Posts Tagged RCRA

The History of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act

In the beginning…there was unregulated disposal of waste generated by commercial and industrial facilities, both public and private.  Today there are the hazardous waste regulations written and enforced by the US Environmental Protection Agency and individual states if they have an approved hazardous waste program.  So, what was life like for what we now refer to as the “Regulated Community” before their were regulations?  Pretty simple for them, but not so good for the environment.

A common industry practice in those days was to dispose of hazardous waste onsite by burying, burning, or indefinite storage or have it shipped offsite for something similar.  In either case records were not required nor kept.  Not only did this cause damage to the environment, but the lack of recordkeeping made it impossible for property owners to know what, if any, pollutants were on their property due to past activities.

One cause of this pollution is a flaw in capitalism – a system I love – known as the Tragedy of the Commons.  Basically the cost for damage to the environment caused by a polluter were borne by all instead of just the polluter.  Thus an incentive for polluters to dispose of waste in the cheapest and the least environmentally-friendly manner possible:  open dumping.

Another cause was that the regulation of waste was not thought to be the responsibility of the Federal government and was left to state and local government.  This resulted in an inconsistent patchwork of regulations throughout the country.  The inter-state transportation of hazardous waste, not to mention the ability of pollutants to cross borders on their own, made effective regulation impossible.

A factor that exacerbated the situation was the increase in the volume and toxicity of waste generated starting in the 1960′s.  Note the following statistics from 25 Years of RCRA:  Building on our Past to Protect our Future:

  • In the decade between 1950 and 1960, the amount of trash individuals created increased 60 percent.
  • In 1965, more than four million chemicals were being produced in the U.S. and synthetic chemical manufacturing
    was on the rise.

By the 1960′s it was clear that something had to change.

This resulted in the 1965 passage of the Solid Waste Disposal Act (SWDA).  The SWDA did not emphasize the regulation of waste throughout its lifecycle, but instead focused on training and research as a means to identify methods to manage waste.  It did, however, set minimum standards for local landfills.  It had little to no effect on generators of hazardous waste.

The SWDA was amended in 1970 by the Resource Recovery Act (RRA).  The RRA emphasized the recovery of energy and materials from solid waste over disposal.  Even with this amendment the regulations were still nothing like we know them today.  For example:  open dumping of waste was not yet banned, companies did not have “Cradle to Grave” responsibility for the hazardous waste they generated, and there was no permit program for hazardous waste generators, transporters, or disposal facilities.

All of that changed in 1976 with the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) which was merely an amendment to the SWDA of 1965, and has been amended itself many times since.  However, due to the sweeping nature of the changes it introduced it remains synonymous with the regulation of hazardous waste in the United States.  With RCRA, for the first time the generation, transportation, and disposal of hazardous waste came fully under Federal regulations (and state regulations if the state was authorized to manage RCRA) and open dumping of waste was to be banned by 1983.

 Read the EPA Press Release – December 13, 1976.  Broadly speaking RCRA’s goals were and are:

  • To protect human health and the environment from the potential hazards of waste disposal.
  • To conserve energy and natural resources.
  • To reduce the amount of waste generated.
  • To ensure that wastes are managed in an environmentally sound manner.

RCRA is legislation; it is not regulation.  It did however authorize the US EPA (created in 1970) to draft the regulations to realize the goals of RCRA.  Though not the first regulations to come from RCRA, it is the “Hazardous Waste and Consolidated Permit Regulations,” published in the Federal Register on May 19, 1980 (45 FR 33066; May 19, 1980), which established the basic Cradle to Grave approach to hazardous waste management so familiar to all of us today.

“But wait!” You say, “What were the requirements for a hazardous waste generator from December 13, 1976 – when RCRA was signed into law – to May 19, 1980 when the first hazardous waste regulations were published?”  I’m no lawyer, but the best I could determine is that during the period between when RCRA was passed and the regulations were written a generator, TSDF, and/or transporter of hazardous waste need only comply with the regulations in affect at that time:  those created by the the Solid Waste Disposal Act of 1965.  In other words:  “Not much”.  Of course, some states and municipalities had out-paced the US EPA and had their own regulations in place well before the RCRA regulations were codified.  An example of this is the state of California which passed its Hazardous Waste Control Law in 1972.  The HWCL served as a model for RCRA passed four years later and to this day California’s hazardous waste regulations are much more strict and broad than those of the US EPA.

Post-RCRA:

RCRA has been amended many times since its inception, each resulting in a change to the hazardous waste regulations in the CFR.  Some amendments were additions, clarifications, and corrections of typographical errors.  Others resulted in significant changes to the regulations and affected a large number of the regulated industry.  A full description of these amendments will need to wait for a future article.  In brief, however, amendments to RCRA are as follows:

Used Oil Recycling Act of 1980 - Intended to encourage the recycling of Used Oil by exempting if from regulation as a hazardous waste if certain requirements are met.

Solid Waste Disposal Act Amendments of 1980 – Intended to provide US EPA with greater enforcement authority over illegal dumping of hazardous waste.  It also created a category of large-volume wastes thought to be low-toxicity that were excluded from definition as a hazardous waste and would be categorized as Special Waste.

Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984 – These 1984 amendments made the most substantial additions to the program by significantly expanding RCRA’s coverage and requirements for hazardous industrial wastes.

Medical Waste Tracking Act of 1988 - In effect for a limited time (expired in 1991) and for a limited area (4 eastern states and Puerto Rico).  The regulation of medical waste is currently the responsibility of the states.

Federal Facility Compliance Act of 1992  - Strengthened enforcement of RCRA at Federal facilities.

Land Disposal Program Flexibility Act of 1996 - provided regulatory flexibility for land disposal of certain wastes.

Read more: http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/encyclopedia/Res-Sec/Resource-Conservation-and-Recovery-Act.html#ixzz2Irh6TYoz

Nothing in this article may cause you to substantially change the way you manage hazardous waste.  However, knowing the history of the regulations can help to form a broad understanding of where we’ve been and – more importantly – where we’re going as a regulated community.  That is why I always include a brief history of US EPA & RCRA in my training.  Whether it’s through legislation, interpretation, or enforcement, RCRA is always changing.  Make sure your training addresses these changes so you can maintain compliance.

Tags: , , , , ,

Free Stuff From the US EPA – RCRA in Focus

Contrary to what you may believe, the US EPA is not all about enforcement.  Part of US EPA’s mission is to provide information to the regulated community in the form of guidance documents whose purpose is to summarize the regulations in plain English and indicate sources of additional information.

When referring to a guidance document it is important to keep the following in mind:

  • No guidance document – even one published by the US EPA – is a substitute for the regulations.  A good guidance document may only provide an overview of the regulations, if you find some of its information useful you must research the regulations to determine compliance.
  • The regulations may have changed since the guidance document was written.
  • If the document is issued by the US EPA you may have to confirm the information with your state environmental agency.  All states except for Iowa, Alaska, & Puerto Rico have approved hazardous waste programs under RCRA and will write and enforce their own regulations.  These states will have their own guidance documents to explain their regulations.

An example of a series of very helpful guidance documents issued by US EPA is the RCRA in Focus series.  From the website:

RCRA in Focus is a series of publications providing an overview of the RCRA regulations affecting specific industry sectors. Intended as a guide for small businesses, RIF presents the lifecycle of a typical waste for each industry and focuses on recycling and pollution prevention options. Each issue contains a hazardous waste table of RCRA requirements for small businesses and answers frequently asked questions.

Industry for which RCRA in Focus publications are available:

Guidance documents are available for download as a pdf or you may order copies through the mail (limit to ten different publications and one of each per day).

Publications like these can be a great asset in maintaining compliance with the hazardous waste regulations of the US EPA and your state, especially if you are one of the industry listed above.  Also helpful is training.  Contact me for a free consultation on your training needs.

Tags: , ,

Maryland Air National Guard Settles Hazardous Waste Violations at Baltimore Facility

PHILADELPHIA (Oct. 18, 2012) – In a consent agreement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the Maryland Air National Guard (MDANG), 175th Wing, has agreed to pay a $75,000 penalty to settle alleged violations of hazardous waste regulations at its facility at 2701 Eastern Blvd., Baltimore, Md.

EPA cited MDANG for violating the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), the federal law governing the treatment, storage, and disposal of hazardous waste. RCRA is designed to protect public health and the environment, and avoid costly cleanups, by requiring the safe, environmentally sound storage and disposal of hazardous waste.

The consent agreement resolves alleged violations discovered in an April 2011 inspection of the facility. According to EPA, MDANG stored hazardous waste for more than 90 days without a RCRA hazardous waste permit or interim status, failed to provide annual hazardous waste training to some of its employees for a three-year period, and violated RCRA rules on labeling and recordkeeping. The wastes involved in these alleged violations include lubricants, paints, sealants, cleaning solutions and adhesive wastes. These wastes are hazardous because they exhibited the characteristics of being ignitable, corrosive or toxic due to chromium, methyl ethyl ketone or other compounds.

The settlement penalty reflects the MDANG’s compliance efforts, and its cooperation with EPA in the resolution of this matter. As part of the settlement, MDANG has neither admitted nor denied liability for the alleged violations, but has certified its compliance with applicable RCRA requirements.

Compliance with the RCRA regulations begins with training.  Contact me to learn just what training you need to ensure this doesn’t happen to you.

Tags: ,

Alaskan Municipality Fined for Hazardous Waste Violations

Contact Information: Hanady Kader, EPA Public Affairs, 206-553-0454, kader.hanady@epa.gov Jack Boller, EPA RCRA Unit, 206-553-2953, boller.jack@epa.gov

(Seattle—Sept. 14, 2012) The Kenai Peninsula Borough has agreed to construct a building to store hazardous waste following violations of federal waste management rules at its maintenance facility in Soldotna, Alaska, according to a settlement with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

“Proper hazardous waste management prevents costly, dangerous spills and keeps communities safe,” said Scott Downey, Manager of the Hazardous Waste Compliance Unit in EPA’s Seattle office. “We’re glad that the shop will soon have a building where it can manage hazardous waste more effectively.”

An EPA inspection in 2009 identified hazardous waste violations. The facility failed to determine if waste it was managing was hazardous waste, and failed to label containers of hazardous waste and used oil waste. The substances included paint thinners, kerosene and a mix of solvent and anti-freeze. The improperly labeled containers ranged in size from two-gallon containers to a 300-gallon tank.

The borough offered to construct the building to store hazardous waste as a way to mitigate the penalty EPA sought to address the violations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. Under the settlement, the borough will construct and operate the building and pay a penalty of nearly $12,800.

Good training, my training, serves several purposes.  It will fulfill the training requirements of the US EPA for large quantity generators of hazardous waste and it will inform you of the applicable regulations and what you must do to maintain compliance.  Good training, my training, will reduce or eliminate the potential for this type of violations and fines.  Contact me to determine the kind of training that is right for you.

Tags: , ,

Managing Aerosol Cans Under the RCRA Scrap Metal Exemption

If your operations generate empty – or nearly empty – aerosol cans as a waste you must be aware of your requirements as a generator of hazardous waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).  First of all, you must be aware that unless the aerosol cans meet the definition of RCRA Empty found at 40 CFR 261.7 it is subject to the requirement to perform a hazardous waste determination per 40 CFR 262.11.  This determination may very well reveal that your aerosol cans are a characteristic hazardous waste for Ignitability or Reactivity, or perhaps a listed hazardous waste.  Don’t panic however, RCRA includes an exemption from full regulation that can include your aerosol cans, if managed properly.

The key is the Scrap Metal Exemption found at 40 CFR 261.6(a)(3)(ii).   The exemption exists because EPA believes that some wastes – even hazardous wastes – pose a lower risk to the environment when recycled.  The exemption allows for certain recycled hazardous materials (known as “recyclable materials”) to be released from full regulation as a hazardous waste under Subtitle C of RCRA.

Scrap metal is a solid waste when disposed of or recycled.  However, if recycled (ie. reclaimed to recover a usable product), the Scrap Metal Exemption can be used to exempt it from regulation as a hazardous waste.  What, therefore, is a scrap metal?  Defined at 40 CFR 261.1(c)(6) as, “bits and peices of metal parts (e.g., bars, turnings, rods, sheets, wire) or metal pieces that may be combined together with bolts or soldering (e.g., radiators, scrap automobiles, railroad box cars), which when worn or superfluous can be recycled.”  Some key points of the definition:

  • “Bits and pieces of metal parts” or metal pieces combined to make manufactured articles.  It does not include dusts, fines, or sludges.
  • Must be “worn or superfluous”, ie. no longer fit for use.
  • “Can be recycled”.  It must be acceptable to a recycler.

Many items may fit into this definition, one of them is a steel aerosol can; with or without the residue of a liquid or a compressed gas.  If applicable, the scrap metal exemption allows you to accumulate, store, empty, puncture, and drain your steel aerosol cans as part of the recycling process exempt from RCRA regulation.  EPA does not regulate this exempt recycling process, but it does recommend you…

  • Empty the aerosols in a safe manner and in a way that protects the environment.  This means don’t brace the can and whack it with a hammer and nail (I’ve seen it done) or throw it into a bonfire for kicks (don’t get any ideas).
  • Capture the compressed gases and any liquid residue.  The liquid residue will likely be a hazardous waste for Ignitability and possibly for a listed hazardous waste.  If a filter is used to capture the released compressed gases, that will be subject to a hazardous waste determination as well.

A good way to meet the EPA recommendations is to purchase an aerosol can puncture device and install it on a DOT-Approved container.  Follow the manufacturer’s instructions for use of the device, and manage the container as a satellite accumulation area for hazardous waste.

The above is based on the US EPA Federal regulations.  Your State, county, or municipality may have regulations addressing the handling and disposal of aerosol cans.  Also, your scrap metal recycler should be informed of your actions.

Not only does my RCRA Training meet the regulatory requirements for large quantity generators of hazardous waste, it also contains information that you can apply in your day-to-day operations to maintain compliance.  But RCRA Training is only half of what I do, I also provide HazMat Employee Training required by the US DOT.  Contact me for a free consultation on your training needs.

Tags: , , ,

RCRA Training is the Solution for South Carolina Company Facing EPA Fines for Hazardous Waste Violations

Sumter Coatings, Inc. (SCI) in Sumter, SC must pay a $55,000 civil penalty as part of a settlement with the US Environmental Protection Agency for violations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) regulations discovered at its facility during a joint US EPA & SC Department of Health and Environment inspection (press release).  Alleged violations of the hazardous waste regulations include:

  • Improper management of hazardous waste containers on site;
  • Failure to provide a sufficient base beneath containers which held hazardous waste;
  • Failure to make a hazardous waste determination;
  • Failure to inspect all areas where hazardous waste containers are stored weekly;
  • Failure to develop personnel training program to ensure compliance with hazardous waste regulations;
  • Failure to update information contained in the contingency plan, along with failing to make arrangements with local police and hospital authorities regarding the contingency plan and submitting copies of the contingency plan to first responders.
Along with the civil penalty noted above, the EPA also required the company to develop a personnel training program, develop a schedule for implementation of the training program, and identify facility employees that require training.

It is sadly ironic that yet another company is developing a training program under the shadow of an enforcement action when proactive implementation of RCRA training could have precluded the violations from occurring in the first place.  Hazardous waste training is required for all personnel of a large quantity generator who handle, manage, generate, work around, treat, recycle, etc. hazardous waste and is highly recommended for similar employees of small quantity generators.  In addition to being a regulatory requirement, it is also a good way for you and your personnel to maintain compliance with the full array of hazardous waste regulations applicable to your operations.

I can provide RCRA Training and DOT HazMat Employee training in a variety of formats and locations; either at my open enrollment events held nationwide and year round, or right at your facility with on-site training tailored to your site-specific needs.  Please review my training schedule to find a date and location convenient to you, or contact me for a free training consultation.

Tags: , , ,

EPA Mapping Tool Improves Public Access to Enforcement Actions Under RCRA, CWA, CAA, & Others

Last year EPA announced the launch of a new mapping feature within its Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO) database.  Updated monthly, it includes information on enforcement actions – undertaken by EPA at the Federal level or by authorized State environmental agencies – against businesses like yours.  This new feature is part of the EPA’s ongoing effort to improve transparency and include more parties in maintaining regulatory compliance and protecting the environment.

The result of this “transparency” is that businesses such as yours must prepare to address – and be addressed by – a general public and other interested parties who now have ready access to critical information about your facility’s compliance status.  All enforcement actions undertaken by State and Federal agencies are included.  The data may be searched by year, media (air, water, waste, or multiple), by State, or other criteria.  The mapping tool also allows users to focus on specific facilities and view:

  • Facility name.
  • Applicable environmental statute with potential violation.
  • Link to detailed information about the facility’s compliance status on the ECHO database.

What does this mean for you?  Now more than ever, enforcement actions against your company are “Public Knowledge”.  Once an applicable action is taken by a State or Federal agency, there is no way to prevent it quickly becoming available to neighbors, concerned citizens, media, environmental groups, and your competitors.  The best way to prevent this kind of stain on your company image is to preclude the necessity for an enforcement action in the first place.

Maintain compliance with all State and Federal regulations.  Begin by ensuring any employees who generate, manage, or handle hazardous waste receive annual RCRA (aka: Hazardous Waste Personnel) Training.  It is also likely that you have employees that require the DOT’s HazMat Employee training.  I can provide both of those trainings at a reasonable price and at a location convenient for you.  Review my open enrollment training schedule, and my prices, or contact me about on-site training.

Tags: , , , ,

RCRA State Authorization

The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), signed into law in 1976, tasked the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to draft and enforce the regulations that form the Federal program based on the Act.  RCRA authorized EPA to delegate the primary responsibility of implementing the hazardous waste program to States and Territories with approved programs.  To achieve approved program status (aka:  RCRA Authorization), a States’ program must be substantially equivalent to, consistent with, and no less stringent than the Federal program.

What this means is that a State with a business-friendly agenda can’t take the EPA regulations and water them down as a gift to hazardous waste generators within their borders.  A more common occurrence is a State will go beyond the Federal program to be more strict and more broad in its regulation of hazardous waste.  Examples of this include:

  • Annual hazardous waste reports instead of biennial.
  • State-specific forms required for the Notification of Regulated Waste Activity.
  • State-specific listed and characteristic hazardous waste.
  • Containment requirements for hazardous waste Central Accumulation Areas at un-permitted hazardous waste generators – US EPA requires containment for permitted facilities only.
  • Time limits for accumulation for hazardous waste in Satellite Accumulation Areas.

So, does your State have RCRA Authorization?  Unless your located in Iowa, Alaska, or Puerto Rico, the answer is yes.  These two States and the Commonwealth lack authorization for a State RCRA program and defer to their US EPA Regional authority (Region 7, 10, & 1, respectively).  Anywhere else, and you must look to your State environmental agency as the primary source of RCRA regulation and enforcement; currently 50 States and Territories (what up Guam!) have RCRA Authorization.

If you haven’t already, take the time to learn more about your State environmental agency and your state-specific regulations; three good sources are:

  1. EPA RCRA Authorization homepage
  2. EPA Summary of State Programs
  3. RCRA/Hazardous Waste Resource Locator provided by ENVCAP

My RCRA open enrollment RCRA training covers the Federal regulations, but where applicable I indicate the areas where the States frequently differ and provide State-specific information if available.  If you really wish for me to drill down to the State regulations and how they apply to your operations, I suggest my on-site training for one low flat fee.  With on-site training, I work with you to provide exactly the training you need at your facility to maintain compliance with Federal and State regulations.  My training also meets the HazMat Employee training requirements of the Department of Transportation.

Please contact me for a free consultation to determine which regulations apply to your operations and what training is right for you.

Tags: , ,

Significant Hazardous Waste Penalties and Fines for Another Company

PHILADELPHIA (March 8, 2012) – Ellwood Quality Steels Company has agreed to pay a $150,000 penalty to settle alleged violations of hazardous waste regulations at its manufacturing facility in New Castle, Pa., the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency announced today.”  Based on the information contained in the full US EPA news release, let’s determine the cost for Ellwood Quality Steels Company to comply with the regulations and avoid this fine.

 

  1. 1.       “…a variety of hazardous waste including electric and ladle arc furnace dust, which was contained in two tractor trailers without being marked as hazardous waste;” – Since no mention is made to the contrary, I’ll assume the two tractor trailers meet the US EPA definition of a container found at 40 CFR 260.10Container means any portable device in which a material is stored, transported, treated, disposed of, or otherwise handled.  A roll of 500 labels bearing the words “Hazardous Waste” = $65.  Add the date of accumulation, ie. the date hazardous waste first was placed in the container, and your back in compliance.
  2. 2.       “…improperly disposing of mercury-containing universal waste lamps in its arc furnace without a hazardous waste permit.” – Cost for disposing of 500 x 4’ fluorescent lamps with Lamptracker = $450.
  3. 3.       “… stored hazardous waste for more than 90 days without a storage permit;” – This one’s a wash since it doesn’t cost anything extra to ship hazardous waste off-site prior to 90 days.  There are some instances when a Large Quantity Generator of hazardous waste may legally exceed the 90 day on-site accumulation limit without a permit, read more about it here.  Compliance with the regulations, in this case however, is free.
  4. 4.       “failed to keep hazardous waste containers closed;”  – Hazardous waste containers must be kept closed except when adding or removing waste, read more hereNew Pig Latching Drum Lid = $275.
  5. 5.       “failed to minimize the possibility of releases of hazardous wastes;” – I’m unsure what is meant by this, but since Pennsylvania is one of the few States that requires a containment system for the storage area of a hazardous waste generator [the others are: AL, CA, CT, MA, MN, SC (if LQG), WA, & MO (if >1,000 kg)], I’ll assume they didn’t provide proper containment.  I’m no contractor, so let’s assume the total cost to construct a storage area with containment = $25,000.
  6. 6.       “failed to conduct weekly inspections;” – Large and Small Quantity Generators of hazardous waste must weekly inspect their hazardous waste accumulation and storage areas, read more here.  The inspections can be completed by any employee trained sufficiently to perform their duties in compliance with the regulations.  Cost in lost time spent performing the inspection = $50/week = $2,600/year.
  7. 7.       “failed to provide hazardous waste training;” – I provide on-site training that meets the requirements of the US EPA for Hazardous Waste Personnel and the US DOT for HazMat Employees for $1,749.
  8. 8.       “failed to prepare and maintain hazardous training records;” – I provide these records as part of my on-site training; cost = $0.
  9. 9.       “failed to properly fill out hazardous waste manifests;” – I address the proper completion of the Uniform Hazardous Waste Manifest at my on-site training and at my open-enrollment training at no additional cost.
  10. 10.   “and failed to comply with universal waste labeling/marking requirements.” – Though provided relief from full regulation under RCRA, universal waste still has specific labeling and marking requirements.  Learn how to comply with the regulations at one of my training events.  Purchase 100 universal waste labels from Labelmaster for $44.

Total cost to comply with regulations = $27,583 + $2,600/year for inspections.  Consider that the cost of the fines doesn’t begin to cover the total costs to the company in lost time, headaches, lawyer and consultant fees, etc.  No matter what math you use, it’s always less expensive to comply with the regulations than it is to pay the fines.

Please contact me for a free consultation; I can help you decide if you’d be better attending one of my open enrollment training events or having me conduct on-site training at your facility.

Tags: , , ,

Notification of Regulated Waste Activity Form for Hazardous Waste Generators

The US EPA requires you to submit a Notification of Regulated Waste Activity (8700-12) Form for certain activities involving wastes subject to the regulations of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).  A Notification is required if you handle a regulated waste or hazardous secondary material and may be required under the following circumstances:

  • You are a Large Quantity Generator (LQG) or Small Quantity Generator (SQG) of hazardous waste.  A Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator of hazardous waste (CESQG) is not required to notify.
  • You are a Large Quantity Handler of universal waste (accumulate >5,000 Kg of universal waste).
  • You recycle hazardous waste.
  • You transport, process, or re-refine used oil; burn off-spec used oil for energy recovery; or market used oil.  The generation, storage, and off-site transportation of used oil is not subject to notification.
  • You are an eligible academic entity opting into 40 CFR 262, Subpart K.
  • You are managing a hazardous secondary material.

Upon receipt of an initial notification form, your site will be issued a unique EPA ID number by the US EPA.  This number is specific to the geographic location of your site and does not change if you sell the property or expire if you go out of business.

If you already have an EPA ID number, you must submit a subsequent notification for changes in any of the following:

The Notification of Regulated Waste Activity Form is the method the US EPA or your state environmental agency (see below) relies on to track your regulated waste activities.  It is your responsibility to ensure the information they have is up-to-date, accurate, and complete. The US EPA recently updated its Notification of Regulated Waste Activity Instructions and Form Booklet in December 2011 and it contains very helpful information.

Many states with authorized hazardous waste programs have their own procedures and requirements for submittal of the initial and subsequent notification forms.  State-specific regulations may include:

  • A state-specific notification form in lieu of the federal form.
  • Time lines for submittal of the initial and subsequent notifications.
  • If using the US EPA form, a state mailing address for submittal.
  • Fees to accompany the notification.

It is very important that you check with your state to ensure your submittal meets their requirements.  

My training services cover the hazardous waste regulations of the US EPA and the HazMat Employee regulations of the US DOT.  I provide open enrollment training events nationwide and year round (my schedule) and on-site training to meet your exact needs.  Please contact me to arrange for the exact training services you require.

Tags: , , , , , ,