREVIOUS ATTENDEE OF ONE OF MY TRAINING SEMINARS:
I had a question come up about transporting batteries to a recycle vendor. A 2000 lb lead acid battery that is on one of my trucks going to a scrapper. What is required. Are you going to need a placard on the truck and label on the battery as corrosive along with the paperwork or is it an ORM-D? How does DOT view this type of load?
MY REPLY ON MARCH 2ND (I WAS BUSY!):
Sorry for the delay in replying. I can get you an answer, but I need some more information: Please clarify what you mean by “on one of my trucks going to a scrapper.” Is this battery still connected to a vehicle? Is the vehicle gas-powered (gasoline)? How will it be transported? In a vehicle? On a vehicle? Towed by a vehicle?
Please advise on the above and I can get you an answer.
CUSTOMER REPLIED (3.3.15):
One of our trucks from our distribution center, a 53’ trailer semi, was transporting a bad forklift battery to a scrap vendor. The battery was skidded up and packed correctly according to DOT regs. It was going via semi, over highway, to the scrap vendor. Essentially its an ORM-D for recycle so you’re outside of RCRA.
MY QUICK REPLY ON MARCH 3RD:
You are correct on several counts and should be in compliance with DOT & EPA regulations overall. Some clarification:
A lead acid battery of the type you describe is a hazardous material per DOT regulations when offered for transportation.
A battery of this size is not subject to the ORM-D Exception.
Pursuant to DOT regs [49 CFR 173.159(d)] authorized packaging for shipping a battery of this type includes “secured to skids or pallets”. Other basic packaging requirements must be met.
DOT regs [49 CFR 173.159(e)] include an exception from full regulation as a hazardous material for batteries of this type if they are secured properly and other basic requirements are met. Therefore, no shipping papers, placards, labels, or markings as a hazardous material are required.
A lead acid battery sent for recycling is a hazardous waste pursuant to the regulations of the EPA.
However, an exclusion exists for a Recyclable Material as a lead acid battery if it is sent for reclamation (40 CFR 266, Subpart G). Per this exclusion a lead acid battery sent for reclamation is not subject to the regulations as a hazardous waste. This exclusion does not apply if the battery is sent for disposal other than reclamation.
I hope this helps. Please don’t hesitate to contact me with any questions.
Do you have questions about the transportation of batteries with vehicles being sent for scrap? Ask me!
Revised Hazardous Waste Fees and NEW Solid Waste Fees in Nevada
The Nevada Department of Environmental Regulation (NDEEP) adopted new regulations on October 24, 2014, revising its hazardous waste fees and authorizing new solid waste fees. Below are links to summary sheets outlining the revised and new fee structures each containing links to the adopted regulations:
Be sure to pay your hazardous waste fees to the NDEP!